2025 NBA Finals: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Indiana Pacers (THUNDER WINS 1st NBA TITLE)

Added to Calendar: 06-05-25, 06-08-25, 06-11-25, 06-13-25, 06-16-25, 06-19-25, 06-22-25

Who wins?

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
Al G. Rhythm said:
Lol he doesn’t even need to win it to get in

Homie has 2 rings
2x all nba
3x all star

It’s enough imo

Best player from Cameroon ever

A true success story

What he would talk about during his speech? Idk lol
Click to expand...
I agree.

He's a HOFer even without the second ring cause he's gonna be in two finals, taking a 68 win team all the way to game 7 even if they lose.

He's gonna pick up a few more all stars and maybe another all NBA or two.

Already was a big time contributr to one ring.

I was only asking cause some folks are mad defensive over the HOF.
 
Al G. Rhythm said:
Best player from Cameroon ever
Click to expand...
Untitled.png
 
Al G. Rhythm said:
Hot take

I’ve never cared about finals MVP

I don’t even know how to weigh it as far as accomplishments

It almost always goes to the best player on the winning team

So it’s really between 2 guys on the winning team usually

Eh
Click to expand...
I'm asking cause imo Siakim deserves it, but it might go to the more popular player in Hali.

Hali's game winner is a big factor that could swing it over to him and I wouldn't argue it. But Hali also has had some duds.

Siakim has been consistent for the most part.

I like to see chaos, so I can see me enjoying Hali winning even though Siakim is more deserving. I can also enjoy see me enjoying Hali going to pick up the trophy and then hearing they called Siakims name. Lmaooo. Either way I get a laugh and I'm good.
 
AZTG said:
I'm asking cause imo Siakim deserves it, but it might go to the more popular player in Hali.

Hali's game winner is a big factor that could swing it over to him and I wouldn't argue it. But Hali also has had some duds.

Siakim has been consistent for the most part.

I like to see chaos, so I can see me enjoying Hali winning even though Siakim is more deserving. I can also enjoy see me enjoying Hali going to pick up the trophy and then hearing they called Siakims name. Lmaooo. Either way I get a laugh and I'm good.
Click to expand...
Lol this is a lot of attention for something you will care about for 30 secs

Don’t tell me the media machine got you caring who wins MVP over the other player

You compromised
 
AZTG said:
I agree.

He's a HOFer even without the second ring cause he's gonna be in two finals, taking a 68 win team all the way to game 7 even if they lose.

He's gonna pick up a few more all stars and maybe another all NBA or two.

Already was a big time contributr to one ring.

I was only asking cause some folks are mad defensive over the HOF.
Click to expand...
Nah I wouldn’t put him in the hall if he doesn’t win right now but you would put him in but laughed at Igoudala lol
 
A nigga like Nesmith gonna have like 40 while making 10 3’s in game 7 and throw a monkey wrench in all this FMVP talk
 
Al G. Rhythm said:
Lol this is a lot of attention for something you will care about for 30 secs

Don’t tell me the media machine got you caring who wins MVP over the other player

You compromised
Click to expand...
Let me know what your agenda is with this though.

FMVP does matter. Best player in the championship series isn't meaningless.

Tell me what your agenda is and I'll see if I'm with it.
 
AZTG said:
Let me know what your agenda is with this though.

FMVP does matter. Best player in the championship series isn't meaningless.

Tell me what your agenda is and I'll see if I'm with it.
Click to expand...
Lol I literally have no agenda

I just don’t care about FMVP

Imagine the Knicks win against the Thunder in a sweep hypothetically and Jalen Brunson wins FMVP

Who was his competition for the award? Towns?

Ooooh
 
The narrative is bogus as hell though

Niggas will penalize a player like Steph for only having 1 FMVP when he was definitively the best player on that team during their first run but since the narrative was that Iggy "slowed down" Bron he was awarded.

And then penalize Tatum as if JB is better because JB won the award over him.

And then penalize Kobe for only having 2 because he played next to Shaq. When in all fairness, Shaq would've been the best player on any team he played for
If you weren't feeding Shaq as the #1 option you were dumb af

I personally don't think it's that important because it doesn't take in the totality of the playoffs
 
What are we doing man? So now we want to discount FMVP?

I think you can always look back and point out when dumb selections were made. But we gonna say FMVP isn't important at all?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top