Welcome To aBlackWeb

ABW COURT: DOS vs Chi-City

i will start tonight.

do we go back and forth or do i present and he presents then the decision made?
 
i will start tonight.

do we go back and forth or do i present and he presents then the decision made?


It's all at once when it starts. U gotta have your rebuttals on the spot.


Will you be able to do it today?
 
Opening statement: That nigga sensitive af and should have checked his emotions at the door
 
Closing statement:
Fuck him
Fuck his bilingual family
Fuck his summer vacations to the Islands
Fuck anyone that thinks he should see a dime of my money
 
@Goldie
I ask that @Elzo69Renaissance be dropped from representing the defendant. due to the sophistication and financial backing of the defendant and the emotional attachment his representation now has from being turned away by myself and Pralims Global corp....and to add to this it is a conflict of interest.

I present this to have this attorney disqualified from this case

the man who defends himself has a fool for a client
i ve learned from experience clients likea straight shooter.......my retainer is a 100K ABW dollars
Ok cool
@Elzo69Renaissance ya services are needed
I'll give you 50k now and 50k after we win
I'd also like you to file a countersuit for defamation and malicious prosecution
@Freshb651 10k a day to keep @DOS_patos and his legal team from going thru my personal belongings and shit
I got u just need all the details in order to prep the best defense


The American bar association in 1908 drafted a code of ethics that clearly state the attorney client privilege can only move forward with the previous clients consent. otherwise its a conflict of interest.

I do not consent
 
@ChiCity 's opening and closing statements show that he has no respect for the plaintiff and more importantly this court room. The court finds @ChiCity guilty on all charges!

giphy.gif
 
@Goldie
I ask that @Elzo69Renaissance be dropped from representing the defendant. due to the sophistication and financial backing of the defendant and the emotional attachment his representation now has from being turned away by myself and Pralims Global corp....and to add to this it is a conflict of interest.

I present this to have this attorney disqualified from this case







The American bar association in 1908 drafted a code of ethics that clearly state the attorney client privilege can only move forward with the previous clients consent. otherwise its a conflict of interest.

I do not consent
@Goldie as an attorney for the Firm of Levy, Littlefinger and Ferguson, i do have the right of to advertise, solicit and offer my services to highest bidder. @Dos Patos accusations not only but hinge on being defamatory but are insulting to my professionalism....if he doesnt retract his accusations, i might be inclined to take legal action
 
@Goldie as an attorney for the Firm of Levy, Littlefinger and Ferguson, i do have the right of to advertise, solicit and offer my services to highest bidder. @Dos Patos accusations not only but hinge on being defamatory but are insulting to my professionalism....if he doesnt retract his accusations, i might be inclined to take legal action
you honor......

it seems the defendant has his "homie" in a tizzy and now is coming for my neck. this is why we are in court today.

if i may your honor present the Illinos code of ethic and model code 1.7:200 that states that this rule is put in place as a safeguard feature to stop a lawyer who was trusted with loyalty to now sue his previous client.

please look it up your honor.

and the fact this man practices law in chicago places him right in this and therefore he should be disqualified.

I would also like to state this THIS man has been sworn to protect the laws of our dear country ...but your honor....



THIS MAN HAS BEEN TO CUBA

SO NOT ONLY DOES HE NOT ABIDE BY THE CODE OF ETHICS PUT IN PLACE BY THE AMERICAN BOARD OF ATTORNEYS SINCE 1908...HE VISITS COMMUNISM COUNTRIES WHO IS SPECULATED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF A US PRESIDENT AND HAS BEEN AN ENEMY OF THE STATE FOR 50+ YEARS.


hES GUILT AS WELL.

hE IS AN ENEMY OF THE COURT AND BROKE THE LAW HIMSELF.

 
Back
Top