YepYeah the first movie was trash and I never got the hype
Essentially, Todd Phillips had Warner Brothers at gunpoint and he got everything he wanted and they bent the knee cause the first movie did a billie. Wouldn't be surprised if Warner Brothers doesn't do this again with any director
View attachment 1393397
This is so dope to me man. Fearless shit.Essentially, Todd Phillips had Warner Brothers at gunpoint and he got everything he wanted and they bent the knee cause the first movie did a billie. Wouldn't be surprised if Warner Brothers doesn't do this again with any director
View attachment 1393397
Here is what I was told happened by a friend who did his research. Let me say at the top that I didn't watch either movie.
But according to my boy, the director of the movie wasn't happy how his Joker was turned into some sort of icon by the right wing white supremacists. It seems like in the first movie, they depicted Joker as this loser who kept blaming life and the system for his short comings. The audience was supposed to understand his perspective but not really relate. Especially when he goes full murderer and starts killing folk.
But ofcourse, this spoke to young white supremacists who think the system is to blame for their shitty ass existences. The director was like wtf, Joker shouldn't have talking to y'all and got y'all to relate like that.
So he approached the second movie by completely destroying the character he built in the first movie. Apart from being a musical, he had this mfer be a whiny ass loser who got raped in jail, begged to be released, couldnt last more than a few pumps when fucking, and eventually got mercy killed.
The directors purpose was to completely strip away anything that made Arthur a hero to the white angst crowd in the first movie and portray him as an absolute loser.
Now again, I bailed out on watching the first movie soon as I heard white supremacists loved it cause they related to Arthur. And no way was I ever gonna watch the second movie after skipping the first.
But if the above is true, then props to the director cause he did capture the shit perfectly. These white angst mfers really are some losers that constantly fail at life and blame the "system" or others when the system is set up specifically for them to succeed.
To all y'all who thoroughly disappointed and feel like y'all lost money on this bullshit, good.
Like I said bro, that director was a gangsta for that and I didn't know about this shit. I can remember a film this fearless especially when the last one made 1 billion lol.Here is what I was told happened by a friend who did his research. Let me say at the top that I didn't watch either movie.
But according to my boy, the director of the movie wasn't happy how his Joker was turned into some sort of icon by the right wing white supremacists. It seems like in the first movie, they depicted Joker as this loser who kept blaming life and the system for his short comings. The audience was supposed to understand his perspective but not really relate. Especially when he goes full murderer and starts killing folk.
But ofcourse, this spoke to young white supremacists who think the system is to blame for their shitty ass existences. The director was like wtf, Joker shouldn't have talking to y'all and got y'all to relate like that.
So he approached the second movie by completely destroying the character he built in the first movie. Apart from being a musical, he had this mfer be a whiny ass loser who got raped in jail, begged to be released, couldnt last more than a few pumps when fucking, and eventually got mercy killed.
The directors purpose was to completely strip away anything that made Arthur a hero to the white angst crowd in the first movie and portray him as an absolute loser.
Now again, I bailed out on watching the first movie soon as I heard white supremacists loved it cause they related to Arthur. And no way was I ever gonna watch the second movie after skipping the first.
But if the above is true, then props to the director cause he did capture the shit perfectly. These white angst mfers really are some losers that constantly fail at life and blame the "system" or others when the system is set up specifically for them to succeed.
To all y'all who thoroughly disappointed and feel like y'all lost money on this bullshit, good.
It was a dope film in general.. this is ABW you gotta expect the random bs takes.I don't know how anyone can think
Joker isn't a great film and partial origin story for Joker and Gotham. I could probably watch the film weekly and never get bored.
I will just pretend it's a stand alone film with no follow up.
This shit is all spin though we see with flops. The idea Phillips made a garbage movie to pissed off nazis makes no sense, the first Joker made over $1 billion, $700 mil outside of the US. So to focus on a small group of online weirdos as opposed to the majority who went to see it would be ruining his career over nothing. Those same weirdos love that this movie is flopping anyway, and you know Gaga was thinking this was Oscar baitHere is what I was told happened by a friend who did his research. Let me say at the top that I didn't watch either movie.
But according to my boy, the director of the movie wasn't happy how his Joker was turned into some sort of icon by the right wing white supremacists. It seems like in the first movie, they depicted Joker as this loser who kept blaming life and the system for his short comings. The audience was supposed to understand his perspective but not really relate. Especially when he goes full murderer and starts killing folk.
But ofcourse, this spoke to young white supremacists who think the system is to blame for their shitty ass existences. The director was like wtf, Joker shouldn't have talking to y'all and got y'all to relate like that.
So he approached the second movie by completely destroying the character he built in the first movie. Apart from being a musical, he had this mfer be a whiny ass loser who got raped in jail, begged to be released, couldnt last more than a few pumps when fucking, and eventually got mercy killed.
The directors purpose was to completely strip away anything that made Arthur a hero to the white angst crowd in the first movie and portray him as an absolute loser.
Now again, I bailed out on watching the first movie soon as I heard white supremacists loved it cause they related to Arthur. And no way was I ever gonna watch the second movie after skipping the first.
But if the above is true, then props to the director cause he did capture the shit perfectly. These white angst mfers really are some losers that constantly fail at life and blame the "system" or others when the system is set up specifically for them to succeed.
To all y'all who thoroughly disappointed and feel like y'all lost money on this bullshit, good.