Welcome To aBlackWeb

COMMUNITY Social Justice Thread: R.I.P. George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor & now Tyre Nichols

Republicans are getting the trained militia on their side

Civilians better get ready, November is gonna be a crazy month
 
Republicans are getting the trained militia on their side

Civilians better get ready, November is gonna be a crazy month

Yep. November prolly gone tear this country apart.

Streets gone be on fire. Then trump will fan the flames to stay in power n prolly will refuse to leave if gets that L.

It definitely wont be a peaceful transition of power.
 
Last edited:
Republicans are getting the trained militia on their side

Civilians better get ready, November is gonna be a crazy month

It's not been easy to get 9mm or 5.56 with all the panic buying.
Had a shop/range in my area go through 4000 9mm rounds in 24hrs.
There's also the possibility of gun stores getting shut down completely like with Ferguson.
And shit hasn't even hit the fan... yet.

If y'all ever planned on getting something for self-defense, might as well now.
It's becoming more evident government tyranny isn't the enemy certain people were worried about.
 


A 13-year-old Pennsylvania boy is to be tried as an adult on first degree murder charges after executing his nine-year-old brother during a game of cops and robbers, according to police.

Brayden Leroy Wright from Waynesboro was charged with first-degree criminal homicide and second-degree aggravated assault on Wednesday, after his little brother was fatally shot in the back of the head.

Police were called to the boys' home at 6am on Wednesday morning after receiving a 911 call from Brayden himself, who told the dispatcher someone had fallen.

When ambulance crews arrived they found the nine-year-old in cardiac arrest, bleeding from a gunshot wound behind his left ear. He later died at hospital.

According to an arrest affidavit by Trooper Erica Polcha, Brayden later admitted he had shot his sibling.

He said he wanted to play cops and robbers, so had retrieved one of the two loaded 9mm handguns their father kept in an unlocked console in the couch in the living room.

But his brother wasn't listening to him, and was lying on the couch watching videos on a cellphone instead.

According to Polcha, Brayden admitted "he pressed the muzzle of the gun to the back left side of the victim's head and squeezed the trigger."

"(He) related he did this because the victim was not complying with his commands while playing cops and robbers. He admitted to being angry with the victim for not listening to him."

The bullet went straight through the boy's skull and out the right side of his head.

Brayden told police he knew there was a round in the chamber, Polcha said.

He said he then put the gun back in the console; police found blood on the muzzle of the gun, and another live round in the chamber.

The boys' father Matthew Snyder told officers he kept the two guns "loaded for home protection", PennLive reported.

The parents, who also have three young daughters, are not currently facing any charges.
 
A 13-year-old Pennsylvania boy is to be tried as an adult on first degree murder charges after executing his nine-year-old brother during a game of cops and robbers, according to police.

Brayden Leroy Wright from Waynesboro was charged with first-degree criminal homicide and second-degree aggravated assault on Wednesday, after his little brother was fatally shot in the back of the head.

Police were called to the boys' home at 6am on Wednesday morning after receiving a 911 call from Brayden himself, who told the dispatcher someone had fallen.

When ambulance crews arrived they found the nine-year-old in cardiac arrest, bleeding from a gunshot wound behind his left ear. He later died at hospital.

According to an arrest affidavit by Trooper Erica Polcha, Brayden later admitted he had shot his sibling.

He said he wanted to play cops and robbers, so had retrieved one of the two loaded 9mm handguns their father kept in an unlocked console in the couch in the living room.

But his brother wasn't listening to him, and was lying on the couch watching videos on a cellphone instead.

According to Polcha, Brayden admitted "he pressed the muzzle of the gun to the back left side of the victim's head and squeezed the trigger."

"(He) related he did this because the victim was not complying with his commands while playing cops and robbers. He admitted to being angry with the victim for not listening to him."

The bullet went straight through the boy's skull and out the right side of his head.

Brayden told police he knew there was a round in the chamber, Polcha said.

He said he then put the gun back in the console; police found blood on the muzzle of the gun, and another live round in the chamber.

The boys' father Matthew Snyder told officers he kept the two guns "loaded for home protection", PennLive reported.

The parents, who also have three young daughters, are not currently facing any charges.
Crazy shit yo

So much has to be taught about gun safety
 

Sound like people who love HOA's




Americans saw the story they wanted to see. Some saw respected professionals fearing for their safety, reasonably exercising their Second Amendment rights to defend their home from violent trespassers. Others saw an overwrought, older affluent couple, recklessly pointing their weapons and asserting their white privilege.
But public records and interviews reveal a fuller picture than emerged two weeks ago. They show the McCloskeys are almost always in conflict with others, typically over control of private property, what people can do on that property, and whose job it is to make sure they do it.


They filed a lawsuit in 1988 to obtain their house, a castle built for Adolphus Busch’s daughter and her husband during St. Louis’ brief run as a world-class city in the early 20th century. At the McCloskeys’ property in Franklin County, they have sued neighbors for making changes to a gravel road and twice in just over two years evicted tenants from a modular home on their property.
Mark McCloskey sued a former employer for wrongful termination and his sister, father and his father’s caretaker for defamation.

The McCloskeys have filed at least two “quiet title” suits asserting squatter’s rights on land they’ve occupied openly and hostilely — their terms — and claimed as their own. In an ongoing suit against Portland Place trustees in 2017, the McCloskeys say they are entitled to a 1,143-square-foot triangle of lawn in front of property that is set aside as common ground in the neighborhood’s indenture.
It was that patch of green protesters saw when they filed through the gate. Mark McCloskey said in an affidavit that he has defended the patch before by pointing a gun at a neighbor who had tried to cut through it.

The McCloskeys have filed many other lawsuits. They sued a man who sold them a Maserati they claimed was supposed to come with a box of hard-to-find parts. In one trip to the courthouse in November 1996, Mark McCloskey filed two lawsuits, one against a dog breeder whom he said sold him a German shepherd without papers and the other against the Central West End Association for using a photo of their house in a brochure for a house tour after the McCloskeys had told them not to.

Mark McCloskey has run off trustees trying to make repairs to the wall surrounding his property, insisting that he and his wife own it. In 2013, he destroyed bee hives placed just outside of the mansion’s northern wall by the neighboring Jewish Central Reform Congregation and left a note saying he did it, and if the mess wasn’t cleaned up quickly he would seek a restraining order and attorneys fees. The congregation had planned to harvest the honey and pick apples from trees on its property for Rosh Hashanah.


Moreover, the McCloskeys have constantly sought to force their neighborhood trustees to maintain the exclusivity of Portland Place, accusing them of selectively enforcing the written rules for living in the neighborhood, known as the trust agreement.
They filed a lawsuit in St. Louis circuit court to try to force the trustees to enforce the neighborhood rules as written. The McCloskeys dismissed the claim, but the judge would not let them refile an amended version because it “failed to allege a justiciable controversy.”
The McCloskeys appealed all the way to the state Supreme Court to try to make the judge allow them to refile their case, but the effort failed.

One of the rules prohibited unmarried people from living together. Several neighbors said it was because the McCloskeys didn’t want gay couples living on the block. The trustees voted to impeach Patricia McCloskey as a trustee in 1992 when she fought an effort to change the trust indenture, accusing her of being anti-gay.

Albert Watkins, a lawyer representing the couple, questioned the relevance of any story delving into the McCloskeys’ litigation history and asked the newspaper to submit written questions. The Post-Dispatch sent questions; Watkins didn’t answer them. Watkins invited a reporter to come to his office to view a document in which McCloskey discussed his litigation history but said a reporter could not have a copy nor take notes from it. Watkins later declined to allow a reporter to interview his clients under the newspaper’s condition that the interview be recorded.

Mark McCloskey’s first taste of ownership may have been on his 20th birthday, in 1976. A card from his parents, Bruce and Lois “Carol” McCloskey, would much later become an exhibit in a lawsuit against his father and his father's trust.

Yooo, yall have to click that link and read that shit. Anytime they have a problem, they literally sue everybody. That mansion they have now, they got it from suing. He sued his accountant, all the partners at the firm and the head of a bank which pissed off his bosses at the firm he worked at. So they asked him to resign. Then he sued his former firm. Theres so much I cant even post it all.
 


1 less white supremacist



This is literally fake news click bait, racists are using.


INDIANAPOLIS – An Indianapolis mother was shot and killed along the canal early Sunday, marking the second homicide on the canal in a week.

According to the victim’s family, the shooting started over some racially charged language.

The victim, Jessica Doty Whitaker, leaves behind a little boy.

“She shouldn’t have lost her life. She’s got a 3-year-old son she loved dearly,” said her fiance Jose Ramirez.

According to Ramirez, he and the victim and two other people were hanging out along the canal when someone in their group used a slang version of the N-word.

That word prompted a confrontation by a group of strangers.

During a brief argument, Ramirez claims the suspect’s group shouted Black Lives Matter and either Whitaker or someone in her group replied that All Lives Matter.

Eventually the two sides separated because they realized they were both armed. The groups then fist bumped and walked away from each other.

However, minutes later Ramirez claims the killer opened fire from a nearby bridge and ran away.


“It was squashed and they went up the hill and left we thought, but they were sitting on St. Clair waiting for us to come under the bridge and that’s when she got shot,” said the victim’s fiancé Jose Ramirez.

Jose admits he returned fire, but didn’t hit anyone. He says explaining to Jessica’s son Greyson that he’ll never see his mom again has been the hardest part for the family.

“It’s hard to tell him his mom is in heaven and if you want to talk to her you have to look up and say, ‘I love you mom,’” said Ramirez.


For their part, Jessica’s family simply wants her killer caught.

“We’re going through a lot. The 3-year-old boy doesn’t even understand really,” said Ramirez. “I just want justice for Jessica and her son and her family.”


An Indiana woman was fatally shot earlier this month following an alleged argument between her family and a group of Black Lives Matter supporters, her family says.

The woman, 24-year-old Jessica Doty Whitaker, was walking along Indianapolis Canal Walk with her fiancé, Jose Ramirez, and two other people around 3 a.m. on July 5 when someone in their group used a racial slur, Fox 59 reported.


A group of nearby strangers overheard the comment and confronted Whitaker’s group, according to the station.

Ramirez alleged that the group shouted “Black Lives Matter,” to which either Whitaker or someone else in their group reportedly responded with, “All Lives Matter.”

A brief argument ensued until both sides separated after realizing the other was armed, Fox 59 reported. Ramirez claimed that both sides managed to resolve the argument before separating.

But minutes later, someone reportedly opened fire from a nearby bridge, striking Whitaker, before running away, the station said.


“It was squashed, and they went up the hill and left we thought, but they were sitting on St. Clair waiting for us to come under the bridge and that’s when she got shot,” Ramirez said.

Ramirez admitted to returning fire but did not hit anyone. He told Fox 59 that he has had to explain what happened to Whitaker’s 3-year-old son.

“It’s hard to tell him his mom is in heaven and if you want to talk to her you have to look up and say, ‘I love you mom,’” Ramirez said.

Police have not independently verified whether the supposed argument over “Black Lives Matter” occurred or if the fatal shooting was even connected.


Also the one who said she got killed for saying "all lives matter" was her father in an interview. And thats what certain outlets are running with for clicks
 


ALEXANDER, Ark. (WNCN) — Arkansas State Police arrested and charged a former police officer in the shooting death of a fellow officer.

Calvin Salyers, a 33-year-old officer in Alexander, Arkansas surrendered on a manslaughter charge in the June 3 shooting that killed Officer Scott Hutton, 36, state police said. A judge set his bond at $15,000.

On June 3, Hutton wounded by a gunshot and was found lying outside of a residence.

Arkansas Special Agent Ryan Jacks wrote in an arrest affidavit that Hutton had driven to Salyers’ home shortly after 7 p.m. on that day to pick up a patrol car from Salyers, which was parked inside a metal structure nearby.

According to court documents, Salyers allegedly told another officer that just after the “riots in Minneapolis” he would “shoot through the door” if any protesters showed up at his home. The officer told Salyers that he could not shoot anyone without identifying them first and identify that there was a threat.

When Hutton arrived at Salyers’ home, he texted him, “are you awake,” Jacks wrote. When he didn’t get a response, Hutton walked to the front door and knocked. Inside, Salyers was watching a movie with his girlfriend, Ashlee Cummings. He was off duty at the time.


Jacks goes on to say that Salyers told Cummings he would check who was at the door and grabbed his Glock .40-caliber handgun. He looked through the peephole and saw a “figure standing on his porch with a dark shirt and a gun on his hip”.

Salyers told investigators that he tried to transfer his weapon to his other hand to greet the person at the door. However, he said that when he did, the gun fired, striking Hutton in the chest.

He was transported to a Little Rock hospital where he was later pronounced dead, according to Arkansas State Police.

Hutton had been dressed in a black polo shirt with khaki tactical pants and his police-style gun belt and his weapon holstered.

The affidavit reads that the bullet hole appeared to have contact residue, indicating that the weapon was pressed against the door when fired.

Salyers had been with the Alexander Police Department since 2017.
 
WTF?!

What kinda fucked up situation is this?!

They are charging him with manslaughter presumably because they believe his story about the shooting being accidental when he was transferring the gun from one hand to another. Seems their conclusion that the gun was pressed up against the door when it went off would dispute that claim though.
 
Back
Top