IP360
Doctorate & Ph.D in Bootyology
lmao there's like 4 different fights going on in this thread at the same time
Pretty much me...
lmao there's like 4 different fights going on in this thread at the same time
2 is enough. Ignore that Dizz thing.I only saw 2 bare dicks
??
Crazy as fuck
I cant be the only one that see the desperation in your postsThis cac dis the site owner then cop a plea right after. Pathetic.
:ohword4:I mean...i didn't look...I heard
I understand that but usually vouchers suffice. Shes not gettin the same energy from everyone tho.Idgaf about nudes fam, I only care about the truth, something you nor I know about as it pertains to this situation.
I told her. I wasn’t supposed to. I didn’t describe them tho. She’s innocent.:ohword4:
Poor attempt of changing the narrative cac.I cant be the only one that see the desperation in your posts
I cant
I understand that but usually vouchers suffice. Shes not gettin the same energy from everyone tho.
I'm not everybody else, mfs not doing their due diligence is how we got into this situation.I understand that but usually vouchers suffice. Shes not gettin the same energy from everyone tho.
Run that lawsuit then my GI'm not everybody else, mfs not doing their due diligence is how we got into this situation.
Goldie you the homie but this is harassment lol
Sounds like the problem here is whoever let into the part of the site where pic was required without attaining proof firstDemanding a proof pic to remain on MY site is harassment? After she/he was in a section of the site that required a proof pic being given?
How is that harassment?
Demanding a proof pic to remain on MY site is harassment? After she/he was in a section of the site that required a proof pic being given?
How is that harassment?
I could argue but I really don't care about this shit lolDemanding a proof pic to remain on MY site is harassment? After she/he was in a section of the site that required a proof pic being given?
How is that harassment?
Suck a dick bitchPoor attempt of changing the narrative cac.
Sounds like the problem here is whoever let into the part of the site where pic was required without attaining proof first
If she didnt ask to be in there its not really on her.