So the stakes make it a better movie? HmmI went with Logan for the fact that it seemed like the stakes mattered in a meaningful way
It was about as "real" as you could get for the source material
In other words, if this was just a movie with no comic book elements, no mutant, no abilities, I would still think it was a solid choice of the two.
But on the flipside if Ironman wasn’t called iron man would you consider it better? (Not better than Logan but just a better movie)