And a 3rd party vote would've meant I "own" Trump's presidency as well?You own it because you did nothing to prevent it.
More importantly, you knew that sitting out could cause it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And a 3rd party vote would've meant I "own" Trump's presidency as well?You own it because you did nothing to prevent it.
More importantly, you knew that sitting out could cause it.
Nobody votes for the bullshit. They vote for the least bullshit. Cause we’re pragmatic realists that acknowledge America is built on bullshit and the best anyone can do is limit the bullshit.The nerve of mfs who willingly owns the bullshit they voted for being the moral superiority police
U don't vote for the least bullshit otherwise your vote wouldn't have been for a dem or republican. U justify compromising your ideals and feel morally superior to those who don'tNobody votes for the bullshit. They vote for the least bullshit. Cause we’re pragmatic realists that acknowledge America is built on bullshit and the best anyone can do is limit the bullshit.
No, the least bullshit only matters for candidates with a chance to win. Sit on that 3rd party or non-voting high horse as long as you want, but the horse running the country is between 1 of 2 candidates in reality. Not in this idealistic dream world where a 3rd party has a chance.U don't vote for the least bullshit otherwise your vote wouldn't have been for a dem or republican. U justify compromising your ideals and feel morally superior to those who don't
And on that note, I repost this from the dem thread.White people not acknowledging they have the privilege to do whatever the fuck they want with no repercussions while still being able to play the middle and still attempt to chastise us for having to make hard choices will never not be annoying as fuck to me.
Uh huh, and why don't 3rd party have a chance?No, the least bullshit only matters for candidates with a chance to win. Sit on that 3rd party or non-voting high horse as long as you want, but the horse running the country is between 1 of 2 candidates in reality. Not in this idealistic dream world where a 3rd party has a chance.
You claim morals in an immoral country. Make that make sense.
Oh gosh another rerun of I didn't start this convo but get blamed once I partake. U act like white ppl.White people not acknowledging they have the privilege to do whatever the fuck they want with no repercussions while still being able to play the middle and still attempt to chastise us for having to make hard choices will never not be annoying as fuck to me.
Check my last post. Politics have nothing to do with personal morals. Shit is a business transaction, point blank period. We can’t afford to vote on personal morals because the most immoral will sit on that throne, which is exactly what we’re seeing now.Uh huh, and why don't 3rd party have a chance?
U can't have morals bc the country is immoral? You're not making sense.
Okay, so keep voting then.Check my last post. Politics have nothing to do with personal morals. Shit is a business transaction, point blank period. We can’t afford to vote on personal morals because the most immoral will sit on that throne, which is exactly what we’re seeing now.
And keep not voting or voting for someone that has no chance of winning and keep halting or reversing progress.Okay, so keep voting then.
I will thanksAnd keep not voting or voting for someone that has no chance of winning and keep halting or reversing progress.
Good job!
Keep letting perfection be the enemy of progress. You think MLK thought Kennedy or Johnson were moral?
Hell no!
But was he pragmatic to see that to win he had to hitch his horse to whoever would further the cause?
Of course!
Well yeah I'm against the genocide in Palestine. You mightve missed those posts in the genocide thread bc the guy/gal u voted for was funding and arming it.Aye... just checking the thread title... @ChicagoFigure ... you got any criticisms about Israel? As outspoken as you are I don't recall you saying anything sideways about that country ever.
Just saying.
Go back and see what I added about MLK. Should’ve have not worked with Kennedy and Johnson? Should he have worked with a 3rd party candidate cause they were more moral? Or did he see this shit for what it was, a business transaction.I will thanks
Idk why you're bringing up MLK when you said voting is a non moral choice. When MLK said the "burning house" quote he was literally speaking of the moral decay of the country u just told me a couple posts ago to ignore.Go back and see what I added about MLK. Should’ve have not worked with Kennedy and Johnson? Should he have worked with a 3rd party candidate cause they were more moral?
Well yeah I'm against the genocide in Palestine. You mightve missed those posts in the genocide thread bc the guy/gal u voted for was funding and arming it.
Idk why you're bringing up MLK when you said voting is a non moral choice. When MLK said the "burning house" quote he was literally speaking of the moral decay of the country u just told me a couple posts ago to ignore.