Did they score on that drive?If you do that why not start back where Goff got facemasked and they get 1st and Goal from the 1 a couple mins earlier. With a chance to take lead instead of tie late?
Did they score on that drive?
Let's say for the sake of argument I'll agree with youThey got 3 instead of potentially 7. 4 point swing
Y’all would then be driving for a TD instead of Fg or TD to win
Let's say for the sake of argument I'll agree with you
Again, going game speed I can see how that call was missed.
My point is still going to be this call had two officials. One in the front of the play, one on the backside. They both missed an obvious push, nah, tackle on a receiver while the ball was in flight
That missed facemask ain't got shit on this play and nothing you say will make them comparable. Just stop fam
This is a strange hill you've chosen to stand onThe fact is both calls were missed on the field. Refs admitted they missed the call. The issue would be if you did that play over injunction the Rams would say hey you missed this call too. And it’s just as important, not as egregious but just as important on how the game ends. And looking back we can all admit that would be reversed as well with replay.
I’m not saying y’all call isn’t more egregious it is, but the replay the game thing wouldn’t just start where the Saints want it to start. If it did Rams would argue their point and it would have to start there.
This would never happen anyway because then teams would be calling for injunctions multiple times a year.
This is a strange hill you've chosen to stand on
Why not go back to a missed hold on an OL in the first quarter using your logic
Well obviously I know whatever power the commissioner has, he's not going to exercise just for this gameThat's what he's saying, you give the Saints a play back then you're opening a big can of worms where every missed penalty teams will be calling for a do over. Saints got hosed but that's the nature of the game sometimes
This is a strange hill you've chosen to stand on
Why not go back to a missed hold on an OL in the first quarter using your logic
Really nigga? LolWas last night more egregious or was the phantom PI call against the Hurricanes in the '03 Championship Game
Ain't no half ass boycotting niggaYeah but I woulda watched the Superbowl if the saints was in it.
That's still inside me..even if the NFL made it dormant
Ah well it's all moot now
Fuck the NFL
That rule has been there for years but they will never do it because it would fuck up the moneyYep
Still tight
Read something this morning that the NFL actually has language they are trying to change that, as it exists now, goodell could basically make both teams take the field again, put the time back on the clock, and replay the down.
They not gonna do that, but that's wild
Nigga I never boycotted I stopped watching two seasons before kaepernick happened from lack of interest lolAin't no half ass boycotting nigga
:wdf5:
Was last night more egregious or was the phantom PI call against the Hurricanes in the '03 Championship Game
If you do that why not start back where Goff got facemasked and they get 1st and Goal from the 1 a couple mins earlier. With a chance to take lead instead of tie late?
Dickerson and Sharpe explain exactly what happened.So your sating because they didn't score a td in the second half, they can't drive down the field one last time and try to score. Fuck it end of game no more tries. WHAT.......
If you do that why not start back where Goff got facemasked and they get 1st and Goal from the 1 a couple mins earlier. With a chance to take lead instead of tie late?