Soul_Rattler
Active Member
So a sigma is an Alpha with Beta tendencies...
So a sigma is an Alpha with Beta tendencies...
Lol that's an Alpha bruhno. Sigma is similar to Alpha but simply doesn't give a fuck. Doesn't need to "belong" to anything unless it benefits him and even then leaves once is't no longer useful, doesn't give a fuck about what you think, really doesn't give a fuck about you, and generally operates outside of any rules imposed on everyone else.
Lol that's an Alpha bruh
im the same way....I've been pretty steady in who I am. Maybe the only person that would challenge that would be my moms but that's 'cause she consistently mis-read the reasons I did shit.
thats nothing to be proud of gabi......i know you can do betterI'm plotting on one right now
Lemme get my jokes off nigga damn!thats nothing to be proud of gabi......i know you can do better
I get what you're saying. But that's still Alpha shit.Nah, Alpha want to be the leader of the pack, Sigma says "fuck the pack, I'm going over here... and don't follow me either"
nope....I get what you're saying. But that's still Alpha shit.
What you're suggesting is counter scientific and against natural law.nope....
its being and needing only himself.
most alphas need betas to be who they are.
without someone around thats lower or inferior to you....you can not be the alpha.
kinda like having your own apartment...and saying you make all the decisions. you need someone to say you have the decisions over.
alphas want to be leaders
betas need a leader and sigmas dont need nor want to be either
What you're suggesting is counter scientific and against natural law.
Alpha is Alpha because it's first. It's there not because anything came after it, but because it's simply there. The nature of Alpha is self existing. What you're describing is anything that comes after alpha because Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc need something else to come before and after.
I get the need to differentiate the lunkhead blowhard Alphas from the lone soldier Alphas but personality groups have subsets. Not all Alphas rely on others to affirm their existence.
nope....
its being and needing only himself.
most alphas need betas to be who they are.
without someone around thats lower or inferior to you....you can not be the alpha.
kinda like having your own apartment...and saying you make all the decisions. you need someone to say you have the decisions over.
alphas want to be leaders
betas need a leader and sigmas dont need nor want to be either
well then it still fits meThis feels like an oversimplification, guy
I heard that Han Solo is a good example of a sigma. It's not just that he doesn't want others around him, it's that others do not have control over him. Just being a lone wolf does not make you a sigma if you are not able to function in society in a way that lets you be your own boss and avoid being affected by other people's choices and control. What Han does isn't really determined by the empire or by the Jedi, he makes his own rules. In the same way, if you're a solo rider, but you still take orders from a boss or manager, then you don't fit the description
What you're suggesting is counter scientific and against natural law.
Alpha is Alpha because it's first. It's there not because anything came after it, but because it's simply there. The nature of Alpha is self existing. What you're describing is anything that comes after alpha because Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc need something else to come before and after.
I get the need to differentiate the lunkhead blowhard Alphas from the lone soldier Alphas but personality groups have subsets. Not all Alphas rely on others to affirm their existence.
the thing i have noticed in the past is that dude try to be alphas by faking it.How else do we know who is the dominant person in a social group if we don't look at how the people interact in the social group and who has the most power and respect and bitches?