Poll Would U Consider ABW To Be A Porn Site?

How Many Members Would Bounce If There Was No Porn Here?

  • Up To 10%

    Votes: 9 10.6%
  • Maybe 25%

    Votes: 15 17.6%
  • 50% Or More

    Votes: 55 64.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 6 7.1%

  • Total voters
    85
At this point the thread title should be updated

ABW is a porn site
 
Just outta curiosity, what is the most popular forum on this site?

Meaning, what gets the most views and most traffic?

@AP2.0
 
Just outta curiosity, what is the most popular forum on this site?

Meaning, what gets the most views and most traffic?

@AP2.0
To be honest, I can't see that but all I have to do is go to new posts and 9/10 threads most days are from the candy shop so...

Take from that what you will
 
To be honest, I can't see that but all I have to do is go to new posts and 9/10 threads most days are from the candy shop so...

Take from that what you will
1635651610873.png











tenor.gif
 
This ain't bgol and I don't want it to be. That forum is filled with lame geriatric pervert niggas and morons. Btw FUCK LIGHTBRIGHT(bgol member)
 
View attachment 632751

Further irrefutable proof this forum is a porn forum. I can't even scroll through a non-porn section of the site without seeing spiderwomans 3D phatty taking up half my screen.
It's called spyware. You watch so much spanktervision that the algerhytyms are spamming porn ads. I don't have that problem
 
I've never seen porn or nude pics outside the candy shop until the goofy started with the dumb stuff yesterday. I can't say it's a porn site
 
I've never seen porn or nude pics outside the candy shop until the goofy started with the dumb stuff yesterday. I can't say it's a porn site
Members have been pretty good about keeping the porn in the candy shop. There's also a ton that just don't venture out
 
I think the new question.. well for me anyway is... are we able to spin off the regular "normal" posting sections so we can still access the site on different public networks without it being labeled as a smut site or nah?
Probably not