? yes..So you want me to stop picking on you?
Is this your formal request?
? yes..So you want me to stop picking on you?
Is this your formal request?
I think this goes more to what @BDBIID was saying. Niggas focusing too much of the stats to judge a player. If you never watch him live then you do not know. Reggie Miller was more than his stats. Like i said. Before the shooters of today there was Reggie Miller. He made an irrelevant Pacers franchise relevant for a bit, had great playoff performances and that's where you really create your legacy in the playoffs and because of his flare and shit talking made him a very entertaining player to watch. He more than his stats.
i just answer that question.....but i will kill it off of one point. Name me a Del Curry playoff game? I will wait.
Is it because Reggie is annoying on TNT? There has to be more to it than this. And it’s 99% coming from people who didn’t see him play. It’s weird.
What team was dell curry leading, great shooter but niggas wasn't game planning for steph's dad. Real easy to get those shots when Mourning and Larry Johnson on the teamwhat's the difference b/t Miller and say Dell Curry?
semi serious question
the latter
Idk I’m speaking in general.if there are 10 people who post in here, name 9 that didnt see Miller play in real time
i was talking about statistically but thank you for at least trying to answer the questionWhat team was dell curry leading, great shooter but niggas wasn't game planning for steph's dad. Real easy to get those shots when Mourning and Larry Johnson on the team
I remember those awesome playoff runs he used to lead the Bucks to in the 2000’s. The Pistons and young LeBron used to have their hands full with Michael Redd’s Bucks teams...Micheal redd with longevity
So hes the 90s version of Jimmy Butler, but without the historic playoff performances.
No ones gonna call Butler elite in 15 years. Were all gonna say he was a very good, very impactful player. No one is shitting on reggie, yall just wanna overrate him for nostalgia sake
One of your funniest posts.
Stats can be misleading, I'll take the player who's the #1 option over the #3 on the team.i was talking about statistically but thank you for at least trying to answer the question
ftr, i didnt look up either of their stats, but this was one of those "who would you take, player A, player B " type of questions w/o knowing who was who
Micheal redd with longevity