SeaSnake
OG
Has carrying pregnancy never not been a woman’s choice. Yes I get slavery and patriarchy but generally the carrying of the child is on her.lol If the bold were true, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Has carrying pregnancy never not been a woman’s choice. Yes I get slavery and patriarchy but generally the carrying of the child is on her.lol If the bold were true, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Bruh, you asked me did I think it was both people's responsibility to use BC like it's not supposed to be. You didn't summarizeI'm confused the first part of the question was just a summary of your stance in response to Freeman.
It's just not that simple because you say so lol. Sorry bud.
well the law says the same thing champ. That’s why you can’t force women to get abortions because you don’t want the kid. Nor can you force her to have it
But the fetus inside belongs to the father. If a man wants to have the baby then the mother shouldn't be the sole voice on whether to terminate since it doesn't work the other way if the father doesn't want the babysimple once you nut in a chick your choice on what she does with is now hers. She can have it or cancel it. I don’t think you’re like this but a lot of folks think that’s unfair. And maybe it is a double standard.
Has carrying pregnancy never not been a woman’s choice. Yes I get slavery and patriarchy but generally the carrying of the child is on her.
If two people aren't married the bulk of the responsibility is ALMOST always on the woman. She carries the baby, she nurses. has to go back to work because she has to provide for her baby,,,,usually with little to no help....list goes onShouldn't both parties have a say so on whether to keep the baby and not just the woman.
You meant to say except the implants, right?It's not one or the other, Mr. Freeman.
NO birth control is 100% effective, except for abstinence. So knowing this, the onus is on both parties to use every method available to them to make sure pregnancy doesn't occur.
Bruh, you asked me did I think it was both people's responsibility to use BC like it's not supposed to be. You didn't summarize
You know what, either your writing style sucks or I can't read and I know the latter isn't true
So you think both parties should have responsibility for preventing pregnancies, but only one party should have any say in determining what happens following the pregnancy?
Hopefully they fall apart, the current moderate Democrats become the new right, and the progressives become the new second party.Does anyone else believe this could be the impetus for the fracture of the Republican party? If so, how long will it take before the Democratic party follows suit?
lol yall all over the fuckin place today
I believe it's a woma's sole decision to abort an unplanned/unwanted pregnancyHere is what I asked you.
The first part is clearly a declarative with the second part being the actual question. I'm not sure how you read that statement and believe the first part is a question. I can break it into two separate statements if that helps.
You think both parties should have responsibility for preventing pregnancies. Do also you believe only one party should have any say in determining what happens following the pregnancy?
I believe it's a woma's sole decision to abort an unplanned/unwanted pregnancy
If by "implants", you mean IUDs, then, I mean that too. 98-99% is not 100%You meant to say except the implants, right?
...right?
What are you ytalking about?Then it should be a man's sole decision on whether he will support the child.
Isn't that fair?
What are you ytalking about?
I clearly said it's a woman's sole decision to abort an unplanned/unwanted pregnancy. You can't tell a woman NOT to have an abortion and kee[p a baby she doesn't want.
That's all I said.
You're ushering in something else that I haven't said anything about.