Welcome To aBlackWeb

2020 NFL Offseason Thread

It's time to ease up on the idea that backing up/playing for someone means you'll do well somewhere else. Peyton, Brady, Brees, Rodgers are all recent players going to the HOF...where are all the success stories of the people that backed them up?
 
Brees last season.
If the coaches like what they see in practice and film study he will be sit up for success.

Top 3 Oline
Best WR
Productive RB
Hill being the Joker playing HB and TE
Top 3 head coach/offensive mind
Top 5 GM

IF he signs he will be doing for the future because Hill ain’t our future QB




I hope we sign him


I hope that's how it plays out. You'll see, Haha.
 
Bob McGinn suggests Matt LaFleur “simply had enough of [Aaron] Rodgers’ act”
Posted by Mike Florio on April 28, 2020, 3:05 PM EDT


Bob McGinn covered the Packers for 38 years. Which makes his opinions regarding the team worth considering.
So consider this paragraph from McGinn’s review of Green Bay’s much-maligned 2020 draft for TheAthletic.com, which started with the Packers trading up from No. 30 to No. 26 to draft Utah State quarterback Jordan Love: “Public niceties aside, my sense is [coach Matt] LaFleur, fresh from a terrific 13-3 baptismal season, simply had enough of [Aaron] Rodgers’ act and wanted to change the narrative. With a first-round talent on the roster, the Packers would gain leverage with their imperial quarterback and his passive-aggressive style. If the Packers do indeed want to become a running team next season, they surely wouldn’t want Rodgers rocking the boat and becoming even more difficult to coach.”
There’s a lot to unpack in that passage. It implies that Rodgers acted in a way that LaFleur found distasteful in 2019. If so, the team did a good job of covering it up. By all appearances, LaFleur decided to embrace his franchise quarterback and to let him run the offense the way he sees fit, after the offseason awkwardness regarding the so-called “audible issue.” Indeed, after the team lost to the 49ers in the NFC Championship, Rodgers was surprisingly upbeat.
Also, McGinn suggests that Rodgers has continued to be passive-aggressive under LaFleur. That routine seemed to end after the Packers fired coach Mike McCarthy. however. All in all, Rodgers was pleased with the changes that the team made under LaFleur and G.M. Brian Gutekunst.
Likewise, McGinn believes that Rodgers was “difficult to coach” last year and that he will be “even more difficult to coach” if the team shifts its offense to a run-based attack in 2020.
If any of McGinn’s assessment is accurate, things could get ugly in Green Bay. The best outcome would entail Rodgers helping Love get up to speed quickly, so that it would be easier for the Packers to justify giving Rodgers what he already may want: A ticket to another team.
The biggest impediment continues to be the salary-cap implications of trading Rodgers. A deal before June 1, 2021 would wreak havoc on the team’s salary cap. Even then, it makes the most sense to keep Rodgers for two more years.
Regardless of whether McGinn’s musings have hit the mark, the circumstances suggest that things will be awkward at a minimum in 2020, and possibly beyond, for the Packers and Rodgers. Whether the Packers wanted that, at a minimum they’re OK with it. Even if Rodgers isn’t.
 
It's time to ease up on the idea that backing up/playing for someone means you'll do well somewhere else. Peyton, Brady, Brees, Rodgers are all recent players going to the HOF...where are all the success stories of the people that backed them up?
Aaron Rogers (Super Bowl champion) - was Bret Favre back up

Brady (Super Bowl champion) was Drew Bledsoe back up

Jimmy Garoppolo played in the Super Bowl last season, after being Brady’s back up...
 
Last edited:
I dont get tendering Tysom Hill, Resigning Brees, and signing Winston.
I do.

Here’s the plan:

Brees starts, and SB or bust, he retires at season’s end.

Jameis learns under Brees, and does the Teddy B role as needed. Jameis parlays for a long-term deal from someone next year, unless he fucks this up, then he’s permanently demoted to backup status whatever he goes, but he’s gone from NOLA after this season, too.

Tayson Hill is the future. He continues his gadget role, where really learning the QB playbook to take over in 2021. He then becomes the heir apparent in NOLA.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top