There are a plenty of women in this age range with no kidsThis sounds a little depressing for dudes in their 30s with no kids trying to find a wife in this dating game lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are a plenty of women in this age range with no kidsThis sounds a little depressing for dudes in their 30s with no kids trying to find a wife in this dating game lol
Mr B. Fam, as an educator, I'll assume you see a lot of kids from homes that don't have positive male influences.I could ask do you hate MEN or not, cause it seems like you make a better case for being a male misandrist than me being a child/women hater.
Go back to my original quote. My profession has ZERO to do with my opinion about this subject, yet you couldn't help but to try to use that against me. That sounds personal to me.
If a lot of women don’t feel comfortable around most men they don’t know and you have said numerous times women need to do what they can to protect themselves not wanting to be around a strange man seems to make sense.
Incel and redpill are the same vein to me. Like FBA and ados. Or KKK and skinheads. Yea may sound different but saying the same shit
Hinge
Bumble
![]()
At least you didn't say tinder or POF lolHinge
Bumble
![]()
lol So, in your mind being around a bear is a reasonable alternative for protection?
Once again, incels =/= redpill. Red pill is basically a philosophy that says aspects of society are currently constructed in a way that benefits women but hurts men. Incels are dudes that are mad because they can't get pussy. A lot of incels flock to red pill content because it offers them an excuse for why they fail with women. That doesn't mean you can just attach every crazy thing incels do to red pill content. It also doesn't mean you can reduce red pill content down to woman hating. For example, a topic most red pill creators touch on is the high male suicide rate in the country. Sure, the misogynists try to blame that on women, but the more reasonable red pillers take the stance that our systems just overlook the needs of males and make light of the problems males face.
I'll say it again, some dudes on the net that bitch because they think the world was a better place when women were second class citizens are not the same as chicks that demonize, dehumanize, and wish death on men.
At least you didn't say tinder or POF lol
POF thread on the old spot was epic.
Mr B. Fam, as an educator, I'll assume you see a lot of kids from homes that don't have positive male influences.
I'll also assume that you believe or may have even experienced a young man or young lady who took to a certain teacher as a positive influence.
While they aren't a step parent to that child, they are operating as a positive influence in that kids life. Being a step parent to a kid that's not yours isn't a death sentence. And yes, you are entitled to your preferences to date women that don't have kids. Nothing wrong with that at all. But for you to say the shit that you said, being an educator who could possibly have positive influence on a young person I felt was distasteful af
Because it’s for suckas.
Putting your time, energy, and money into a kid that’s not yours, that can use that “you ain’t my dad” line when shit gets too real, and that the mom can get up and roll at anytime, take the kid, and leave, KNOWING you’ve put in effort to bond with the kid…..yeah…
That’s sucker shit.
That's for horny dudes and sticky shit under the barrel women.At least you didn't say tinder or POF lol
I don't have a dog in this fight. But as a nigga on the outside looking in, this is a great summation of the issue.
You said the following @Mister Breeze...
As an educator...I'm CERTAIN that you've put your time, energy, and money into a kid that wasn't yours. So to hear you say that it's for suckers seems a bit strange and counterintuitive to people. And if you've never done that and feel that doing so if for suckers, then the fact that you're in a career that often REQUIRES you to put time, energy and money into kids that aren't yours, is off-putting to people.
And it seems weird and disingenuous to pretend that anytime someone points it out, that they just don't like you or have an issue with you.
Use your words
1) Two different scenarios. Being an educator is a shit-ton different from being a PARENT. Being an educator is a 8-3, 8-4 job, but they go AWAY from you after that, and it’s only for a few years while they’re in the same school you work at.I don't have a dog in this fight. But as a nigga on the outside looking in, this is a great summation of the issue.
You said the following @Mister Breeze...
As an educator...I'm CERTAIN that you've put your time, energy, and money into a kid that wasn't yours. So to hear you say that it's for suckers seems a bit strange and counterintuitive to people. And if you've never done that and feel that doing so if for suckers, then the fact that you're in a career that often REQUIRES you to put time, energy and money into kids that aren't yours, is off-putting to people.
And it seems weird and disingenuous to pretend that anytime someone points it out, that they just don't like you or have an issue with you.
You can be so obtuse.. Got damn.. Talk about missing the mark completely1) Two different scenarios. Being an educator is a shit-ton different from being a PARENT. Being an educator is a 8-3, 8-4 job, but they go AWAY from you after that, and it’s only for a few years while they’re in the same school you work at.
Parenting is 24/7/365/insert xxx years here, and you don’t get paid for it. In fact, quite the opposite….where you SPEND MONEY to be a parent. To feed, clothe, house a kid that’s not even your own DNA. Nah. It’s no good, no bueno, and your equivalence was super false.
2) Like I’ve said dozens of times, if your first reaction to anything I say that you don’t agree with is to attack my career, and not whatever point I made, THAT’s when it sounds personal. You don’t like my comment, fine. Attack the MESSAGE, not the MESSENGER.
Oh, I got it. I just don’t agree. That’s not obtuse. That’s just not seeing YOUR POV.You can be so obtuse.. Got damn.. Talk about missing the mark completely