konceptjones
The one between three and three.
Stuff from 40 years ago in a giant automotive assembly line is a horrible example for you to use, but it lowkey proves 1 of my points. They spend money to prevent raising wages and claim they cant afford it, wages dont get raised, then as they silently spend money figuring how to cut jobs anyway. Robots were coming to certain assembly plants regardless of pay. Its literally impossible for a human to weld as fast and as accurate as a robot. Execs knew this, but where pretending like it was UAW's fault.
As for the second part, from just reading that I can tell that you dont really care or follow any of this. Just repeat the same thing you always say without reading up on anything. Seems like in your mind you're right and unless someone is agreeing with you, you dont care to listen.
Because if you were discussing this since 2013 you'd really notice that since then the Federal min wage has been the same. Its still $7.25. So how have people played themselves when they've been calling for an increased min wage, and havent gotten it?
Seems to me, the people that have played themselves are the ones that have been saying if they raise the min wage, they'd give jobs robots. They didnt raise shit and still gave jobs to robots. How do you explain that?
Bruh, if the people had said "give us a $10-$11" federal minimum, and the legislation to put that into place was introduced in the House, I'm quite sure it would have passed and we really wouldn't be having this whole robots convo. The catalyst that lit a fire under the suits to finally give in to robots in fast food and whatnot was twofold: 1. Constant demands for a $15/hr minimum wage which they were unwilling to pay and 2. Staff shortages thanks to this mass exodus from these jobs we've been seeing for the last year and a half or so linked to that same $15/hr demand.
Now you have the conditions to where corporate suits are like "aiight... what are our options?" and here's the robot vendors with a solution that will pay for itself over a couple of years. Those companies that decided, instead, to raise their starting pay to $10+/hr have people working, those that didn't are having staffing shortages.