The official COVID-19/Coronavirus Discussion Thread...aka I hope I don't get the Rona

[TheNightKing]

I think I can't know til I at least see that paper. And u can't know until u see that paper either. So for u to draw conclusions based on the messenger says everything about u as a critical thinker

Ok you go read that paper and give us your expert opinion on if it supports the claim that Fauci and the NIH are responsible for Covid-19.

Admit while you're at it the only reason you're doing so is because Rand brought up the possibility.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

Ok you go read that paper and give us your expert opinion on if it supports the claim that Fauci and the NIH are responsible for Covid-19.

Admit while you're at it the only reason you're doing so is because Rand brought up the possibility.

If u can admit that u don't care what science says unless some figure head u blindly follow is the one force feeding it to u

 

[ChicagoFigure]

I'm convinced most the mfs in here don't read past headlines which is why they think "the science" is over their head when the data is available for anyone to educate themselves

U wanna be force fed an agenda which is fine. But don't push that dumb shit onto everyone else.

 

[B_A]

Fauci “you don’t need a mask”

Fauci “ I lied because I was giving hospitals and first responders time to stock up”

While they told people at McDonalds they were essential. :tuh:

Better to say you lied than admit you don't need a mask. Think how much shit that would stir up.

 

[AP3.0]

 

[ChicagoFigure]

Imagine getting push back bc u wanna see actual data from real scientists before forming an opinion.

 

[TheNightKing]

I'm convinced most the mfs in here don't read past headlines which is why they think "the science" is over their head when the data is available for anyone to educate themselves

U wanna be force fed an agenda which is fine. But don't push that dumb shit onto everyone else.

Please report back once you've read it and enlighten us then. And please stick to whether the paper supports that Fauci and the NIH are responsible for Covid-19 or not.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

Please report back once you've read it and enlighten us then. And please stick to whether the paper supports that Fauci and the NIH are responsible for Covid-19 or not.

I got u fam. I just gotta figure out what paper he's referencing

 

[TheNightKing]

Imagine getting push back bc u wanna see actual data from real scientists before forming an opinion.

Imagine thinking you smarter than the experts that have done this for decades, lol.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

Imagine thinking you smarter than the experts that have done this for decades, lol.

So if my sources are experts than this post means what?

 

[BlackRain]

Yes. U know why? Bc other credible scientists publish findings that contradict what mainstream media regurgitate. Y'all know u don't trust big corporations and big government but here y'all are blindly following them.

Do me a favor bro.....go back to any single one of my posts where I cited a source and tell me if it wasn't info posted by an expert.

That's cool but you didn't answer my question. I didn't ask if you thought the information was credible nor did I state anything for you to say I'm blindly following any one source so calm the defensiveness down. I asked if you think the average person has enough knowledge on the medical field to read these reports and come to an actual conclusion on what is and isn't valid.

 

[Marc123]

Imagine thinking you smarter than the experts that have done this for decades, lol.

Hey he jus asking questions and wants to review the report for himself lol

 

[BlackRain]

If trump was in office pushing vaccines y'all would be the first ones talking about how u don't trust em. And the republicans be the ones ready to die for em.


It's ridiculous

The vaccines were developed while he was in office. That's not really a solid argument....and it's ironic you make it as Trump is now dancing around pushing antivax information because he feels he disnt get enough credit

 

[BlackRain]

Trump said Covid came from a lab leak.

Ppl called him racist

Because his reasons for saying that it came from a lab leak was based in being racist not actual science. That's why people didn't wanna jump on that wave with him.

 

[TheNightKing]

So if my sources are experts than this post means what?

You saying you can draw a conclusion from the paper. So you are the expert at that point, not the people that wrote the paper. The paper doesn't draw a conclusion regarding Fauci and the NIH's responsibility for Covid-19.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

You saying you can draw a conclusion from the paper. So you are the expert at that point, not the people that wrote the paper. The paper doesn't draw a conclusion regarding Fauci and the NIH's responsibility for Covid-19.

Cite your sources bc I've still yet to see this paper. Also I didnt draw any conclusions. The ppl who conducted the study did.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

Because his reasons for saying that it came from a lab leak was based in being racist not actual science. That's why people didn't wanna jump on that wave with him.

So ppl disregarded the message bc of the messenger. All the while the message is becoming more and more plausible. Imagine if we keep letting politics get in the way. We'd be a bunch of dumbasses.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

The vaccines were developed while he was in office. That's not really a solid argument....and it's ironic you make it as Trump is now dancing around pushing antivax information because he feels he disnt get enough credit

Yes trump is full of shit. The science he was referencing is not. Bc they weren't politically affiliated and couldn't give a fuck less what trump thinks.

Is it registering yet?

 

[ChicagoFigure]

That's cool but you didn't answer my question. I didn't ask if you thought the information was credible nor did I state anything for you to say I'm blindly following any one source so calm the defensiveness down. I asked if you think the average person has enough knowledge on the medical field to read these reports and come to an actual conclusion on what is and isn't valid.

I think it's possible. If u are basing your opinion on expert data.

 

[Mr.LV]