Welcome To aBlackWeb

Only a few bad apples huh?...Bad Cops Thread

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/07/us/lancaster-police-taser-black-man.html

Officer Who Fired Stun Gun at Unarmed Black Man Will Not Be Suspended


A Pennsylvania police officer who was recorded using a Taser on an unarmed black man in a widely shared video will not be fired or suspended, officials said.

Danene Sorace, the mayor of Lancaster, Pa., acknowledged at a news conference on Friday that some members of the community would find the decision “extremely upsetting.”

“So who is accountable?” she asked. “I am. I am accountable, as mayor, for existing policies, procedures, training, hiring practices and more. It’s on me.”

The episode, which took place on June 28, remains under investigation by the police and the prosecutor’s office. Preliminary findings showed that the officer complied with use of force and Taser policies, which allow an officer to use force when a suspect fails to respond to multiple verbal commands, Ms. Sorace said.

Video of the episode has been viewed more than 2.8 million times on Facebookand more than 6.2 million times on Twitter.

The footage showed the officer, Philip Bernot, repeatedly asking Sean D. Williams to straighten his legs as Mr. Williams was sitting on a curb.

“Legs straight out or you’re getting Tased,” Officer Bernot said.

Mr. Williams started to straighten his legs. Another person can be heard yelling, “Put your legs straight out and cross them now.”

Mr. Williams started to bend his knees, bringing the soles of his feet together, and Officer Bernot, who was standing behind Mr. Williams, used the stun gun on him.

Hundreds of people attended a rally the next day to protest the officer’s actions.

Officer Bernot could not be reached for comment on Saturday, but the Lancaster City Bureau of Police described in a statement what happened in the moments before.

Officers stopped Mr. Williams after receiving a 911 call about a man with a baseball bat, the police said. When one of the officers arrived, there was no bat to be found, but the officer saw three people telling Mr. Williams to get away from them, the statement said.

The officer told Mr. Williams “several times” to sit down and he refused to comply, the police said. Instead, he kept asking a woman in the group to give back his Social Security card.

A couple of minutes later, Officer Bernot arrived and instructed Mr. Williams to sit on the curb, the police said. The group of people later told the police that Mr. Williams had exhibited “erratic behavior” and “wanted to fight.”

The police said Mr. Williams was found to have an outstanding criminal warrant for possession of a controlled substance and public drunkenness. He was arraigned and released on $5,000 bail.

One of Mr. Williams’s lawyers, Brian R. Mildenberg, said on Saturday that it was “outrageous” Officer Bernot would not be “removed from the streets” pending an investigation, and that the commands Mr. Williams received from the officers were inconsistent.

“On behalf of my client, I reiterate our respectful demand that this police officer be suspended pending this investigation,” Mr. Mildenberg said. “He was completely peaceful and compliant and there was absolutely no reason to use violence upon his person.”

The Lancaster branch of the N.A.A.C.P. also rejected Ms. Sorace’s account of the officer’s actions.

In a statement on Facebook on Friday, it called on Lancaster officials to take “immediate action,” including disciplinary measures against Officer Bernot and better training.

Mr. Williams is suing Lancaster and Officer Bernot for violating his civil rights and using excessive force, according to a complaint filed in federal court on Monday. Mr. Williams’s lawyers also hope to obtain a federal court order mandating police reforms and additional training, Mr. Mildenberg said.

According to Ms. Sorace, the city’s policies regarding use of force were already being revised before the episode involving Mr. Williams. Under the proposed new policy, “an officer will only be able to use a Taser when faced with direct physical confrontation,” she said.

She also vowed to introduce body cameras and recruit a police force “that looks more like the community that it serves,” among other changes.

“I am sorry for the hurt, pain and turmoil this incident has caused for all involved,” she said.
 
https://lancasteronline.com/news/lo...cle_d813d858-813b-11e8-858e-d372585a0a8a.html

Mayor: Lancaster city police officer who fired stun gun at Sean Williams will not be fired or suspended

A Lancaster city police officer who used a Taser on an unarmed 27-year-old city resident last week will not be fired or suspended, Mayor Danene Sorace said Friday.

Sorace said the Lancaster Bureau of Police's internal investigation was not finished but it was clear that Officer Philip Bernot complied with current use-of-force and Taser policies.

The policies authorize stun guns in "various situations, including a failure to respond to multiple verbal commands," however Sorace said policy changes would be coming to escalate the threshold.

Under the new policy, she said, "an officer will only be able to use the Taser when faced with direct physical confrontation."

In a Facebook video that was viewed more than 2.8 million times in the last week, Bernot is seen using the Taser on city resident Sean Williams as he was seated on a South Prince Street curb and moving his legs while Bernot and other officers issued orders.

The video gained national attention, and Williams, who is black, has since filed a federal lawsuit alleging excessive force, inadequate medical attention and racial profiling.

"I am sorry for the hurt, pain and turmoil this incident has caused for all involved," Sorace said in an emotional moment during a speech at City Hall. "What took place here last Thursday has thrust our city into a spotlight so bright that initially it was difficult for me to find the opportunity. I feel such a deep and profound responsibility to this community to binding up the hurt, addressing the concerns and implementing the changes I have outlined."

A replay of the mayor's comments is available below.

Community reacts
Williams’ attorney, Brian R. Mildenberg, said it was “outrageous” that Bernot would not be suspended during the investigation.

“There has been an outpouring of demand for this officer to be taken off the street from large numbers of persons all over the world, due to the now infamous act of shooting an unarmed, peaceful and compliant man in the back with a Taser weapon,” Mildenberg said.

Bernot declined to comment, according to a police spokesman. Police Chief Jarrad Berkihiser said the mayor’s statement was clear and that he could not comment further pending litigation.

Community activists who had spoken out about the issue were disappointed Bernot would not face disciplinary action. Many said they were looking forward to the upcoming policy changes.

Blanding Watson, president of the Lancaster NAACP, said his group has met this week with Williams and officials from the city as well as the Department of Justice.

“Throughout the meetings and conversations, no reasonable justification for the officer’s behavior has been provided,” Watson said. “The video shows Mr. Williams was sitting on the ground and received conflicting orders.”

He said the police department’s “defensive statements” have been “disturbing.” His group is asking for revised use-of-force policies that are available online, data collection on use of force, civilian review boards with subpoena powers, increased police training and more.

Kevin Ressler, co-founder of the Lancaster Action Now Coalition, said, “We do not understand how one can be exonerated before the investigation is concluded unless the investigation is a coverup.”

Ressler was one of the organizers for a rally in which 200 people protested the use of force.

City Councilman Ismail Smith-Wade-El, who spoke at the rally, said it was “extremely disappointing” that under the existing policy there couldn’t be a “meaningful punishment.”

“The administration’s choice was to focus on the structural issues, the policy in fact that says this kind of behavior is acceptable, which though it doesn’t sort of satisfy my personal emotions on the matter, I think this is ultimately better.”

Eliza Booth, of Lancaster Stands Up, said she was pleased with the upcoming changes but wished more could have been done in this instance.

“We understand that the existing policy is in place,” Booth said. “(Sorace) still has the power to fire him regardless of what they could do and so personally I wish that would have occurred.”

Investigation continues, policy changes
Police arrested Williams at the scene of the June 28 incident on an outstanding warrant on charges of possession of a controlled substance and public drunkenness. He was later released on unsecured bail.

The materials gathered in the city's investigation will be sent to the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office for the completion of its independent review to determine if any criminal conduct occurred, Sorace said.

Besides changing the existing Taser policy — which the mayor said was already in the works before the incident — Sorace reiterated plans to launch a body camera program by the end of the year.

The city will also create a panel of community leaders to be "an integral part" in reviewing the use-of-force and body camera policies, she said.

Ressler said he has offered to serve on the community review board to fix the “deeply concerning” current process.

"The community trust was bent by the initial tasing incident, that trust is at best being held by a tether because the community is being toyed with as if we have not eyes nor ears."

Sorace also said a series of community meetings is being planned to address police and community relations, as the city works with the NAACP, the Department of Justice's community relations services, and a community relations team from Erie, Pennsylvania.

"I too understand the anger and upset that has come from all corners of our city and our nation," Sorace said. "I recognize that the outrage is not just about one incident; it’s about hundreds of years of history, painful history."

Sorace said the process Lancaster is undertaking will take months or years and require "difficult conversations and sometimes painful self-awareness for all involved."

"Long after the national cameras have moved on, long after this moment is over, this community will still be here, we will still be here, and that gives me hope, because Lancaster, I know that we can do this work together, and that it will take all of us," she said.
 
https://au.news.yahoo.com/calls-calm-french-police-killing-sparks-riots-101956425--spt.html

French policeman on manslaughter charge as shooting sparks riots

A French policeman who shot dead a young black man in western France, sparking four nights of rioting, has been charged with manslaughter, his lawyer said as clashes between youths and police raged into early Saturday.

The unrest has shone a light on tensions in deprived urban areas of France, where local youths often complain about heavy-handed policing and brutality.

The officer had initially claimed he acted in self-defence while trying to arrest the 22-year-old in the city of Nantes on Tuesday, but later told investigators he had fired his weapon by accident.

"He recognises he made a statement that did not conform with the truth," his lawyer Laurent-Franck Lienard told AFP.

The victim, identified as Aboubakar Fofana, died from a single bullet wound to the neck on Tuesday evening after police stopped him in his car in the Breil neighbourhood of Nantes -- home to a large public housing estate with a history of gang violence.

Police initially said that Aboubakar, who was under surveillance for suspected drug trafficking, had resisted arrest and tried to reverse his car into an officer.

But a witness who spoke to AFP said the car was stationary when the policeman opened fire.

The policeman, who has been granted conditional release, told the IGPN police oversight body under questioning that "it was an accidental shot" that killed Aboubakar.

- Tensions -

Some 35 more vehicles were torched in Nantes before dawn Saturday in the fourth night of rioting, after gangs of youths set fire to 52 cars -- including the mayor's personal vehicle -- and several buildings overnight Thursday-Friday.

Security services fired teargas Saturday in two suburbs after coming under Molotov cocktail fire.

Calm was restored before first light, AFP reporters said.

There have been more than a dozen arrests over the violence, including in Garges-les-Gonesse, the Paris suburb where Aboubakar grew up.

Three men were given suspended four-month prison sentences on Friday for taking part in the violence after the shooting.

In a separate development, two off-duty officers, a husband and wife, were attacked Wednesday night in front of their three-year-old daughter in a northeastern suburb of Paris shortly after leaving a dinner party.

French security forces are frequently treated as targets and they struggle to combat violent drug-dealing gangs.

A police source said the attackers recognised the policewoman because she had recently stopped them for an ID check in the crime-ridden area of Aulnay-sous-Bois.

President Emmanuel Macron denounced the attack as an "appalling and cowardly act" and vowed the suspects would be "found and punished".

One of them has been arrested while the second remains on the run.

- 'Justice for Abou' -

In a bid to defuse tensions, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe visited Nantes on Thursday where he promised "the fullest transparency" about the circumstances of the young man's death.

On Thursday evening, around 1,000 people marched in Nantes calling for "justice for Abou" and demanding clarity about the circumstances of his death.

There have been fears that the unrest could spread.

In 2005, riots erupted across the country following the deaths of two black teenagers who were electrocuted in a Paris suburb while hiding from the police.

Anger over policing bubbled over again last year when a young black man in another Paris suburb suffered severe anal injuries caused by a truncheon during his arrest.

Dozens of vehicles were set ablaze in a fourth night of rioting in western France after a policeman shot dead a young black man

The nights of violence in the western city of Nantes have highlighted tensions in deprived urban areas where youths often complain of heavy-handed policing and brutality

Graffiti in the French city of Nantes says "Police kill"
 
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2018/07/06/minnesota-police-shooting-modern-day-lynching/

Victim’s Sister: Minnesota Police Shooting ‘Modern Day Lynching

(CBS) — Family and friends of Philando Castile, a black man who was shot several times and killed by police during a traffic stop in Minnesota, were united in grief and prayer outside Hennepin County Medical Center, where he died.

“It’s just like we’re animals. It’s basically modern-day lynching that we’re seeing going on, except we’re not getting hung by a tree anymore. We’re getting killed on camera,” said his sister, Alize Castile.

The 32-year-old victim was Valerie Castile’s only son.

“He did everything by the law and he died by the law,” she said.

Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, and her young daughter were in the car during the incident.

Reynolds captured the aftermath of the bloody shooting on video from the passenger seat, live streaming as her boyfriend was dying next to her after she said a police officer fired four shots at him.

The video shows an officer’s gun sticking through the window moments after shots were fired.

Philando Castile is still wearing his seat belt, his t-shirt still soaked in blood.
 
http://www.wdam.com/story/38590949/ms-law-enhances-penalties-for-crimes-against-emergency-personnel

MS law enhances penalties for crimes against emergency personnel

A new Mississippi law is enhancing the penalties of any offense against law enforcement officers, firefighters and EMT personnel.

It's called the Blue, Red and Med Lives Matter law, which states that any felony or misdemeanor against an officer, firefighter or EMT personnel for the sole purpose of their profession will face harsher punishment.

This means that the offense may be enhanced by punishment for the term of imprisonment and/or a fine twice that authorized by law for the offense committed.

Several people we spoke to who wished to not be on camera, said they fully support the law, while others who also wished to not be on camera have a few questions.

"I understand why they put it in effect for the respect because lately it's been getting out of hand," one person said. "But my thing is there are some people that abuse that uniform as well. So what do they have in effect for us that get abused by the ones that are wearing that uniform?"

The law states that emergency medical personnel, firefighters and officers are now classified as victims in these situations. This class includes crimes against people solely due to their race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, national origin and gender, where penalties are usually enhanced.
 
http://wuwm.com/post/milwaukee-aldermen-approve-stop-and-frisk-settlement#stream/0

Milwaukee Aldermen Approve Stop-And-Frisk Settlement

Milwaukee aldermen have approved a nearly $3.5 million settlement, related to the former police chief’s policy of routine traffic stops in high-crime areas. Edward Flynn set up the program in hopes that the practice would significantly reduce violent crime. But, the ACLU of Wisconsin filed a federal class action lawsuit last year. The organization claimed the policy amounted to thousands of illegal “stop and frisks” of African-American and Latino residents. The vote Tuesday followed a sometimes bitter debate.

The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of a half dozen people who claimed they were stopped once or multiple times since 2010. The settlement calls for the Milwaukee Police Department to document every stop in the future and regularly release the data. Officers would also receive training and supervision on racial profiling. The Common Council approved the settlement 12-2, with one alderman absent. Alderwoman Milele Coggs voted in favor of it – she says she hopes it closes a sad chapter in the city’s history.

“So that we never again are back at the same situation that we were at, where there is even a possibility that whoever is chief instituting practices and policies with the department that end up with us being in lawsuits where there is even the suggestion of racial profiling. That’s an end I would think we all want to get to, to prevent future lawsuits,” Coggs says.

Another person upset about practices, under former police chief Edward Flynn, was Ald. Russell Stamper. He gave suggestions in case more accusations of police misconduct surface in the future. For instance, Stamper says the department could cover its own insurance costs -- and foot the bill for settlements.

“Either you self-insure yourself police department or you remain the same and officers are held accountable and severely disciplined, or if you do misconduct, it’s coming out of your budget,” Stamper says.

Bob Donovan was one of two aldermen voting against the settlement. The other was Mark Borkowski. Donovan seemed appalled by the hefty price tag. Before the vote, he noted the $3.4 million is part of a long line of payouts the city has had to make for police misconduct claims.

“With this passage and I’m sure these items will pass Council, we will have arrived at approximately $23 million in police misconduct settlements since 2015. That’s an astronomical number,” Donovan says.

Donovan said he fears the impact the settlements could have on the police districts and neighborhoods. He says officers might not want to pursue suspects with the vigor they once did, out of fear their actions will result in a lawsuit.

“I’m worried that officers will just put the blinders on and drive by if they can get away with it,” Donovan says.

Donovan also took the city attorney’s office to task, for what he perceives as its willingness to settle lawsuits for high amounts. Meanwhile, Ald. Michael Murphy shared a more moderate view of the settlement. He voted in favor of the agreement, noting the proposed original cost was $6 million. He says the city was able to whittle down the amount in negotiations – to $3.4 million. Murphy says he believes former police chief Edward Flynn had good intentions when he implemented the policy.

“Part of his rationale was trying to get a large number of guns off the streets of Milwaukee and in fact per capita, we took more guns off the street than practically any city in the United States,” Murphy says.

Under terms of the agreement the Common Council approved Tuesday, a consulting firm would monitor the progress of future police practices. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett was expected to immediately sign off on the settlement.
 
http://abc7chicago.com/cpd-officer-...und-not-guilty-in-december-bar-fight/3758498/

Days after he was found not guilty on battery charges for a bar fight last December, Chicago Police Officer Robert Rialmo became involved in an altercation at a bar Friday, police

Days after he was found not guilty on battery charges for a bar fight last December, Chicago Police Officer Robert Rialmo became involved in an altercation at a bar Friday, police said.

Investigators said the scuffle happened Friday morning, just before closing time at Teaser's Pub located at 7123 W. Higgins Avenue in the city's Norwood Park neighborhood.

A CPD spokesperson confirmed that the 29-year-old officer was at the pub at around 3:40 a.m. when a verbal altercation between Rialmo and at least two other men turned physical 3inside the bar after someone spilled beer on the embattled officer.

Patrons told investigators that all the men including Rialmo were kicked out of the pub, but ended up being involved in another confrontation down the street outside a taco restaurant. Rialmo was not on duty.


Friday afternoon, authorities continued to investigate as they look at surveillance video from the security cameras of nearby businesses as well as try to locate possible cellphone video of the fight. A police spokesperson said Rialmo took a breathalyzer test and blew a zero.

"One gangster charged at Rialmo...then the other gangster started taking cell phone video of Rialmo," said Rialmo's attorney Joel Brodsky. "Officer Rialmo tried to stop the gangster from taking his picture, and then called 911. When other officers arrived as a result of Officer Rialmo's 911 call, the gang bangers came back shouting gang slogans and flashing gang signs at Rialmo and the officers, which was captured on the officers' body cameras. Officer Rialmo is considered the victim of an attack by street gang members."

Most recently, Rialmo was the subject of a civil lawsuit over his fatal shootings of 19-year-old Quintonio LeGrier and 55-year-old Bettie Jones on the city's West Side in December 2015. A jury found he was justified in his use of force.

Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson rejected the finding of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability or COPA that Rialmo was "not justified" in using deadly force. He remains on paid desk duty and will learn from the police board if he can keep his job.
 


Officers working on a small-town Florida police force were directed to arrest any black person with “somewhat of a record” and pin unrelated crimes on them, the Miami Herald reports. The goal of this clearly illegal and highly unethical practice was to achieve perfect crime stats, which the department frequently boasted about, even if they were fake.

It worked, for a time at least. In 2013 and 2014, the police in Biscayne Park, Florida, a quiet suburb of Miami, solved 29 of 30 burglary cases. It was a point of pride for former chief Raimundo Atesiano, and according to one officer who worked under him, he wanted to keep those stats by any means necessary
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/nyregion/eric-garner-police-federal-deadline.html

Police Dept. Gives Federal Investigators Ultimatum in Eric Garner Case

The New York Police Department, impatient at the slow pace of the federal government’s civil rights investigation into the death of Eric Garner in July 2014, told the Justice Department on Monday that it would soon start disciplinary proceedings against the officers involved in the killing in the absence of federal action.

The Police Department, acting one day before the fourth anniversary of Mr. Garner’s death on Staten Island, said it would no longer hold off on disciplinary proceedings if the Justice Department had not announced by Aug. 31 whether it will file criminal charges.

“Understandably, members of the public in general and the Garner family in particular have grown impatient with the fact that N.Y.P.D. has not proceeded with our disciplinary proceedings and they have difficulty comprehending a decision to defer to a federal criminal investigation that seems to have no end in sight,” Lawrence Byrne, the department’s deputy commissioner for legal matters, said in a letter to the Justice Department on Monday.

Mr. Byrne added that “given the extraordinary passage of time since the incident without a final decision” on the federal investigation, “any further delay in moving ahead with our own disciplinary proceedings can no longer be justified.”

The disciplinary proceedings would involve Officer Daniel Pantaleo, who was seen on a bystander’s video holding Mr. Garner’s neck as he begged for breath, as well as a sergeant, Kizzy Adonis, who was one of the first supervisors at the scene. Sergeant Adonis has already been administratively charged with failing to properly oversee her officers, according to a senior police official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. The disciplinary proceedings against her, however, have paused, pending the federal investigation.

A Staten Island grand jury declined to indict Officer Pantaleo on criminal charges.

Each anniversary of Mr. Garner’s death has brought anguish to his family. Critics have challenged the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio to explain how, after so long, the officer seen on video applying a chokehold to Mr. Garner, who was 43, still had not faced discipline.

With its letter on Monday, the department appeared interested in getting ahead of the inevitable questions police officials and Mr. de Blasio have faced each summer.

“No one is dragging their feet,” Mr. de Blasio said on July 17, 2016, in response to a question about the process, which, even then, seemed unnecessarily delayed. “Everything is being done meticulously because we want to make sure that what happens is fair to everyone involved.”

The mayor said then, as he has said frequently since, that the Police Department would move forward with its internal disciplinary process after the federal investigation had been completed. Now, the de Blasio administration, in its letter, said it would no longer wait.

The Justice Department said in a statement that the letter “does not have any bearing on the decision-making timeline” of prosecutors. The statement also said prosecutors informed Mr. Byrne “this spring” that the Police Department could move forward with disciplinary proceedings.

Phil Walzak, the Police Department’s top spokesman, disputed that account. “D.O.J. did not provide a green light this spring,” he wrote in an email.

The department filed internal charges against Sergeant Adonis in January 2016. Officials said at the time that they had to begin the process because of an 18-month statute of limitations under the state’s Civil Service Law.

The same time constraint did not apply to Officer Pantaleo because of an exception made in cases where there is an ongoing criminal investigation, officials said; the Police Department’s inquiry into Officer Pantaleo was completed more than two years ago.

If the Justice Department takes no action, an internal trial at the Police Department would begin, overseen by a deputy police commissioner. The Civilian Complaint Review Board, an outside oversight agency that looks into police wrongdoing, found last year that Officer Pantaleo used a prohibited chokehold and recommended departmental charges that could lead to suspension or dismissal. A lawyer from the complaint board would act as a prosecutor in the departmental trial, officials from the board and the Police Department said.

“When this police hearing goes forward, Daniel Pantaleo is not the only one on trial,” said the Rev. Al Sharpton, standing with Mr. Garner’s mother at a news conference in Harlem on Monday. “The chokehold policy of the N.Y.P.D. is on trial.”

Sergeant Adonis would be prosecuted by a police department lawyer. The complaint board does not have jurisdiction over the kind of managerial mistakes she is accused of committing.

If found guilty of misconduct at a departmental trial — a process that would likely stretch into next year — Officer Pantaleo and Sergeant Adonis could face a range of penalties, including mandatory retraining, lost vacation time to outright dismissal. The police commissioner, James P. O’Neill, has the final say over their fates.

Defense attorneys for both officers declined to comment. The Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association said in a statement that Officer Pantaleo “is entitled to due process and an impartial consideration of the facts” and would eventually be “vindicated.”

The city paid $5.9 million to settle a civil suit over Mr. Garner’s death in 2015.

Esaw Snipes, Mr. Garner’s widow, said she had been told of the Police Department’s decision to move ahead with the trial if the Justice Department does not act before Aug. 31. She said she hoped it would mean an end to what has been an “emotionally draining” experience that included the death last year of her daughter, Erica Garner, who had actively protested her father’s death.

“I’m kind of like skeptical about everything now,” Ms. Snipes, 50, said in an interview. “If something happens, then great. But I’ve kind of like given up hope. It’s been so long. It’s been four years.”
 
https://www.citizen-times.com/story...hts-groups-after-williams-shooting/765672002/

APD launched effort to gather intelligence on Black Lives Matter, other groups

ASHEVILLE - Two years ago, after the fatal police shooting of a local black man ignited a summer of racial tension, police launched an intelligence operation to monitor the efforts of two civil rights groups, a Citizen Times investigation has found.

Asheville Police Department Chief Tammy Hooper authorized the monitoring of Black Lives Matter and Showing Up for Racial Justice in response to what she said were threats to officers after the shooting of Jai "Jerry" Williams by a white police sergeant.

The groups' organizers said they are unaware of any threats made by their members to harm police. Their groups work to raise awareness about racism and get more equitable treatment for minorities, they said. .

City Council members appear to have been briefed on the operation sometime after March 2018, according to statements from the elected officials and police. APD revealed the operation to the Citizen Times in May after questioning.

Mayor Esther Manheimer said City Council isn't allowed by the city charter to get involved in day-to-day police operations and that it's APD's job to "devise legal strategies" to keep the community safe.

"It would be my expectation that the department utilize information gathering practices, typical of any police department, that keep them one step ahead of any potential danger to our community," Manheimer said Monday, when asked for her reaction to the operation.

Police officials, however, have declined to answer most of the Citizen Times' questions about the operation, including whether officers monitored the organizations openly or in an undercover fashion. They also have refused to detail the threats they received.

APD has not confirmed the monitoring has ended or said whether a full-blown criminal investigation was started as a result.

The Citizen Times gathered tips from an anonymous source with knowledge of the monitoring, public records and police statements over five months to piece together a picture of the operation.

The monitoring drew strong criticism from civil rights activists, like Black Lives Matter education coordinator Sharon Smith, who after learning about the operation from the Citizen Times said it made her believe APD's motives had nothing to do with public safety.

“That’s just an intimidation tactic, basically,” Smith said. “They are looking for something to hold on us. It’s inappropriate.”

But legal experts say it runs the risk of trampling civil rights and undermining public trust, especially at a time when Asheville, like the nation, is facing difficult questions over treatment of African-Americans by law enforcement. High-profile violent incidents ranging from the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, to the August beating of unarmed black pedestrian in Asheville, have amplified tensions.

"This is fundamental to free speech protections; the context matters," said Jonathan Jones, a former prosecutor who now directs the North Carolina Open Government Coalition, a nonprofit promoting public access to government activities with members including the Associated Press and the conservative John Locke Foundation.

"If groups monitored are made up predominantly of folks who don’t have violent intent, who are just trying to change society, it raises questions," Jones said.

The monitoring, according to police, also targeted “related individuals,” and at least two non-civil rights groups: the popular Facebook group Asheville Politicsand an activist vegan organization DxE or "Direct Action Everywhere."

Hooper and other city officials have declined interview requests about the operation, saying they would respond only to written questions.

“The purpose of written questions is to allow us to prepare complete answers without compromising confidential information that could put someone’s safety in jeopardy,” Hooper wrote to the Citizen Times.

Residents say they were targets
Black Lives Matter President Delores Venable and her mother, former council candidate and longtime activist Dee Williams, said they were told by an anonymous caller they were under police surveillance, along with the Rev. Amy Cantrell, a leading city social justice activist.

Venable and Williams made the statements at a March 7 Citizens/Police Advisory Committee meeting. The highly charged gathering followed the reporting of the August 2017 police beating of Johnnie Rush, who was accused of jaywalking and trespassing by cutting through the parking lot of a business closed for the night. The community outcry at the meeting included calls for Hooper's resignation.

Criminal charges were brought against then-officer Chris Hickman eight days after the Feb. 28 publication of body cam footage of the beating by the Citizen Times.

At the meeting, Venable confronted Hooper.

“Is it true or is it not that you and your officers had me, Amy Cantrell and Dee Williams under surveillance with your taxpayer money. Is that true or is it not?” she asked.

Hooper responded: “I have not had you under surveillance or your mom or any individual person.”

“Based on what we are hearing in the community, there seems to be confusion around information gathering (also called intelligence gathering) and direct criminal surveillance, i.e. following people, tracking movement etc.,” APD spokeswoman Christina Hallingse said in a May 9 email. “No individual was under surveillance as part of this effort.”

Black Lives Matter education coordinator Smith said she has regularly seen police near Venable’s home in Kenilworth, and that there "is constantly an APD car parked at the bottom of her street."

Heated summer in 2016
Police said they began their operation after the July 2, 2016, shooting of Jai "Jerry" Williams by Sgt. Tyler Radford.

Suspected of having fired a gun outside an apartment complex, police said Williams led Radford on a high-speed chase. Upon being stopped, Radford said Williams refused to put his hands up and instead picked up a gun. Radford shot him nine times.

Post-mortem tests showed Williams was intoxicated. A recent civil suit by Williams' family against APD disputes the police version of events.

In December 2016, District Attorney Todd Williams ruled the shooting justified.

Days after Williams' death, protestors gathered at the Buncombe County Courthouse. At a news conference, Williams' family was joined by John Barnett, founder of the Charlotte-based civil rights group True Healing Under God. He pointed to the high-profile deaths of Brown, Eric Garner and other African-American men in fatal police encounters.

Protests culminated with a July 21 unpermitted march through downtown, where police said participants pounded on cars and blocked streets. Demonstrators placed a Black Lives Matter banner on the police station, and held an overnight sit-in inside the station. Eight people were arrested, including Cantrell.

Police: Officers were at risk after Williams shooting
Hallingse said the threats on police came in July and August 2016 and were "observed on social media and in open meetings."

She refused provide further description of the threats, including what was said, who made them, who observed them or whom they targeted. She said revealing that, “could jeopardize the safety of community members and police officers."

Hallingse also cited state law, saying criminal investigations and criminal intelligence information are not public record. That nondisclosure, however, is optional, said N.C. Press Association attorney Amanda Martin.

Civil rights groups leaders said their missions didn't include violence.

“Nobody in Asheville Black Lives Matter is involved in criminal anything,” said Smith. “Nobody has issued any threats to police.”

Roach, who's group Showing Up for Racial Justice was created as a way for white people to fight racism, said the march and sit-in may have "freaked out," APD officials.

“There are definitely activists in the community who don’t like the police, but SURJ is not the type of group that would issue threats,” Roach said.
 
Officers attended meetings
Hooper authorized officers to monitor “publicly accessible information to assess whether or not criminal activity was being planned,” according to a statement from Hallingse. That approval required a “reasonable suspicion” the groups may have been planning or engaging in criminal activity, based on APD's intelligence and analysis policies.

Intelligence gathering is different from a criminal investigation. Launching an investigation requires a higher degree of certainty by police that crime is occurring because an investigation's purpose is to prevent or solve a crime.

Hallingse didn't answer whether electronic recording devices were used in the groups' monitoring. She described the meetings police attended starting July 2016 as open events.

She would not say whether officers wore uniforms or identified themselves as law enforcement, or whether officers worked undercover or tried to infiltrate the groups.

Group leaders said they didn’t see uniformed officers and that no attendees identified themselves as police.

Roach said Showing Up for Racial Justice meetings happened at Firestorm Books & Coffee in West Asheville and began with attendees introducing themselves. Some people may have come in late and not spoken, she said.

Black Lives Matter meetings were at a house converted into an office in the historically black Southside area, Smith said. While most attendees were African-American, there were “quite a few white people,” the education coordinator said.

“We knew who people were, so any officers would be instantly recognizable,” she said.

Attacks against police
Some say the Asheville department's actions were routine and occurred as attacks were being made against law enforcement nationally.

One was the 2014 ambush-style slaying of two New York police officers by Ismaaiyl Brinsley, who apparently posted threats on social media showing a desire to kill police after the deaths of Garner and Brown.

Two years later in Dallas, Micah Johnson gunned down five officers, telling police during a standoff he did it as revenge for recent shootings. The Dallas event happened July 7, 2016 — five days after Williams' shooting in Asheville.

“Every threat is taken seriously,” said Joseph Giacalone, a former commanding officer for NYPD homicide cold cases and now a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Joe Pollini, a former NYPD undercover officer who also teaches at John Jay, said police monitoring should be careful in crossing certain lines, such as infiltrating a group deeply or becoming “a sworn member.”

Police should also avoid keeping files with information unrelated to suspected crimes, something that raises civil liberties concerns.

"It can start to be a problem if you are keeping records on individuals," Pollini said.

But attending public rallies undercover, or even going to open meetings in a private space, wouldn’t violate common police standards, he said.

“If it’s a public meeting, it’s fine."

Civil rights and government spying
But legal experts say police should move cautiously when determining whether an intelligence operation is warranted.

The context of threats, the resources needed and the sticky history of police monitoring civil rights groups should all be considered, they say.

Jeff Welty, a public law professor with the UNC School of Government, said observation of civil rights groups brings up questions of free speech protections and can harken back to government spying in 1960s and 1970s on such organizations.

“That kind of raises the specter of a political motivation, which is antithetical to the idea that law enforcement is a politically neutral public servant," he said.

Also, without a solid reason, such actions could damage a police department's reputation and trust with the public it is paid to protect. That's "really serious," said Jones, the N.C. Open Government Coallition director.

Smith, with Black Lives Matter, said the monitoring was a "waste of time."

"It speaks to the racism inherent in policing. Because what we're talking about is undoing racism and undoing police violence."

Hallingse said the department doesn't conduct intelligence operations “based solely on ethnic background or race."

Monitoring Facebook, vegans
While Asheville Politics doesn't hold physical meetings, the popular left-leaning Facebook group has almost 7,500 members who engage in spirited, wonky and often tongue-in-cheek political discussions.

APD declined to say what it observed in monitoring the group, where it's not unusual to see posts from City Council members or candidates during election season.

Administrators include former council candidate Rich Lee and the elected Buncombe County register of deeds, Drew Reisinger.

The targeted vegan group DxE promotes the abolition

of meat of and stages disruptive protests at restaurants and stores selling animal products.

Local organizer Jeremy Sagaribay said he knew little about Williams' shooting and said members never issued any threats.

“We do not condone violence or threats of violence against anyone,” he said.

Like the other groups, Sagaribay said they never saw police at their meetings but said there were uniformed officers at their demonstrations.

What was the result of the operation?

Information gathered in an intelligence operation but not related to criminal activity is to be destroyed, Hallingse said. She would not say if any information from this operation was stored in criminal intelligence files.

She said intelligence operations are “very helpful” in catching and convicting criminals. They also can help police plan for demonstrations and rallies

Hallingse said police used information from social media and “publicly accessible areas” to identify and cite participants in the 2016 unpermitted march.

The information’s classification as a nonpublic record prevents those who were potentially monitored from knowing the outcome of the police operation.

Roach said the operation would have found no evidence against Showing Up for Racial Justice.

“We made our statements publicly through the media and our right to assemble,” she said. “If we were in fact infiltrated, we know that police would not find a threat to them because we had never been one."

Cointelpro at the local level...
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...-group-report-racial-bias-20180717-story.html

NYPD watchdog blames racial profiling by cops for nearly 90% of defendants being people of color, study says

A watchdog group blamed the “longstanding problem of stark racial bias in NYPD tactics” for the vast disparity in minorities prosecuted by the city.

The Police Reform Organizing Project says its members sat in on more than 5,000 criminal court cases since 2014, and found nearly nine out of 10 cases involved people of color. There were 4,645 minority defendants in the 5,162 cases observed at arraignment courts in all the boroughs except Staten Island, according to a report released Tuesday.

Most of those cases involved low-level charges like marijuana possession, driving with a suspended license and theft of services – and in nearly 90% of those cases, the suspects were released or made bail that day, “demonstrating that neither the judges nor the district attorneys consider the defendants a threat to public safety,” the report said.

“New York’s district attorneys aggressively prosecute cases against black and brown people for engaging in mainly innocent or innocuous activities,” the report added. “On a regular basis, our city’s courts devote their considerable resources to the administration of injustice, applying sanctions in hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where the charges involve, at worst, petty infractions and where the defendants are almost always people of color, some of whom live on the margins of society.”

Project director Robert Gangi, who ran for mayor in the city's Democratic primary last year, said progressive politicians like Mayor de Blasio haven’t followed through on their police reform promises.

“Every day that New York City’s political leaders sidestep this issue, our so-called criminal justice system continues its abusive and discriminatory practices,” said Gangi, who garnered just 3% of the vote against de Blasio.

The NYPD rebutted Gangi’s report, claiming that the department does not engage in racial profiling.

“The NYPD enforces the law fairly and equally, and works tirelessly every day to keep every resident and every neighborhood safe,” an NYPD spokeswoman said Tuesday. “The NYPD is also committed to building trust between police and the community, whether by dramatically reducing stop-and-frisk by more than 90%; by providing more than 8,000 officers with fair and impartial training; or by implementing a new neighborhood policing strategy that bring cops and community closer together through mutual respect and partnership. This commitment will only intensify moving forward – demonstrating that in New York City, we can drive crime to record low levels and strengthen the bond between police and residents.”
 


https://www.pressofatlanticcity.com...cle_8e20dc99-4fd4-5b88-97c5-e73602379532.html

People gather to remember man killed in Vineland police shooting

VINELAND — About 20 people gathered near the intersection of West Wood Street and North West Boulevard on Sunday night to protest the death of Rashaun Washington, who was fatally shot by police Saturday.

Washington, 37, of Bridgeton, was identified Sunday by Cumberland County Prosecutor Jennifer Webb-McRaea as the man police shot and killed.

By Sunday afternoon, a memorial with candles, crucifixes and blue and white balloons had been placed at the site where Washington was shot.

The people who gathered at the site Sunday evening protested peacefully, holding signs, praying and leading chants such as “enough is enough” and “justice for Reshaun.”

The protest was organized by Action Together New Jersey. Another is scheduled for 7 p.m. Thursday at the same location.

“This isn’t about attacking the police, this isn’t about politics, this is about a life that was lost when it shouldn’t have been,” said Josh Barreiro, a Vineland resident who helped organize the protest. “We’re here to make a statement that this needs to stop.”

At 11:22 a.m. Saturday, Vineland police responded to a home on West Wood Street for a report of a man “acting suspiciously” on the front porch, Webb-McRae said in a statement.

After several minutes, the man was fatally shot, the prosecutor said.

Authorities have not identified the officers involved and the investigation is being led by the Cumberland County Prosecutor’s Office, which is standard under state law.

Ryonna Maven, who was driving in the area with her mother at the time of the shooting, took video of the incident.

Maven’s video shows the man walking toward police, K9s lunging forward and barking, before three gunshots ring out. The man is next seen lying on the ground.

“There is no reason one man with a water bottle (in his hand) should be dead right now,” said Shevone Torres, of Mount Holly, who is an activist with the New Jersey chapter of Black Lives Matter. “I’m tired, I’m angry and I’m frustrated. This should not be happening here. And the fact is that we’re in these smaller towns where cops think that because they don’t get the media attention, they can do whatever the hell they want to us.”

Maven said Saturday that Washington had nothing in his hands. On Sunday, the protesters said he had a water bottle in his hands.

Authorities have not confirmed whether Washington was holding anything.

Regardless, protesters said Sunday night they feel there was no reason for police to shoot Washington.

No members of the family attended the protest. Organizers said all the family members live in Camden.

“I would think (the police) should be trained to dial back and de-escalate the situation, but that didn’t happen here,” said Stu Mark, a protester who came to Vineland from Mays Landing. “This is a black lives matter issue and it needs to be dealt with.”
 
Back
Top