Golden
Administrator
I didn't say the reaction was warranted. I said they all aint shit.We don't know the details to their parenting arrangement , but let's say he's not allowed, is that reaction warranted? The fact that you're defending this shit proves you're just as fucked up in the head as she is.
If a chick takes 5 dollars from my dresser to get a drink and I beat her ass for taking money that ain't hers, is what I did justified?
Did you not read before you got in your feelings?In most of these family dysfunction vids, all parties aint shit n this is another one of them. They're both petty people who prioritized arguing n being right over their kids. Instead of diffusing drama, he started recording it n defending his decision to cut their hair without consulting her. Only innocent parties in that clip r the kids.
n small as it is, cutting the hair of kids u dont have custody of is crossing a boundary. if he had partial custody I wouldn't say shit, n only she would be in the wrong. but this guy only has visitation. that doesn't entail decision-making unless with express consent of custodial parent. they have a custody/visitation order n it has to be respected or amended.
if u beat her ass, you are in the wrong for being 1 violent fucker. does u being a violent fucker negate that she is a thief? no.If a chick takes 5 dollars from my dresser to get a drink and I beat her ass for taking money that ain't hers, is what I did justified?
taking ur disproportionate reaction (violence) out of the equation, she would still have stolen that 5 dollars.
taking the theft out of the equation, u still beat someone up without physical provocation.
what if i told u it's possible to recognize both? it aint gotta mean u justifying shit.
Nah, I'm afraid I just hold an opinion u dislike.The fact that you're defending this shit proves you're just as fucked up in the head as she is.