Northside7
Active Member
I don't understand the first part of your question.
I don't think most arsenal fans are angry at Chelsea for buying the player. I think most are happy the club didn't drop €100m.
The Official 2022/2023 Football/Soccer Thread
- Thread starter Infamous114
- Start date
-
- Tags
- football
- Status
I don't understand the first part of your question.
I don't think most arsenal fans are angry at Chelsea for buying the player. I think most are happy the club didn't drop €100m.
dontdiedontkillanyone
Show some love, you losers!
He has no idea what to do with Nice but mans is spending money though.
Blue_London
OG
I remember when he took over I thought they were going to be major players
DNB1
OG
RetroLDN
Active Member
Yh some of my arsenal heads are happy and some Chelsea heads are unhappy.
Most of Chelsea's arrivals have 6-9yr contracts and on relatively low wages. Murdyk ,for example, is 88m/8.5yrs. That's under 11m per year and he's only on 100k.
This shows Boelhy is willing take advantage of a practice is rarely utilised in the sport. Also shows his faith in the scouting and coaching department that they won't turn into liabilites, so get used to Potter.
It's also another example of Kroenke's reluctance to spend. Top of the league, now is the time to go for the jugular. 88m for a guy on 100k is peanuts to a club of arsenaL's stature. Having said that, the window isn't closed yet.
DNB1
OG
It’s not like he or his company don’t make money. INEOS make around £65b annually, and Sir Jim is worth £21b. And this is concerning to me, he/they can afford to make Nice be major competitor to PSG but have chosen not to. I understand that the plan may have always been to use it as a feeder club for a bigger club.
They saying Lewis Hamilton is involved, I know he’s been looking to invest in football and since INEOS own a large stake in Mercedes F1 team it’s not surprising.
It’s the beginning of what will be a crazy couple of months but I feel there will be other offers.
I personally am hoping for Dubai to come in
Last edited:
DNB1
OG
Chelsea giving out long contracts might be genius. It extends the players worth, and allows them to get around FFP.
If they wanna sell him in 3-4 years he still has a long contract that has to be taken into consideration. He could be a great player and sell for nearly double the price. Or you keep him for the contract.
It’s more of a risk if the player flops tho..
If they wanna sell him in 3-4 years he still has a long contract that has to be taken into consideration. He could be a great player and sell for nearly double the price. Or you keep him for the contract.
It’s more of a risk if the player flops tho..
Same. But no real organization, just money
Northside7
Active Member
Arsenal was willing to spend what Chelsea spent. The issue wasn't the funds, it's when they would get those funds. You're saying 100k and I heard it was 200k.
And if all of what you said is true, why would Chelsea fans be upset with this?
Has offers been made by guys over there?
toheeb27
OG
We wanted Enzo, lol.
DNB1
OG
I’ve read that there is interest. I’m hoping that now Ratcliffe has gone public a few others will too.
Northside7
Active Member
Blue_London
OG
That was wild
Blue_London
OG
we should bid 10m for saka
dontdiedontkillanyone
Show some love, you losers!
- Status