wadupdoe!313
OG
This just a waste of taxpayers money
Put Mahomes behind our o line he ain’t throwing 50 TDS
Chiefs gave up 26 sacks
Texans gave up 62 sacks
Alex Smith didnt do it.......Cause he was waiting on our bum ass receiving core to get open. Easy to rack up TDS when you’re throwing to Kareem hunt, tyreke hill, and Travis kelce.
Just heard Andrew Whitworth say the Giants told his agent they weren't interested in his services 3 years ago during FA bc they believed in their "young players" ie ereck flowers n Bobby hart. Fuuuuuck you jerry Reese.
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Six days before the Super Bowl, the court battle has begun in a longshot lawsuit seeking a possible do-over of the NFC game that ended with a Los Angeles Rams victory over the New Orleans Saints, a game affected by what the NFL concedes was a blown ''no-call'' by officials.
A Monday hearing in federal court did not result in an immediate ruling. It dealt largely with a jurisdictional question.
The two Saints season ticket holders who filed the lawsuit want it heard in state court in New Orleans. The NFL filed to have it heard in federal court, where U.S. District Judge Susie Morgan heard initial arguments at midday. She was expected to meet with attorneys on both sides again in the evening and it was unclear when the jurisdictional issue, or the case itself, would be resolved.
Officials failed to call interference or roughness penalties when a Rams player leveled a Saints receiver with a helmet-to-helmet hit at a crucial point in the in the final minutes of regulation time. The Rams won the Jan. 20 game in overtime and are set to play the New England Patriots in Sunday's Super Bowl.
The lawsuit by two Saints season ticket holders, Tommy Badeaux and Candis Lambert, says NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell should implement a league rule - Rule 17 - governing ''extraordinarily unfair acts.'' Remedies include reversal of a game's result or the rescheduling of a game - in its entirety or from the point when the act occurred.
NFL lawyers say the lawsuit belongs in federal court for reasons including the possible scope. They argued that the suit takes the form of a class action that could mean millions of dollars in damages for Saints ticket holders and others in what the suit calls ''the Who Dat Nation,'' a reference to Saints fans and a popular team cheer.
Attorney Frank D'Amico, who filed the lawsuit two days after the championship game, said that, while the lawsuit recounts damages suffered by Saints fans, it doesn't specifically ask for monetary compensation. Instead, D'Amico said, it seeks a court order, under state law, forcing Goodell to investigate the blown call under the never before invoked Rule 17.
D'Amico also insisted that he wasn't specifically asking for a court-ordered do-over or reversal of the game, although that could be the result if the rule is invoked. ''We're not trying to keep the Super Bowl from going forward,'' he said.
That appeared to surprise Gladstone Jones, a New Orleans attorney arguing for the NFL, who said it would be ''big news'' that D'Amico's clients aren't trying to stop or delay the big game.
As to D'Amico's call for an investigation, Jones said there is no need. League officials, he said, have clearly reviewed the calls. ''They have done their due diligence.''
His arguments tracked positions taken in weekend briefs filed by NFL lawyers.
''The NFL parties do not dispute that they have previously advised the Saints, including the club's head coach, that one or more penalties - for pass interference or illegal helmet-to-helmet contact - were mistakenly not called late in the NFC Championship Game, and that the NFL would like its officials on the field to make these calls,'' an NFL filing says.
But it also says Goodell, a defendant in the lawsuit along with the league itself, does not have the authority to overrule a referee on the field. Even if the rule did apply, the NFL attorneys argue, a decision on a remedy is up to the commissioner, not a ticket-holder.
Morgan had to step away from a jury trial in an unrelated case to preside over Monday's hearing. Records show she got the case after it was initially assigned to U.S. District Judge Barry Ashe - who removed himself from the case because he has Saints season tickets.
most of those tweets have come from ~gasps~ non saints fansSaints fans gotta get over this now. Reading about the missed call everytime I enter this thread is annoying.
https://www.pewterreport.com/rapoport-expects-bucs-to-consider-signing-rb-hunt/
Kareem Hunt to the Bucs. Bucs need to make that move
Wonder how long that suspension will be. They need to take into account the games he already missed for being cut.
Wonder how long that suspension will be. They need to take into account the games he already missed for being cut.
I think they will 1st suspend him for 10. he will appeal it, then they will agree on 8.
real talk, since twitter started putting the picks out there ahead of the announcement, i havent watched the draft in probably 4 yearsHow yall think players be when rookies at the draft dap up and hug goddell?
I know I be pissed when corporate give kudos to people I know ain't shit
I'm a football nut..I'm beta and infamous when it comes to football. I watch the fucking scouting combine fam..from o linemen to secondary, I'm tuned in.real talk, since twitter started putting the picks out there ahead of the announcement, i havent watched the draft in probably 4 years
i know they cracked down on it recently and they at least wait until the announcement, but i get the draft info from twitter w/o the bullshit analysis and commercials