COMMUNITY United States Politics Thread: Trump's Second Term

ChicagoFigure said:
U can run down the list and I'd prob agree it's wrong. I don't ignore anything.

U do have standards and your standard is simply "one is better than the other" as if comparing shit to diarrhea is saying something.

Not voting is not a moral high ground for me. The candidates suck. I wish there was a candidate I could be motivated to vote for. Hate to be cliche but they are two sides of the same coin. Yin and yang. Yawn.
Click to expand...
But right now they are not two sides of the same coin and to suggest so is bullshit and you only say that to seem cool. Like you are more enlightened or some shit but you not.

And you actually wishing for a candidate you can be motivated to vote for shows your naïveté. There is no candidate in the history of our country we should be motivated to vote for. Every one of them were disingenuous and corrupt in one way or another. But you still believe this unicorn is out there.

Best we can do is vote for whoever is going to cause less harm, period. Cause all these mfers got issues.
 
TheNightKing said:
I don’t expect them to be honorable and trustworthy, that’s what I meant.

Deflections aside, is Trump not worse than Biden and Kamala? Would the country have been better off under Kamala?

It’s a pretty simple question. We don’t have to do all this historical re-posting.
Click to expand...
Hey Chicago since you’re back. Whats your answer?
 
TheNightKing said:
But right now they are not two sides of the same coin and to suggest so is bullshit and you only say that to seem cool. Like you are more enlightened or some shit but you not.
Click to expand...
They are always two sides of the same coin. When y'all keep pushing that i think I have a moral high ground, or that I think I'm smarter or more enlightened it comes off to me as some insecurity that u know u choosing bullshit.
TheNightKing said:
And you actually wishing for a candidate you can be motivated to vote for shows your naïveté. There is no candidate in the history of our country we should be motivated to vote for. Every one of them were disingenuous and corrupt in one way or another. But you still believe this unicorn is out there.
Click to expand...
U believe this bc u also believe it's better to let a shitty candidate run and lose than to let a better candidate run bc someone decided the shittier candidate has a better chance. Better politicians exist, we both agree on that already. U justify giving the opportunity to trash only.
TheNightKing said:
Best we can do is vote for whoever is going to cause less harm, period. Cause all these mfers got issues.
Click to expand...
U keep doing that
 
ChicagoFigure said:
They are always two sides of the same coin. When y'all keep pushing that i think I have a moral high ground, or that I think I'm smarter or more enlightened it comes off to me as some insecurity that u know u choosing bullshit.

U believe this bc u also believe it's better to let a shitty candidate run and lose than to let a better candidate run bc someone decided the shittier candidate has a better chance. Better politicians exist, we both agree on that already. U justify giving the opportunity to trash only.

U keep doing that
Click to expand...
Unless you’re DNC or RNC chair or a major donor or some shit you not choosing anything. You’re not giving an opportunity to anyone, trash or otherwise. Stop thinking you have a say.

And the people who are truly choosing these candidates only care about one thing and that’s winning. What’s the point in having the most virtuous person in the world if they lose? Moral victories mean nothing when this country is largely amoral.

You expect too much from a system that’s never been virtuous.
 
TheNightKing said:
Unless you’re DNC or RNC chair or a major donor or some shit you not choosing anything. You’re not giving an opportunity to anyone, trash or otherwise. Stop thinking you have a say.

And the people who are truly choosing these candidates only care about one thing and that’s winning. What’s the point in having the most virtuous person in the world if they lose? Moral victories mean nothing when this country is largely amoral.

You expect too much from a system that’s never been virtuous.
Click to expand...
Democracy, eh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top