Welcome To aBlackWeb

Führer Trump’s Impeachment Inquiry Thread. Update: The Senate completes the coverup


WH Aides Were Immediately Worried About Ukraine Call, Moved To Put Transcript In Vault


As soon as President Trump hung up the phone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25, his aides jumped into motion to address concerns about the conversation, including taking steps to put notes on the call in a password-protected, highly-classified vault, CNN reported.

National security officials immediately began discussing whether Trump had gone too far with his request for Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, per CNN. Some aides also discussed whether to alert senior officials — namely Attorney General Bill Barr who was named multiple times in the phone call — who were not privy to the conversation.

At least one White House official who listened in on the call was “visibly shaken” after the conversation, describing the call as “frightening” and “crazy,” ABC News reported, citing the notes taken by the whistleblower who eventually filed a complaint based on the conversation with that White House official. This means that at least one person close to President Trump who was listening to the call was concerned about Trump’s rhetoric. The memo penned by the whistleblower was reportedly written a day after the infamous Zelensky call, according to ABC. That memo was handed over to the intelligence community’s inspector general, who later deemed the complaint “credible” and of “urgent concern.”

Within a week of the call, a top intelligence agency lawyer contacted John Eisenberg, the lead lawyer on the National Security Council, to discuss concerns about a Trump call with a foreign leader, according to CNN. Around the same time, the White House’s memo on the call was being finalized by National Security Council staff. Instead of following the typical procedure for a call of this sort, a National Security Council lawyer, acting on Eisenberg’s guidance, moved the call to the highly secure server in order to prevent more people from seeing it, CNN reported.

One person familiar with the matter told CNN that it was possible Eisenberg ordered the memo placed in the vault because it would need to be preserved for legal reasons.

These revelations are all independent of the concerns that were raised by the intelligence community whistleblower. According to CNN, White House lawyers believed the contents of complaint would not see sunlight outside the executive branch.
 

White House Launches Full Frontal Assault On Impeachment Process

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent a letter Tuesday to House Democratic leaders that outright rejected Congress’ impeachment inquiry and sought to delegitimize the entire effort.



“President Trump and his Administration reject your baseless, unconstitutional efforts to overturn the democratic process. Your unprecedented actions have left the President with no choice. In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constitution, the Executive Branch, and all future occupants of the Office of the Presidency, President Trump and his Administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances,” Cipollone wrote in the letter addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Intel Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA), House Foreign Affairs Chair Eliot Engel (D-NY) and House Oversight Chair Elijah Cummings (D-MD).

The screed accuses Democrats of violating the “Constitution, the rule of law and every past precedent.” It’s clear from the letter that the White House believes taking an aggressive posture toward a co-equal branch of government is advantageous against the widening probe. Cipollone goes so far as to accuse Democrats of seeking to overturn the 2016 election results.

The White House’s letter was apparently in the works since last week, when the AP reported that the White House had planned to formally tell Pelosi that it will not cooperate with the House’s impeachment probe. It was unclear at the time how harsh a stance the White House Counsel’s Office would take. But the White House cranked its outrage up to 11 on Tuesday.

“Never before in our history has the House of Representatives-under the control of either political party-taken the American people down the dangerous path you seem determined to pursue,” Cipollone wrote.

In the letter, Cipollone added that the Democrats “have designed and implemented your inquiry in a maimer that violates fundamental fairness and constitutionally mandated due process” by “denying the President the right to cross-examine witnesses, to call witnesses, to receive transcripts of testimony, to have access to evidence, to have counsel present, and many other basic rights guaranteed to all Americans.”

The White House also argued that the impeachment probe is illegitimate because it was not undertaken with a full vote of the House.

A senior administration official confirmed Tuesday after that a “full halt” was being placed on any cooperation with the House’s inquiry, including its requests that members of the administration sit for interviews or its subpoena of documents.

“The administration’s policy, under the current circumstances at least, as these rules are currently framed, [is] that the administration will have a full halt because this is not a valid procedure for going forward on impeachment inquiry,” the official said.

The administration official, however, was cagey when asked what the House could do to secure the White House’s cooperation. The official refused to commit that the White House would cooperate if there was a floor vote in the House approving the inquiry or even if the House met all the other procedural demands laid out in the letter.

“I am not going to try to provide particular red lines or things like that,” the official said. “The letter, I think, speaks for itself about flaws — we’d have to see what the house wants to do try to remedy them.”

“I don’t want to speculate we will take it as the situation develops and day by day as things change, be able to reevaluate,” the official added.

The White House reiterated its defense of Trump’s now-infamous July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky being a “perfect” conversation, despite the fact that the White House’s own “memorandum” showed Trump pressuring Ukraine to dig up bogus allegations on the Bidens.

“The record clearly established that the call was completely appropriate and that there is no basis for your inquiry,” Cipollone wrote.

The White House’s letter comes on the heels of another missive from House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who last week called on Pelosi to suspend the impeachment probe — within an hour of Trump calling on the Chinese government to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
 
im not following this shit anymore until hear about folks getting arrested for failing to comply with the court. if that doesnt take place, no impeachment
 
Trump keeps using his shovel to dig himself deeper into the hole. However Trump has nine lives. He's most likely going to survive impeachment and unfortunately win in 2020.
 
Dems are looking real weak.

They should have it where anytime a Dem is on TV the need to say how the WH is violating the constitution.
 

Graham Intends To Rally Senate GOP To Formally Condemn Impeachment Effort


Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) intends to rally his Republican colleagues in the Senate to sign a letter officially declaring the phone call between President Trump and the president of Ukraine a non-impeachable offense.

During an interview with “Fox and Friends” on Wednesday morning, Graham laid out his intentions for inviting Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani before the Senate Judiciary Committee, claiming he believes Giuliani has a “story to tell” and that he wants to “shed light on all things Ukraine.” Graham then announced that he plans to orchestrate a formal condemnation of the House’s impeachment inquiry.

“I’m going to ask my colleagues in the Senate, Republicans, to sign a letter to Nancy Pelosi saying we do not believe the transcript of the phone call between the president and the Ukraine is an impeachable offense,” he said. “They are about to destroy the nation for no good reason. I’ve read the transcript. I do not see anything wrong there and I want Nancy Pelosi to know that Republican senators are not going to impeach this president based on this transcript, so she can stop now before she destroys this country.”

Graham announced on Twitter Tuesday that he was inviting Giuliani to come testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his “disturbing allegations” — which are confirmed fabricated — surrounding the firing of a former prosecutor in Ukraine and former Vice President Joe Biden. The invitation is believed to be a veiled attempt to scramble the Ukraine scandal at the center of the House’s impeachment inquiry and provide a counter-narrative for Trump.

Giuliani’s fake allegations are the substance of a pressure campaign initiated by Trump, members of his administration and Giuliani in order to manipulate the new Ukrainian president into investigating Biden, believed to be one of his top political rivals in 2020.

 

Pelosi Reacts To WH Letter: Efforts To Hide Truth ‘Further Evidence Of Obstruction’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reacted to a Tuesday letter from White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, saying that further efforts to hide President Donald Trump’s “abuse of power” would be considered “further evidence of obstruction.”




“This letter is manifestly wrong, and is simply another unlawful attempt to hide the facts of the Trump Administration’s brazen efforts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 elections,” Pelosi wrote. “Despite the White House’s stonewalling, we see a growing body of evidence that shows that President Trump abused his office and violated his oath to ‘protect, preserve and defend the Constitution.’”

Cippollone’s letter was a brazen rejection of the House’s oversight powers, trying to paint the probe as illegitimate.

A senior administration official confirmed that a “full halt” was being declared on cooperation with the House committees, including subpoenas and testimony.

Read Pelosi’s full letter here:

For a while, the President has tried to normalize lawlessness. Now, he is trying to make lawlessness a virtue. The American people have already heard the President’s own words – ‘do us a favor, though.’ The President’s actions threaten our national security, violate our Constitution and undermine the integrity of our elections. The White House letter is only the latest attempt to cover up his betrayal of our democracy, and to insist that the President is above the law.

“This letter is manifestly wrong, and is simply another unlawful attempt to hide the facts of the Trump Administration’s brazen efforts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 elections. Despite the White House’s stonewalling, we see a growing body of evidence that shows that President Trump abused his office and violated his oath to ‘protect, preserve and defend the Constitution.’

“The White House should be warned that continued efforts to hide the truth of the President’s abuse of power from the American people will be regarded as further evidence of obstruction.

“Mr. President, you are not above the law. You will be held accountable.”
 

Trump Complains About The Intel Inspector General He Himself Appointed

President Donald Trump on Wednesday blamed his own intelligence community inspector general on Wednesday for the House impeachment inquiry into Trump’s Ukraine dealings.

The President retweeted his son Donald Trump Jr.’s link to an Axios story, which reported that ICIG Michael Atkinson had told lawmakers the whistleblower behind the explosive complaint about Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president had “some type of professional relationship” with a 2020 Democratic candidate.

“Why doesn’t the ICIG do something about this Scam?” Trump tweeted. “He should have never let it start, a Dem Hoax!”

According to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel written opinion about the complaint, Atkinson had noted in his review that he had found “some indicia of an arguable political bias” from the whistleblower “in favor of a rival political candidate” but still found the complaint to be credible.

Additionally, Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire told Congress that he believed both Atkinson and the whistleblower “acted in good faith.”

 
Back
Top