Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Lifetime’s “Surviving R. Kelly” Docuseries(aka The #MeToo Summer Jam Screen series) Trailer

konceptjones said:
California penal code 261.5 (a): "Unlawful sexual intercourse is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the perpetrator, if the person is a minor. For the purposes of this section, a “minor” is a person under the age of 18 years and an “adult” is a person who is at least 18 years of age."

Tyga is a dirty pedophile.
Click to expand...

Oh damn. Qhole world just forgot
 
konceptjones said:
California penal code 261.5 (a): "Unlawful sexual intercourse is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the perpetrator, if the person is a minor. For the purposes of this section, a “minor” is a person under the age of 18 years and an “adult” is a person who is at least 18 years of age."

Tyga is a dirty pedophile.
Click to expand...
Now what's the marriage law cause it says "is not the spouse, if the person is a minor." Isn't that saying your can have sex with someone underage if you're married?
 
FYI:
Looks like Tariq and gang may need to find another talking point on "whataboutism" concerning ole Harvey

 
FE68FE06-2570-4515-995C-FFD490A27D32.jpeg

So this is what I've been saying. When he married Aaliyah, and in the case of Elvis marrying someone underage, they had parental consent so it wasn't taboo.

R. Kelly wasn't out here marrying all of these underage girls with parental consent.
 
a.mann said:
From what I read they know it was Kelly in the vid, but wasn't about the girl in question or her age at the time

And if it was socially acceptable there wouldn't it be such widespread public outrage, that many are defending him from
Click to expand...
Naw one of the first legal arguments by the defense was how we know it’s him then the girl and her family declined to testify or even press charges and the uncle testified it wasn’t her.....fam there was nt much outrage then...this is the most I’ve seen niggas enraged or really tuned in this shit
 
5th Letter said:
Dammit leave Harvey Weinstein alone
Click to expand...

They only trying to bring him down, because he's trying to buy Pornhub
angry.gif
 
a.mann said:
okay, how this one:


The problem I have with this is why Weinstein gets the big Sundance treatment and R.Kelly regulated to basic cable??

See,this shit I be talking about
martin3.png
Click to expand...
Look at it like this when the focus gets shifted to Michael Jackson at least you can say “but but there’s a Harvey Weinstein documentary too”.
 
5th Letter said:
Look at it like this when the focus gets shifted to Michael Jackson at least you can say “but but there’s a Harvey Weinstein documentary too”.
Click to expand...

Mike's legacy is invincible at this point. Nothing no one can say or do can change that
And as stated before he had no business having sleepovers in bed with kids like he did.

And if anything inappropriate went on,he got his karma with the way he left this world

No need for a new doc. specially if its not presenting new concrete evidence of wrongdoing
 
a.mann said:
okay, how this one:


The problem I have with this is why Weinstein gets the big Sundance treatment and R.Kelly regulated to basic cable??

See,this shit I be talking about
martin3.png
Click to expand...

I believe the word you are looking for is relegated. THIW.
 
a.mann said:
Mike's legacy is invincible at this point. Nothing no one can say or do can change that
And as stated before he had no business having sleepovers in bed with kids like he did.

And if anything inappropriate went on,he got his karma with the way he left this world

No need for a new doc. specially if its not presenting new concrete evidence of wrongdoing
Click to expand...
A lot of irony in this post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top