Should Only #1 and #2 Options Be In the HOF?
- Thread starter Goldie
- Start date
mryounggun
OG
I get why people think GA be talking out his ass. He's just really bad at getting his point across.
Gilbert arenas lmao
nobody values his opinion
Him and that unfunny piece of shit Josiah
nobody values his opinion
Him and that unfunny piece of shit Josiah
It depends. But i understand the point. You have people like Rodman and Ben Wallace in the hall, and Draymond is probably going to get in.
Dwayne
Laissez le bon temps rouler
HOF needs to be revamped.
First it should just be the NBA HOF
It’s already got players that don’t belong in there, like Ben Wallace and a bunch of others. They let everybody in.
It’s no way a player like Rodman should be sharing the same building as a player like Kobe. No damn way
First it should just be the NBA HOF
It’s already got players that don’t belong in there, like Ben Wallace and a bunch of others. They let everybody in.
It’s no way a player like Rodman should be sharing the same building as a player like Kobe. No damn way
LexDiamond1995
master manipulator
It's happened already with Ginoboli right
Bosh
Would Ginobli be looked at the same as a #1 option?
Bosh was the #1 option for a min before Bron made a super team.
Ehhh I mean he was #1 option by default and if he never lead his team anywhere as a #1 option then he’s not one imo
But I’ll defer to you
I ain’t gonna go back and forth off of nochill Gil lol
Define leading your team somewhere
He was a 4 time Allstar
Sounds like Kemba WalkerHe was a 4 time Allstar
I was about to line you up.
PhenomTheMac
OG
Rodman, bosh, Manu, dray, ray, worthy, Dennis Johnson all say no.
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
What about Robert Horry? He was probably never even a 3rd option, but bruh got 7 championships and maybe 3 of those championships wouldn't have happened without big shots from him. In other words, he was a role player, but that role was important.
Also, what about somebody like Steve Kerr. Again, he wasn't ever even as high as a 3rd option, but he played an important role on a couple very successful teams. On top of that, prior to Curry, he had numbers that put him the discussion for greatest 3 pt. shooter ever. Does being the best ever at something get you in the HoF discussion even if you were never really a superstar?
Also, what about somebody like Steve Kerr. Again, he wasn't ever even as high as a 3rd option, but he played an important role on a couple very successful teams. On top of that, prior to Curry, he had numbers that put him the discussion for greatest 3 pt. shooter ever. Does being the best ever at something get you in the HoF discussion even if you were never really a superstar?