Black_Samson
OG
What?!It should.
A rapist shouldn't be in the same category as a child predator.......unless they're actually a child predator.
Both are violent!
A very wack devils advocate.
What?!It should.
A rapist shouldn't be in the same category as a child predator.......unless they're actually a child predator.
You a gotdamn lieIt should.
A rapist shouldn't be in the same category as a child predator.......unless they're actually a child predator.
a child predator is a rapist, but a rapist isn't necessarily a child predator. Children can't give consent.It should.
A rapist shouldn't be in the same category as a child predator.......unless they're actually a child predator.
and they are still a rapist tho
You a gotdamn lie
a child predator is a rapist, but a rapist isn't necessarily a child predator. Children can't give consent.
What?!
Both are violent!
A very wack devils advocate.
I just read up on this case recently, and some of the details are giving me cause for concern.
All this time, Nicki's husband has been portrayed as a child molester.
However, him and the girl in question were both 16 at the time the incident occurred.
According to people in their neighborhood, they were both in a relationship at the time and they don't think he raped her.
Made it seem like they were together.........he smashed.............then dipped, and she's just getting back at him by accusing him of rape.
Now, if this is true, then I can somewhat understand why it's so hard for him to let this go.
However, if it's not true............and he did indeed rape that girl........then I stand by my original stance that he's an idiot who should've left well enough alone.