Welcome To aBlackWeb

Only a few bad apples huh?...Bad Cops Thread



http://www.wect.com/story/38914976/...ce-actions-caught-on-video-were-not-justified

NAACP says Raleigh police actions caught on video were not justified

The mother of the Raleigh man caught on camera in a video of police officers using force is speaking out as local NAACP leaders call for a full investigation.

Rev. Doris Tomberlin said the hardest part for her is not knowing about her son, Frederick Hall.

"It's not an easy pill to swallow," said Tomberlin who has not been able to visit her son in the hospital.

Family and members of the Raleigh-Apex NAACP are calling for a full investigation of what took place in the videos, making sure nothing falls between the cracks.

Activists said they've been in touch with Raleigh's police chief and the Wake County District Attorney, and are encouraging anyone with more videos of what took place to send them to the DA.

"Both sides of the story need to come forth to the community," Rev. Dr. Portia Rochelle, Raleigh-Apex NAACP President said. "We weren't there."

Two videos taken by a witness obtained by CBS 17 show Hall on the ground with six officers surrounding him. One officer can be seen striking his back with a baton at least a dozen times.

nother video taken by Bonnie Kidder shows the 44-year-old Hall swinging at police, while three officers surround him.

Kidder told CBS 17 she believes what the officers did may have been justified.

Rochelle and others said that's not the case.

When asked, Rochelle said they believed what happened Friday was not justified.

She and family members said one of the hardest things for them has been not being allowed to see Hall, adding the most information they've been given is that, "he's alive."

"What kind of rule would deny her mother to see a child?" Rochelle said in a news conference Saturday.

"The mother doesn't know what condition he's in. She doesn't know if he's on life support, or if he's sitting up drinking a Coke. She needs to see for herself."

Rochelle also spoke about police officer training.

"We're tired of the beatings," Rochelle said. "They are trained to handle a person that's out of control, without beating them and putting them into the hospital, and maiming them."

"One person swinging their arms does not justify the use of force from a mob of law enforcement, in order to subdue this person," Rev. Shawn Singleton said. "Law enforcement's job is not to inflict punishment because you're fighting back or resisting."

Many are now working to find answers and justice for Hall and his family.

"I don't judge nobody, but I pray for the police force," Tomberlin said. "I want them to understand that they have children too, and what goes around, comes around."

CBS 17 reached out to Raleigh Police, who say they were told by WakeMed hospital staff that their policy does not allow Hall to have visitors at this time.

Police also said Hall had an encounter in 2016 with the North Carolina State Highway Patrol.

CBS 17 reached out to North Carolina State Highway Patrol officials for more information regarding this encounter.

Raleigh police released a statement Friday afternoon:

The Raleigh Police Department is aware of the incident that occurred earlier today at Garner Road and Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard; we are reviewing the matter in accordance with our departmental policies. In the spirit of transparency, we have proactively made the District Attorney’s office aware of this situation. The Raleigh Police Department offers no further comment on this ongoing investigation.

Late Friday afternoon Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman released this statement:

Late this afternoon I was made aware of a use of force incident regarding Raleigh Police Department by the chief of police for Raleigh. I have requested that all available video including body cameras and dash cam video be provided to my office for review. I am in consultation with the state Bureau of investigation and once we have completed a review, will be making a determination as to what the appropriate next steps are. We are requesting the community's patience as we go through this process.
 

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local...cle_20397aa4-113b-5462-8ae3-78a606ecd655.html

St. Louis police union posts $30K bond for officer accused of breaking man's jaw with flashlight

ST. LOUIS • The St. Louis Police Officers' Association posted the $30,000 bail for one of its own Thursday after the officer was booked on charges of assault and armed criminal action.

Prosecutors charged Officer Adam Feaman, 40, accusing him of striking a man in the head with a flashlight, breaking his jaw, in August 2017. Judge Madeline Connolly set Feaman's bail at $30,000, cash-only.

The man, Jamal White, filed a civil lawsuit in federal court in April claiming Feaman used excessive force during the arrest on suspicion of a peace disturbance and resisting arrest. A cellphone video of the incident appears to show White trying to back away from Feaman when he was struck.

The police union has bailed out its members who have been criminally charged in the past, including Jason Stockley, who was charged and subsequently acquitted of first-degree murder in the 2011 shooting of a drug suspect.

The union's Business Manager Jeff Roorda said the union's executive board decides on a case-by-case basis which members it will bail out.

"As an organization, we believe our members have the same rights as everyone else, the right to post a bond and the right to remain innocent until proven guilty," he said.

The incident began when White came out of his apartment in the 1500 block of Locust Street to find out why police were having his car towed, according to White's lawsuit.

Feaman has been on the force since 2003. He was suspended from the department Wednesday when charges were issued.

His attorney, Brian Millikan, has declined comment.
 
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/08...-oakland-police-shooting-officially-complete/

Oakland: Why did it take more than 10 years for DA to release report on fatal officer-involved shooting?

OAKLAND — Whenever a police officer kills a civilian, the Alameda County District Attorney performs an in-depth investigation to determine if the shooting was justified, and if not, whether criminal charges should be filed. But one investigation of a fatal shooting on an unarmed man on New Year’s Even 2007 has languished for more than a decade. And another report, of a fatal shooting by the same rookie officer just months later, took six years to complete.

The lapses raise serious questions about the DA’s conduct in these cases, legal experts say, especially since a review shows that most of these reports are completed within two years. It took a public records request by this news organization for the DA’s office to admit it hadn’t finalized the report on the 10-year-old shooting. Spurred by the news organization’s inquiry, the report finally was delivered to Oakland police Tuesday. It will be available to the public this week, a spokeswoman said.

No law requires a district attorney to investigate killings by police, according to legal analyst and former Santa Clara prosecutor Steven Clark. But published reports of these investigations, as conducted by each of the Bay Area’s DAs, provide the public a critical, independent glimpse of what occurred during the shootings.

Defense attorneys in the two Alameda County cases, as well as a retired judge, said the delays were appalling and called into question how seriously Alameda County prosecutors take police shootings. In each case, the men were unarmed — one was shot in the back while running away from officers.

The Oakland Police Department didn’t wait for the DA’s report. After the second shooting, Oakland officer Hector Jimenez was fired. But Jimenez won his job back through arbitration, and is still on the force today.

“I have never seen anything like it,” said LaDoris Cordell, a retired Santa Clara judge and former San Jose police auditor. “There’s no words they can come up with to excuse this behavior. If the Board of Supervisors are not outraged by this, the community and the attorneys will be.”

In Alameda County, the investigation is not considered complete until the elected district attorney, currently Nancy O’Malley, sends a final report of its findings to the police chief.

In the case of 20-year-old Andrew Moppin-Buckskin, who died Dec. 31, 2007, Alameda County DA spokeswoman Teresa Drenick said investigators handling the case finished the report in 2013, more than five years after the shooting, but the office did not realize it had failed to forward the report to Oakland police until the request by this news agency sent them looking for it.

“We believe that the delay in completing a report was due, in part, to the fact that the federal government was reviewing the matter,” Drenick wrote in an email. “In addition, between the time that the investigation began and was completed, there was a change in the DA Administration as well as in our policy regarding the release of OIS reports.”

In 2009, O’Malley took over for retiring DA Tom Orloff, who did not release officer-involved shooting reports to the public, as O’Malley does, Drenick said.

Moppin-Buckskin was shot and killed by Jimenez and officer Jessica Borello at 47th Avenue and International Boulevard. He earlier ran from a car after a traffic stop and hid underneath a parked Ford Explorer, according to court records contained in his family’s federal lawsuit. After he refused to emerge with his hands raised, Jimenez threatened to shoot him if he didn’t walk toward the officers, court records show. Moppin-Buckskin replied, “I don’t give a f— if you shoot me, I’ve been shot before.”

Police shot him multiple times after he reached toward his back waistband, records state. The internal affairs review by Oakland police found the officers did not violate any policies. Six months later on July 25, 2008, Jimenez was involved in another fatal shooting, of Mack “Jody” Woodfox along Fruitvale Avenue. Woodfox was unarmed and shot in the back as he ran away from a traffic stop.

A DA investigation completed nearly six years later, on May 28, 2014, and released under the same records request, determined the shooting was justified and that Jimenez feared for the safety of his partner, Joel Aylworth. In an interview with investigators, Jimenez said a police spotlight obscured his vision so he could not see if Woodfox was armed as he ran with his right hand near his waistband, according to the DA report.

However, OPD fired Jimenez in 2009 for his conduct in the Woodfox incident, though the department has not specifically said why. The officer won his job back through arbitration two years later. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the family of Moppin-Buckskin but the city settled a lawsuit Woodfox’s family had filed for $650,000. Civil rights attorney Jim Chanin, who along with John Burris represented the families in the separate lawsuits, said both police shootings were questionable and also criticized the delay in the reports.

“Let’s say they found criminal culpability,” Chanin said. “That meant someone would have been able to walk around for nine, 10, 11 years before they were charged. Justice delayed is justice denied.”

The district attorney’s investigations, which run parallel to the police department’s probe, can take time, but a review of several cases in the past 10 years shows many were completed within two years. “Each incident is unique and complex,” said Drenick. The Alameda DA does not set a specific time limit on investigations.

But its delay in completing the two cases involving Jimenez raised questions of transparency. David Snyder, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, said the reports are one of the few avenues the public has to obtain facts about a police shooting. California law shields the public from internal affairs investigations conducted by within individual police departments.

“An officer involved shooting is by definition an event the public has heightened interest in. It is an instance where the police have exercised the extraordinary power they’ve been given by the people to injure or potentially end someone’s life,” Snyder said. “It requires extraordinary oversight and transparency. You can’t have oversight without transparency.”

“Delays can be a kind of a denial of public access,” he added.
 
https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials...d-guilty-of-murder-in-shooting-death-of-teen/

Fmr Police Officer Roy Oliver Found Guilty of Murder in Shooting Death of Unarmed Black Teenager

A jury has reached a verdict in the trial of Balch Springs, Texas police officer Roy Oliver, finding him guilty of murder for the fatal shooting of teenager Jordan Edwards on April 29, 2017.

Oliver and Officer Tyler Gross had responded to a report of drunk juveniles and found teens leaving a house party on the night in question. Oliver claimed that he saw a car moving towards fellow officer Tyler Gross, ignoring commands to stop. Fearing for Gross’ life, Oliver said, he fired at the car, where Edwards and other teens had been riding.

Taking the stand in his own defense, Oliver told the court that he had heard what sounded like gun shots when he arrived to the scene, and that people in the crowd were fleeing. He said that he noticed Officer Gross approaching the vehicle and exhibiting a particularly concerned demeanor, leading Oliver to think that the shots could have been coming from the car. Oliver said that Gross yelled at the car to stop moving, and when it stopped, only to suddenly start again in Gross’ direction, he fired to protect the officer.

“I was in shock,” Oliver said. “I was in shock for days.”

Officer Gross had a different story, testifying that he was not in fear for his life when Oliver fired his weapon. Additionally, there was video showing that the car was really driving away from Gross, not towards him, and court records said that Oliver had “flipped off” the car Edwards was in following the shooting.

Oddly enough, the jury found Oliver not guilty of the lesser counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon by a public servant.
 
http://www2.philly.com/philly/news/...-racial-letter-internal-affairs-20180828.html

Philly Police commissioner: Homicide detective under internal review for racially charged letter


A Philadelphia police homicide detective is under internal investigation for allegedly calling a colleague a "filthy savage" and a "grotesque, primal animal" in a letter about leaving leftover food beneath a work station, a situation that devolved into a series of racially charged insults, Police Commissioner Richard Ross said Tuesday.

Ross said the letter, written by a white homicide detective and 22-year veteran of the force, was taped above a trash can in the Homicide Unit in recent days. It was not addressed to any specific officer, Ross said, but other members of the unit, concerned about the language in the letter, made copies and shared it among colleagues.

Among other insults, the letter says: "As I'm sure you were not burdened by significant schooling, and were birthed to an alcoholic, absent father and a rancid whore of a mother, you are simply ignorant of the fact that you are little more than an upright animal," according to a copy obtained by the Inquirer and Daily News.

"The tone and the tenor of the letter raise questions about whether racial bias or inappropriate biases … were involved with the message," Ross said at a news conference. "Some of the references in the letter are very troubling."

Rochelle Bilal, president of the Guardian Civic League, an organization that represents black officers, said Tuesday that she believed the letter's language was "basically geared toward the stereotype of black people and black families."

"Anybody in this institution of service to the community that makes any of these statements like this shouldn't be on the job," Bilal said Tuesday.

John McNesby, president of Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5, said of the letter: "There's no place for that. If you have a problem with somebody … you should address it personally."

The commissioner's announcement came about eight months after a group of black narcotics officers sued the Police Department over allegations of racial discrimination. And two years ago, the department came under intense scrutiny when photos of an officer's tattoo — which critics said resembled a Nazi eagle — surfaced on social media.

Ross said the situation Tuesday was "totally different" from the narcotics lawsuit at least. Still, he said the Police Department administers training intended to enable officers to recognize their own biases in order to avoid acting on them. He also acknowledged that the letter contained phrases that "cause me deep concern."

"We do have a higher standard that we have to live up to," Ross said. "And so, when people want to hold us to a higher standard, I think they're right to do so."

Bilal shared with the Inquirer and Daily News a copy of the letter, which she said she received Tuesday. It is addressed only to "fellow coworker" and is signed by Detective Jimmy Crone. It begins by complaining about leftover ribs in a wastebasket beneath a work station, but in the next sentence says: "Now, in that I have a sense of etiquette and social fluency instilled in me from my upbringing by traditional, caring parents, I am offended by this."

After insulting the unnamed colleague's parents and education level, the letter says: "I am not in any manner trying to embarrass you, just the opposite; I'm here to offer my guidance and assistance in helping you make the difficult transition from a grotesque, primal animal to tolerable coworker."

Crone could not immediately be reached for comment.

Ross said that Crone admitted writing the letter, but that it was not clear if Crone knew who had created the mess that evidently enraged him. The commissioner did say he was "perplexed" that a seemingly mundane office dispute would generate such rancor from a seasoned detective.

"I just think the language [of the letter] did not, in any way, fit the offense," Ross said.

He said black members of the Homicide Unit — which he described as about 50 percent African American — were offended by the letter's wording, "some of which historically has references to African Americans in particular."

The commissioner said Crone was generally well-respected and did not appear to have been the subject of many complaints during his two-decade career, 12 years of which he has spent in homicide. Among his assigned cases during that time, news reports show he helped to investigate a faith-healing couple charged with allowing their infant son to die instead of seeking treatment, and a 25-year-old man charged with killing two women — one of whom was known as "Grandma" — over their alleged drug stash.

Ross said Crone would be placed on administrative duty pending an investigation by Internal Affairs.

6E4WJ4N7SNHSZAT6KHV35WBE74.jpg
 
https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law...ings-georgia-the-rise/FdNu4qajEvFUN1KPeYwH1M/

Deadly officer-involved shootings in Georgia on the rise

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation is trying to learn more about the circumstances that cause officer-involved shootings amid the deadliest year for the incidents in the past five years.

According to data from the GBI, there have been more deadly officer-involved shootings so far in 2018 than in any year since 2012 — and there are still four months left to go before the year is over.

Since Jan. 1, the GBI has opened 33 investigations into deadly officer-involved shootings, a number already exceeding 30 deadly officer shootings last year. The years 2016 and 2015 had 27 and 29 deadly shootings, respectively.

Whether or not officers are prosecuted depends on the GBI investigations, which are then sent to district attorneys to review.

The GBI and the Georgia Public Safety Training Center are trying to understand the circumstances that lead to deadly police shootings. That’s a task made more difficult by the dearth of available data on these incidents, said Jon Shane, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York.

Nationally, there’s very little research on cases of deadly police shootings, but Shane is looking for patterns so that officers will be better equipped to handle confrontations.

“We know the number (of deadly shootings) has increased this year, and it is still very troubling to us,” said Dwayne Orrick, director of the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police. “Only one in one thousand police encounters involve use of force.”

The GPSTC trains all state and local public safety agencies in Georgia. A key part of officer training is when and how to use force, which can be anything from a raised fist to pepper spray to a gun. Through an eight-hour class and multiple simulations, officers learn to make decisions about when and what kind of force to use.

According to Chadd Wilson, an instructor with the training center, many incidents involving force used by law enforcement in Georgia are justifiable events.

“Any time an officer has to use force, it is troubling,” he said, “but it’s not alarming unless it is not justifiable.”

Wilson said Georgia’s police academy, like most police academies, looks to the U.S. Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor as a precedent for the use of force. In the 1989 case, Dethorne Graham asked his friend to drive him to a convenience store to buy orange juice. He was in a hurry; the diabetic man was trying to counteract an insulin reaction. Graham walked into the store and left quickly, deciding that going to a friend’s house would be faster than waiting in line.

Connor, a police officer in Charlotte, N.C., was suspicious of Graham entering and leaving the store so quickly. He followed Graham, stopped him and his friend, handcuffed him and ignored Graham’s attempts to explain his condition. After the encounter, Graham was left with bruises, cuts and a broken foot. He filed a claim against Connor.

But the Supreme Court ruled in Connor’s favor.

The court ruled the use of “physical coercion or threat thereof” is often necessary when law enforcement officers are making a stop or arrest. The court also wrote that what constitutes a reasonable use of force is subjective and can’t be precisely defined.

“The side of the road is not the place to try your court case,” Wilson said. If a person resists arrest, regardless of whether they have a reason for being arrested, the person should comply or face an officer using force, he said.

That case is often considered by investigators and prosecutors trying to determine if an officer was justified in a shooting or police slaying. said GBI Director Vernon Keenan. He added the “outcome of most cases is that the officer was legally justified.”

Keenan cited drug use as a factor in many deadly confrontations with police. “In many of these cases the deceased had been using drugs,” Keenan said. “You have a combination of illegal drugs, mental health issues and a person that has a firearm having a disregard for the authority of law enforcement.”

Keenan said that the GBI’s ability to fully study the deadly officer-involved shootings is limited by the organization’s lack of resources to close other cases involving police use of force. The GBI must be involved anytime an oficer fires his gun, but they are also called upon to investigate some “use of force” cases.

“We investigate force other than firearms,” Keenan said of the GBI. “We work so many of these cases that we train all of our agents on how to conduct the cases.”

This year the GBI opened 75 investigations into officers’ use of force, including deadly shootings, but only six of those cases have been completed. Only 48 of the 116 cases from 2017 are closed. The 137 remaining cases are still being investigated.

Every one of the GBI’s agents are trained to investigate use of force cases, following a protocol “developed by us based on our years of experience working these cases,” Keenan said.

An investigator is supposed to learn the name of and interview every officer on the scene, interview the suspect involved in the shooting and pull any available video footage from police body cameras and dashboard cameras. A single investigation can take anywhere from six months to a year.

The GBI said it does not perform analysis or study trends in the cases it investigates — that would require resources that the GBI just doesn’t have, Kennan said. It is currently in negotiation with Shane for him to do a research project looking for commonalities in deadly shootings and in other “use of force” cases involving officers injuring suspects, but not killing them.

A better understanding of the incidents might lead to changes in the way law officers in the state are trained on how and when to use force, Keenan said.
 
https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/09/fired_police_officer_charged_w.html

Fired police officer charged with homicide for on-duty shooting

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- A fired white Philadelphia police officer has been charged with criminal homicide for fatally shooting a black man in the back after a confrontation last year over a dirt bike.

The district attorney said Tuesday that former Officer Ryan Pownall is also charged with reckless endangerment.

Pownall had confronted 30-year-old David Jones for riding a dirt bike on a city street on June 8, 2017.

Prosecutors said that when Pownall frisked Jones he felt a gun, which led to a scuffle. Pownall then tried to shoot Jones but his gun jammed.

Surveillance footage showed Jones then putting his gun on the ground and running, and Pownall opening fire, shooting Jones in the back.

Police said last year that only Pownall's first attempt to shoot Jones was justified. Jones was dismissed from the department after the shooting last year.

The police union planned to comment on the charges later Tuesday.
 
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/video-...-tased-girl-commenting-about-black-community/

Video shows Cincinnati officer who tased girl make comment about "black community"


CINCINNATI -- A Cincinnati police officer who used a stun gun on an 11-year-old black girl accused of shoplifting told her that actions like hers hurts the "community," according to body camera footage of the arrest. "You know, sweetheart, this is why there's no grocery stores in the black community," said Officer Kevin Brown on a comment caught by his body camera, CBS affiliate WKRC-TV reported.

The comment resulted in an internal investigation that found that Brown - who is also black - violated department policies. It marks the second time Brown has been accused of making inappropriate comments while on duty, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer, which said he was previously written up for using a homophobic slur in reference to a domestic violence victim.

Body camera footage of the Aug. 6 arrest of the 11-year-old shows her crying after Brown deploys his stun gun.

Brown violated four policies, according to the police department's investigation, including making prejudiced comments and not warning the girl he was going to use the stun gun.

The report has infuriated Cincinnati officials, who have expressed concern about the girl's treatment from the start.

"I just don't know if you have room on the police department for people like this. This guy, from what I am hearing, has serious issues," said Wendell Young, a city councilman and former police officer.

Cincinnati Police Union President Dan Hils defended Brown's statement to the girl, WKRC reported.

"This was nothing more than an African-American police officer talking to the girl in a fatherly way," Hils said.

Brown's punishment is up to Police Chief Eliot Isaac, who can make a determination after an internal departmental hearing.

The officer is currently on restricted duties.

Punishment could range from counseling to dismissal, and Brown would have the right to appeal either one.
 
Back
Top