Freeman
Ethical crashout 🧊🥶🦉🇨🇦🇬🇾 FREEZE THE WORLD
Get back to high value posting. This can't be all you're interested in talking about on here man. Respectfully.U still cool w me fam
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get back to high value posting. This can't be all you're interested in talking about on here man. Respectfully.U still cool w me fam
I'm not nearly as interested in this as I used to be bc we've all made our points and no ones mind is changing. It's redundant at this point, and that's fine.Get back to high value posting. This can't be all you're interested in talking about on here man. Respectfully.
Eh, I called your take dumb so I’ll overlook your condescension. Back to brass tacks.Dems and Republicans are the same
The examples are equivalents
This is hard for u huh
Just matching energyEh, I called your take dumb so I’ll overlook your condescension. Back to brass tacks.
I'll take this as an admission that u mis characterized my point. Disagree with your analogy bc a prominent influencer who actively helped "hitler 2.0" "fascism" "the end of democracy" into office trumps everything else.Let’s go with equivalency instead of the same. You can use whatever basis to claim equivalency, but your basis is basically republicans honored a racist and democrats honored a racist.
For me, the magnitude of the actions of those honored and the context used for their honoring matter.
So based on your premise, sure, equivalency. But that’s like saying a grenade and a missile are equivalent because they’re bombs.
Didn’t mischaracterize intentionally, just interpreted using what I thought was a fair premise.Just matching energy
I'll take this as an admission that u mis characterized my point. Disagree with your analogy bc a prominent influencer who actively helped "hitler 2.0" "fascism" "the end of democracy" into office trumps everything else.
Eh idk if it's on purpose but you're kinda inserting this implication that I'm against one candidate more than the other. Even if I come across that way, that's not accurate.Didn’t mischaracterize intentionally, just interpreted using what I thought was a fair premise.
I didn’t think Trump getting elected was so consequential to you though since you advocated to not vote for Kamala, allowing him to get elected. So you’ll have to forgive me for that assumption.
I’m sure you’re losing interest in this back and forth as am I, so if you feel so inclined please respond and we’ll end it there if there are no further clarities sought of me.
We need a 'You dumbass' reaction.
Still playing by old rules. Typically I’d say it’s the right thing to do, but these aren’t typical times.With all the scandals, bombshells etc that happened over the years, it’s amazing that Dems are still worried about that stuff.
Exactly. Not too long ago in our lifetimes, just the smoke of all of these scandals caused the vast majority of politicians to resign.Still playing by old rules. Typically I’d say it’s the right thing to do, but these aren’t typical times.