Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

The Official Raw/Smackdown Live/NXT Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
RodyRod said:
She won the Women's Royal Rumble so they gave her the same stipulation as they do the men
Click to expand...

you missed the point
if asuka decided to challenge for the sd women’s title, she should strictly be on the smackdown brand. there’s no reason for her to be on raw
 
already home_17 said:
you missed the point
if asuka decided to challenge for the sd women’s title, she should strictly be on the smackdown brand. there’s no reason for her to be on raw
Click to expand...
nah that's silly. she isn't drafted to smackdown, she's drafted to Raw. she can just move around like that since she won the rumble. if the writers were smart they'd have her beat Bliss before 'mania and then beat Charlotte at mania so she could have both titles and defend both on both shows for 3 months
 
So there’s no Sasha vs Baylee at mania ... if so trash.

Baylee been looking a lot better lately in the face not so much jay leno anymore.
 
RodyRod said:
nah that's silly. she isn't drafted to smackdown, she's drafted to Raw. she can just move around like that since she won the rumble. if the writers were smart they'd have her beat Bliss before 'mania and then beat Charlotte at mania so she could have both titles and defend both on both shows for 3 months
Click to expand...

so you don’t remember a smackdown wrestler winning the rumble in 04 and challenging for raw’s world title, therefore making him a raw competitor?
 
Sounds like soemthing they did for Cena way back when

All I can say is different times, different rules...and the writers make it up as they go

Take Cena for example, how is he under the WWE umbrella and not tied to a particular brand. The "he deserves it" logic makes no sense. What about RKO, he don't deserve it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top