Welcome To aBlackWeb

Less Babies Are Being Born: Good or Bad?

Goldie

Kobe With The Pivot
Site Owner
If forecasts hold up, 2064 will be the first year in modern history where the global death rate surpasses the birth rate.


The world needs more babies.

Falling fertility rates have long been a concern for economists worried that aging societies could diminish the labor force, further exacerbate inflation, upend the consumer culture upon which mature economies depend and overwhelm government programs meant to care for aging populations.

Those changes are now upon us. A new study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) says that declining birth rates will permanently alter the demographic makeup of the world’s largest economies over the next decade.

What’s happening: If forecasts hold up, 2064 will be the first year in modern history where the global death rate surpasses the birth rate.

But the world’s largest economies are already there: The total fertility rate among the OECD’s 38 member countries dropped to just 1.5 children per woman in 2022 from 3.3 children in 1960. That’s well below the “replacement level” of 2.1 children per woman needed to keep populations constant.

That means the supply of workers in many countries is quickly diminishing.

In the 1960s, there were six people of working age for every retired person, according to the World Economic Forum. Today, the ratio is closer to three-to-one. By 2035, it’s expected to be two-to-one.

Top executives at publicly traded US companies mentioned labor shortages nearly 7,000 times in earnings calls over the last decade, according to an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis last week.

“A reduction in the share of workers can lead to labor shortages, which may raise the bargaining power of employees and lift wages — all of which is ultimately inflationary,” Simona Paravani-Mellinghoff, managing director at BlackRock, wrote in an analysis last year.

And while net immigration has helped offset demographic problems facing rich countries in the past, the shrinking population is now a global phenomenon. “This is critical because it implies advanced economies may start to struggle to ‘import’ labour from such places either via migration or sourcing goods,” wrote Paravani-Mellinghoff.

By 2100, only six countries are expected to be having enough children to keep their populations stable: Africa’s Chad, Niger and Somalia, the Pacific islands of Samoa and Tonga, and Tajikistan, according to research published by the Lancet, a medical journal.

BlackRock’s expert advises her clients to invest in inflation-linked bonds, as well as inflation-hedging commodities like energy, industrial metals and agriculture and livestock.

What it means: CEOs and politicians are already preparing for the baby bust.

Elon Musk, father of 12 children, has remarked that falling birthrates will lead to “a civilization that ends not with a bang but a whimper, in adult diapers.”

While his words are incendiary, they’re not entirely wrong.

P&G and Kimberly-Clark, which together make up more than half of the US diaper market, have seen baby diaper sales decline over the past few years. But adult diapers sales, they say, are a bright spot in their portfolios.

Other companies are also pivoting toward an older demo.

Nestlé’s chief executive, Mark Schneider, recently said he’s shifted the company’s priorities from producing infant formula to serving the nutritional needs of people over the age of 50.

Overstretched governments: French President Emmanuel Macron in January announced a plan for “demographic rearmament” in his country through fertility testing and more parental leave. Former President Donald Trump also recently promised that, if elected, he would support “baby bonuses for a new baby boom” in the United States.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that the US birth rate in 2023 fell to a record low, reversing a small uptick seen during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is also predicting that deaths will outnumber births just over 15 years from now.

Those findings underpin the agency’s economic forecast and budget projections, said Molly Dahl, a senior advisor at the CBO.

"What you’re seeing is increased spending on programs like Medicare and Social Security as the baby boomers are aging into those programs. And then of course, fewer workers relative to the number of people who are receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits,” said Dahl.

Social Security payments still provide about 90% of income for more than a quarter of older adults in the United States, according to Social Security Agency surveys.

But without intervention, the Social Security trust fund will be depleted by the mid-2030s, meaning that only a portion of retirees’ expected benefits will be paid out.

The AI solution: Some business leaders and technologists see the boom in productivity through artificial intelligence as a potential solution.

“Here are the facts. We are not having enough children, and we have not been having enough children for long enough that there is a demographic crisis, former Google CEO and executive chairman Eric Schmidt said at the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council Summit in London last year.

"In aggregate, all the demographics say there’s going to be a shortage of humans for jobs. Literally too many jobs and not enough people for at least the next 30 years,” Schmidt said.

But, he said, artificial intelligence will ease those problems significantly. A recent report by Goldman Sachs predicted that generative AI could raise global GDP by as much as 7% over a 10-year period.

Still, some experts say it’s too soon to tell how AI will impact the global economy.

A recent study by analysts at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond concluded that artificial intelligence could increase labor productivity between 1.5% and 18% over the next decade. “This ranges from barely noticeable to substantial,” they said.

The long-term solution to declining fertility rates, said Stefano Scarpetta, director for employment, labour and social affairs at the OECD, is to promote more gender equality and fairer sharing of work and childrearing. That also means more paid parental leave and financial support.

In the meantime, he said “this is not just a temporary blip.” Companies and governments need to prepare now for what he calls a “low-fertility future.”

 
Sounds like a problem for people who own businesses that need cheap laborers. If people are only having one child instead of three, that's two less children on Welfare or in poverty or worse.

I'm sure we will figure out another way to keep the drama going on Earth.
 
White birth rates have been declining for some time now

That's why they've turned up white supremacist violence and rhetoric in the last 10, 12 years
 
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but it's interesting that this is an on coming issue and governments are banning abortion and trying to work towards making birth control illegal....
I'm pretty sure that's part of the reason they have basically opened the floodgates when it comes to immigration. Less babies will fuck the economy up, and they can't have that.
 
On topic, this is an issue but also its not.

If by 2064, the world is the same as it is now, then yes this would be an issue, cause we will have more people collecting social security than paying into it. Thats a US example, but itll be world wide. And social security is not the only thing, its just an example. All that to say, the human population would be using more than we produce at a rate that would he unsustainable.

But thats if shit is the same in 2064 as it is today.

The reality is no one can guess the advances we gonna have by 2064. AI and robotics will make production so much more efficient that even with less workers, we'll produce more than we use. And who knows what will be innovated on top of AI and Robotics by then.

So imo this is a not a real issue.
 
Back
Top