Welcome To aBlackWeb

East Pittsburgh cop shoots & kills unarmed Blk 17yo.Update:Cop charged w/ criminal homicide…



https://triblive.com/local/regional...nty-gas-station-over-controversial-billboard/

Sunoco cuts ties with Armstrong County gas station over ‘offensive’ billboard


Sunoco said Wednesday it is halting fuel deliveries to an Armstrong County gas station because its owner posted controversial messages to a digital billboard about a quarter-mile away.

The fuel giant also started removing Sunoco signage and trademarks from the Worthington station, according to company officials.

The digital billboard along Route 422, owned by John Placek, displayed messages in recent weeks that Sunoco deemed offensive and racist.

“At Sunoco, we believe racism and bias in any form are simply unacceptable. Those representing the independently owned Sunoco-branded sites are expected to uphold our values on this topic. These offensive billboards are unacceptable and do not represent our values and beliefs in any way,” Sunoco spokeswoman Alyson Gomez said in a statement to the Tribune-Review. “I can confirm that we have terminated our business relationship with this site.”

John Placek did not return messages Wednesday. His twin brother, Richard, told the Trib on Wednesday evening that John Placek owns the gas station.

“It’s sad that Sunoco can’t stand behind John,” his brother said. “He’s a good man. But he’s a fighter. You can’t keep him down; he’ll do business with someone else.”

One message on the billboard began appearing after former East Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Rosfeld, who is white, was found not guilty of homicide last week after fatally shooting black teenager Antwon Rose during a June 19 traffic stop. The billboard displayed the word “Policeman” above a photo of Rosfeld and “Criminal” above Rose’s photo, along with the message, “Legal System Works, Justice Served, Get over it,” according to photos captured by Trib news partner WPXI-TV.

Another post on the billboard, which rotates through several messages, contained a racial slur.

Sunoco officials said they fielded complaints about the billboard on Twitter and responded to individual complaints and photos of it throughout the week.

John Placek told WPXI “he realizes he pushed the envelope” with the recent posts.

He said that he was trying to “highlight the dialogue of race issues,” WPXI reported.

The digital billboard was not operating Wednesday morning.

Two small, hand-made signs made out of white poster board and colored with marker were placed nearby and read, “Love not hate.”

A report filed Sunday with state police in Kittanning said wires to the sign had been cut, causing half of the sign to go dark.

Worthington Council President George Kerr said the borough has no control over the sign but has been fielding complaints about it.

The sign is privately owned on land leased from the Worthington West Franklin Volunteer Fire Department, according to Kerr.

The fire department did not return messages.

“He’s said some things on (the billboard) before that had people a little upset,” Kerr said. “This is by far the worst. Just everything in general about it.”

State Rep. Jeff Pyle, R-Ford City, has also gotten complaints. In a statement released Tuesday, he called the billboard’s messages “distasteful and divisive.”

“I want you to know that I completely disapprove of this hurtful hate speech,” Pyle said, adding his office is working with local officials on the issue.

The owners of a Subway sandwich shop that shares a building with the Sunoco put up a billboard of their own to make sure customers knew they were not connected.

“Subway not affiliated with Sunoco or its owner,” the sign reads.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ely-leads-convictions/?utm_term=.96a0130da246

When police kill unarmed black males, what seems obvious on video rarely leads to convictions

The arc of justice for Antwon Rose II has traveled along a familiar modern path: Police kill an unarmed black male, video emerges and protests erupt, along with calls for the conviction of officers involved.

And then, often, the opposite happens. Most fatal shootings by police result in no charges, and convictions are even less common.

But shootings of unarmed black males captured with ubiquitous smartphone or police body cameras have crystallized anger in communities rocked by killings, and several similar incidents have created expectations among some that video and social outrage should be enough to put officers in prison.

Those hopes dim when officers lean on the inherent danger of their work and invoke laws that allow broad authority for violence, leaving calls for justice and video outpaced by a legal system that critics say still favors the police.

Rose, 17, was shot three times after fleeing a car involved in a June shooting in East Pittsburgh. The officer, Michael Rosfeld, was charged with criminal homicide days later after he told conflicting stories about seeing Rose with a weapon, even though Rose was unarmed.

Searing bystander video and public outcry led to charges and the Rose family’s “guarded optimism” that Rosfeld would be convicted.

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted the case, came out forcefully in the days after the killing to suggest the high bar for a murder conviction could be met. “I find that Rosfeld’s actions were intentional,” District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala said in June. “He was not acting to prevent death or serious bodily injury.”

But Rosfeld was acquitted of charges last week, prompting more protests.

“Jurors see with their own eyes a fleeing kid, who is unarmed, and they know it is wrong. But the law is prohibitive. You can only do so much,” S. Lee Merritt, the attorney for Rose’s estate, told The Washington Post.

“State attorneys work with law enforcement and have the unusual task of prosecuting a police officer responsible,” he added. “It becomes a very awkward dance.”

The outcome was nearly symmetrical with that in the cases of Stephon Clark, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice and others whose killings were captured on video after they were confronted by police while unarmed.

No charges were filed against two officers who killed Clark in March 2018 after mistaking his white iPhone for a gun in a killing that upended Sacramento. An officer shouted “gun!” and, with his partner, fired 20 rounds at Clark in his grandmother’s backyard after they suspected he was breaking into nearby cars.

He was struck eight times, his family’s autopsy concluded.

The officers involved in killing Garner and Rice also did not face charges.

In Rosfeld’s case, Pennsylvania law allows officers to use force to prevent serious injury to themselves or others, or if they believe it will prevent a suspect’s escape from arrest in the event they are likely to commit violence.

The prosecution’s arguments against Rosfeld rested on his decision to shoot and kill Rose, but prosecutors did not provide an expert witness focused on police use of force for the trial, said Mike Manko, a spokesman for the district attorney’s office.

Prosecutors were otherwise “confident” that video evidence, “common sense” and other facts would overcome Rosfeld’s justification for using force, which can be confusing for a jury to wade through, Manko said.

Merritt, who was not involved in the criminal case, said prosecutors appeared to pull punches. Prosecutors did not fully press Rosfeld on the inconsistencies of his statements to investigators, he said.

Charging documents show Rosfeld told investigators he thought Rose pointed a gun at him but later said he did not see a gun and again altered his statement. Prosecutors pointed out Rosfeld’s inconsistencies during cross examination, Manko said.

In less than four hours, jurors found Rosfeld not guilty of first-degree murder, third-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter. “The verdict was too fast,” said Carolyn Morrison, Rose’s aunt, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. “It was all too fast."

Rosfeld’s attorney, Patrick Thomassey, defended the verdict. “This was an absolutely justified shooting,” he told The Post.

If Rosfeld didn’t shoot Rose and he went on to commit a crime, Thomassey said, “then people would be clamoring and asking why he didn’t shoot.”

Activists and East Pittsburgh community members were “expecting a rare win,” Merritt said.

Merritt is pursuing a path that other families and attorneys have used after officers did not receive prison time. He filed a federal civil suit against East Pittsburgh and Rosfeld, challenging the constitutionality of the state’s use of force laws, he said.

Videos of police killings have been key to some incidents. They rally communities and pressure law enforcement to release details that line up with the evidence. “If you have video, it does establish a core fact to some degree,” David A. Harris, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh, told The Post in 2015.

They have sometimes helped secure convictions against police who killed black males on video.

Former Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke was sentenced to six years in prison in January for the 2014 killing of Laquan McDonald, a 17-year-old suspect with a knife. Michael Slager, a former North Charleston, S.C., officer who killed Walter Scott in 2015, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in a federal case.

And yet, experts have long cautioned that video footage from shootings, while grisly, may not be decisive because it may be incomplete or cannot account for what an officer says they felt in the moment. Police shootings can be deemed legally justified based on whether jurors believe an officer was afraid for their life or the lives of others.

In that sense, video evidence competes with what an officer said they perceived.

For instance, an officer shot and killed Philando Castile during a traffic stop after Castile reached for his ID and told the officer he had a firearm in the car. The 2016 incident in Minnesota was captured in a live Facebook broadcast by Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds.

Jeronimo Yanez, who said he feared for his life, was found not guilty of manslaughter and two counts of endangering Reynolds and her 4-year-old daughter. He was dismissed from the police force.

Some point to the limited role video seem to have in securing convictions.

Concern over police killings and calls for change in black communities predate smartphones, but it was easier for others to avoid the issue then, said Phillip Atiba Goff, president of Center for Policing Equity, a nonprofit that promotes police transparency and accountability.

“What cameras did was make the moment inescapable,” Goff said. “People saw the black community. Then we watched them turn away.”
 
It feel great to know my folks ain't about to take no chump change settlement or hush money for my life.
 
And then the cops would simply not police

As opposed to "policing" and killing unarmed black folks for no reason?

If they don't do the job they are being paid to do then tell them to kick rocks and find folks that are willing to do the job right
 
As opposed to "policing" and killing unarmed black folks for no reason?

If they don't do the job they are being paid to do then tell them to kick rocks and find folks that are willing to do the job right
Yes my friend good luck responding to dangerous 911 calls and patrolling dangerous neighborhoods while worrying about your pension can be grabbed away from you at any moment if the masses gets emotional to how you acted.
Lol I would tell them straight up I’m only patrolling white neighborhoods and will not come as back up to any area that has high crime
 
Yes my friend good luck responding to dangerous 911 calls and patrolling dangerous neighborhoods while worrying about your pension can be grabbed away from you at any moment if the masses gets emotional to how you acted.
Lol I would tell them straight up I’m only patrolling white neighborhoods and will not come as back up to any area that has high crime

That's bullshit tho cuz if you're doing your job correctly and not OVERreacting at the sight of a black person making the slightest of movements you won't have to worry about your pension being snatched away. Look at all the ARMED white terrorists they bring in unscathed.

If they treated all folks equally... and didnt just shoot immediately when it comes to potential black suspect.. they're pension would be straight. They would also hold each other accountable knowing that they won't just get a slap on the wrist and the taxpayers will foot the bill for their fuck up
 
That's bullshit tho cuz if you're doing your job correctly and not OVERreacting at the sight of a black person making the slightest of movements you won't have to worry about your pension being snatched away. Look at all the ARMED white terrorists they bring in unscathed.

If they treated all folks equally... and didnt just shoot immediately when it comes to potential black suspect.. they're pension would be straight. They would also hold each other accountable knowing that they won't just get a slap on the wrist and the taxpayers will foot the bill for their fuck up
In this situation the cop was in the right. When you are stopped by a cop you stay in the car. By fleeing the cop does not know if you have weapon. By fleeing you can easily put innocent bystanders into this situation. If he was a criminal and grabbed a hostage these cops would have been the dumbest faggots on earth. Let me see if I can find the article I believe of uk cops that wanted to subdue a man with a knife which almost led to a civilian being stabbed. As a black man I would have done the same thing if I’m already responding to a shooting. And If I was responding to those white armed terrorists and they tried running or kept a gun in their hand I’ll gladly put a bullet in their back too.
 
Yes my friend good luck responding to dangerous 911 calls and patrolling dangerous neighborhoods while worrying about your pension can be grabbed away from you at any moment if the masses gets emotional to how you acted.
Lol I would tell them straight up I’m only patrolling white neighborhoods and will not come as back up to any area that has high crime
@Goldie @Chicity
@AP21
a white supremacist troll has infiltrated. He's been on some maga shit all day. He was caping for Amber Guyger earlier in the black Christian thread. There should be ZERO tolerance for this type of "matt" poster
 
In this situation the cop was in the right. When you are stopped by a cop you stay in the car. By fleeing the cop does not know if you have weapon. By fleeing you can easily put innocent bystanders into this situation. If he was a criminal and grabbed a hostage these cops would have been the dumbest faggots on earth. Let me see if I can find the article I believe of uk cops that wanted to subdue a man with a knife which almost led to a civilian being stabbed. As a black man I would have done the same thing if I’m already responding to a shooting. And If I was responding to those white armed terrorists and they tried running or kept a gun in their hand I’ll gladly put a bullet in their back too.

This is some bullshit man... these kids were not a threat... they were RUNNING AWAY.

Plenty of white suspects have ran away and not been shot in the back. Plenty of white suspects have advanced toward cops in a threatening manner and not been shot. Dont excuse this bullshit and say the cops were in the right. Shooting someone in the back is some cowardly shit
 
Back
Top