deadeye
Warrior
Ok, I know it's 4 hours long.......and, honestly, I'm only 15 minutes in myself.
Basically what they're discussing, besides the title of the vid.........is the fact that the South African Government has already "appropriated" land from white farmers.
Appropriated meaning they've either taken it........or they only paid them 10% of what it's worth.
One of the major problems is that of the 8,000 farms that have been appropriated..............4,000 of them are not being worked.
Meaning, the government owns them...........but no black farmers have stepped up to purchase or work those farms.
So, after a while.......if these farms aren't being properly maintained..........they're eventually going to be unworkable.
At least for quite some time depending on how long they remain vacant.
So, the debate pretty much centers around whether it's even practical in the long run to take the land from the white farmers without there being some kind of plan to have that farmland worked.
If what happened in Zimbabwe is any indication of things to come, it might be best to leave well enough alone.
At the same time, it's not right for white farmers to profit off of land that their ancestors stole from the original owners.
One of the commentators said that 8% of the population (white) controls 72% of the farmland.
Not quite sure what the solution is, but........for the time being........it might be more practical to simply raise the taxes on the white farmers.
High enough for the government to generate sufficient tax revenue.........but not high enough that it's no longer worth it for them to keep working the land.
Thoughts?