So here's where I'm coming from.
If you are a student of history, you'd know that all of our greats have been denied publicly. Louis Farrakhan, Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammad, Marcus Garvey, Harriet Tubman, even the bible says Jesus was denied 3 times. They didn't get denied because their people didn't agree with them or support them. They were denied because their people were facing the monstrous consequences of being associated with them.
When you see how commonly righteousness is denied publicly, you begin to understand that that denial does not lessen who the individual is. It's what they do after being forced to deny the truth that matters.
Obama denied Farrakhan and Jeremiah Wright and is regarded as one of the greatest presidents in US history because of it. Jesse Jackson did the same and is regarded as one of the greatest civil rights icons in black history. Peter denied Jesus and is still counted as a righteous disciple.
So when Nick Cannon has to deny the truth in that video, it's because of the greatness he's poised to achieve. His history is still being written and I cannot in good conscience rush to condemnation when I don't know what he'll do after this is all done. Maybe he will be a shill for Jewish interests until the day he dies. Or maybe he'll muster the courage and inspiration to tell those devils threatening him to go to hell and be a modern day proprietor of our freedom. But if that is a realistic possibility, it's less likely to happen if we keep going in on him "coon, sellout, corny, fake woke, weak, etc". Yall weren't thinking about his journey before so don't rush to judgement now.