Welcome To aBlackWeb

2023 NBA Play-In Tournament Thread

I think when you average 32, 5, and 5 on histoeic efficiency and get your team to outperform expectations drastically, being a star is not up for debate
Lmao.

He shot 51%. That’s not historic. Of course if you wanna add in FTs % and shit.

Also, only 5 teams was worse than them in the west and Houston and SA was expected to be trash. So out perform expectations don’t really apply

Okay. So BI is a star I guess.

Only players put up better splits was KD and Curry.

Winning goes into being a star to me
 
Lmao.

He shot 51%. That’s not historic. Of course if you wanna add in FTs % and shit.

Also, only 5 was worse than them in the west and Houston and SA was expected to be trash. So out perform expectations don’t really apply

Okay. So BI is a star I guess.

Only players put up better splits was KD and Curry.

Winning goes into being a star to me
32 points on 51% for a guard is super historic. Jordan is the only other guard that comes to mind that did that.

And folks looked at OKC after Chet got injured and said their talent level would have them around 28 wins.

That was because no one saw Shai taking the leap that he did.

They ended up winning 12 more games than Vegas had them winning. Thats super out performing expectations.

He a star imo and the type of star thats not debateable.

Ingram imo is a star too. Buy his star is debateable, Shai's is not.
 
Back
Top