SeaSnake
OG
Nah I'll go with broke
This why nobody likes up north niggas
Nah I'll go with broke
You really think it's possible for him to earn $100 mill off the one song in the next century? lmao take yo meds grandpaActually $20 Mil is right.
The term of copyright for a particular work depends on several factors, including whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. As a general rule, for works created after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years.
https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-duration.html
Let's say Travis Scott lives for another 30 years. The copyright is good for that 30 years he's alive + another 70 years = 100 years.
How much money will that Travis Scott song generate over the next 100 years? And DJ Paul thinks the song was inspired by his original song!?!?
It's entirely possible that the Travis Scott song will generate $100 Million over the next 100 years. DJ Paul asking for $20 Mil is the right amount imo.
You really think it's possible for him to earn $100 mill off the one song in the next century? lmao take yo meds grandpa
Taking inflation into account 100yrs ago $40k would be roughly equal to a Mil todayI think it's possible that the original Tear Da Club Up could generate $100 Mil in the next 100 years. That's one of 3-6's most popular songs. Also, considering inflation, $100 Million will be like $100 Thousand a century from now.
You're greatly over estimating how much songs makeI think it's possible that the original Tear Da Club Up could generate $100 Mil in the next 100 years. That's one of 3-6's most popular songs. Also, considering inflation, $100 Million will be like $100 Thousand a century from now.
I was watching basketball today and they were playing It Takes Two by Rob Base & DJ EZ Rock during a timeout. That song could generate $100 Million in the next century.
You're greatly over estimating how much songs make
Well here's a song by Scott Joplin that he, "recorded" in 1890, approximately 130 years ago (He played the song and it was recorded onto sheet music that could be read by a player piano). When you take inflation into account, the value of the copyright and Publishing rights to this song could be astronomical.
Well here's a song by Scott Joplin that he, "recorded" in 1890, approximately 130 years ago (He played the song and it was recorded onto sheet music that could be read by a player piano). When you take inflation into account, the value of the copyright and Publishing rights to this song could be astronomical.
Nope. especially since your argument seems to be majorly based off of inflationWell here's a song by Scott Joplin that he, "recorded" in 1890, approximately 130 years ago (He played the song and it was recorded onto sheet music that could be read by a player piano). When you take inflation into account, the value of the copyright and Publishing rights to this song could be astronomical.