NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani Thread

"hE dIDnT dIsAgReE wITh mE oR cAlL mE oUt mY nAmE oR tAlK aBoUt mY dEaD fAmIlY mEmBeR oR sPaM aNy ThReAD I cArE aBoUt sO wHaTs tHe pRoBLeM wITH hIS pOsTSs?"

Mocking_SpongeBob.jpg
 
Freeman said:
"hE dIDnT dIsAgReE wITh mE oR cAlL mE oUt mY nAmE oR tAlK aBoUt mY dEaD fAmIlY mEmBeR oR sPaM aNy ThReAD I cArE aBoUt sO wHaTs tHe pRoBLeM wITH hIS pOsTSs?"

View attachment 1598210
Click to expand...

The "final straw" to him getting banned in this specific thread was still not made known

He posted multiple tweets related to thread topic, multiple posters "attacked' him

He responded to the attacks

He got banned

No need to make up arguments that haven't been made when there have already been direct questions asked that still haven't been answered
 
ChicagoFigure said:
In the post I was referring to, nothing that was stated was a bannable offense.

To the rest of your point I already addressed that there are multiple posters who's first interaction with him was not "challenging his views" but rather personally attacking him disrespectfully. I mentioned that to u specifically already and u never responded to it.

I'm not saying there were no issues with how he was moving but when posters would genuinely ask him about his stances ive seen multiple instances where he responded respectfully.
Click to expand...
How do you even know those were their first interactions with him? Seems like you’re making an assumption to further your point.

I was one that genuinely asked him about his stances and I was met with name calling and all kinds of wild shit. I never called him out his name or called him dumb or anything. The worst I did was call him an immigrant cause I knew he was Haitian. When he corrected me I corrected myself going forward to say he was 2nd or 3rd generation.

He got angry with me because I’d ask him about Trump’s stance on immigrants, particularly Haitians eating cats and dogs, seeing as his parents or grandparents were immigrants.
 
TheNightKing said:
How do you even know those were their first interactions with him? Seems like you’re making an assumption to further your point.
Click to expand...
Well what I'm not assuming is those were their first posts to him in those specific threads. If those weren't their first interactions on this board then all that's left to assume is they were the ones following him and harassing him.
TheNightKing said:
I was one that genuinely asked him about his stances and I was met with name calling and all kinds of wild shit. I never called him out his name or called him dumb or anything. The worst I did was call him an immigrant cause I knew he was Haitian. When he corrected me I corrected myself going forward to say he was 2nd or 3rd generation.

He got angry with me because I’d ask him about Trump’s stance on immigrants, particularly Haitians eating cats and dogs, seeing as his parents or grandparents were immigrants.
Click to expand...
Say your specific case is as accurate as u claim, generally that is not how the board in general moves. I've seen it with knock as well, folks will engage to a point then start getting condescending if not outright disrespectful. Regardless it's usually a two way street.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
The "final straw" to him getting banned in this specific thread was still not made known

He posted multiple tweets related to thread topic, multiple posters "attacked' him

He responded to the attacks

He got banned

No need to make up arguments that haven't been made when there have already been direct questions asked that still haven't been answered
Click to expand...
Yeah he was a victim. Im sure when he was following posters who had him on ignore around the site reaction stalking them to the point his reactions had to be disabled it was because they did something to him first as well.

russell-westbrook-yawn.gif


No one owes you answers about it and im annoyed @AP4.0 even entertained this shit.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Well what I'm not assuming is those were their first posts to him in those specific threads. If those weren't their first interactions on this board then all that's left to assume is they were the ones following him and harassing him.

Say your specific case is as accurate as u claim, generally that is not how the board in general moves. I've seen it with knock as well, folks will engage to a point then start getting condescending if not outright disrespectful. Regardless it's usually a two way street.
Click to expand...

I had him on ignore and he continued to tag me and reaction stalk me for weeks along with several other posters. He's not this victim you want him to be
 
Freeman said:
Yeah he was a victim. Im sure when he was following posters who had him on ignore around the site reaction stalking them to the point his reactions had to be disabled it was because they did something to him first as well.

View attachment 1598211

No one owes you answers about it and im annoyed @AP4.0 even entertained this shit.
Click to expand...
I'm not calling him a victim but what I am saying is "y'all" (whoever that applies to) aren't victims.

You're allowed to feel how u feel about me asking questions just like I'm allowed to feel how I feel about how u feel about it.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
I'm not calling him a victim but what I am saying is "y'all" (whoever that applies to) aren't victims.

You're allowed to feel how u feel about me asking questions just like I'm allowed to feel how I feel about how u feel about it.
Click to expand...
You're fucking annoying, have opposing views to many posters and your account has been perfectly fine. There's a way to carry it. He was doing everything but and got dealt with.

He will come back do the exact same things, get banned again and we can have the same discussion then. Rinse, repeat until permanent ban.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Well what I'm not assuming is those were their first posts to him in those specific threads. If those weren't their first interactions on this board then all that's left to assume is they were the ones following him and harassing him.

Say your specific case is as accurate as u claim, generally that is not how the board in general moves. I've seen it with knock as well, folks will engage to a point then start getting condescending if not outright disrespectful. Regardless it's usually a two way street.
Click to expand...
You got multiple posters on here telling you he was out of line, with specific examples of how he was out of line, and yet you persist. That’s your prerogative because this is a message board, but when do you say maybe y’all have a point?
 
BlackRain said:
You'd think at a certain point when multiple people are saying "this is what happened" even the most contrarion would just say "Ok. I was wrong"
Click to expand...
I'm only perturbed with Chicago cause he acting like if he keeps rewording the same question or coming up with more hypotheticals, the responses are going to change

I have absolutely zero reason to lie or exaggerate about B$'s behavior and there's something to, at a minimum, acknowledge that while that might not have been his experience with him, it was with everyone else

I've said a million times if this was my site, it would just be me and maybe 4 other people cause my tolerance for certain stuff is just too small these days so I do my best to not just ban someone cause I might not roll with how they rock but if people are continuously send me messages about one members behavior, then I know it ain't just me
 
ChicagoFigure said:
I'm not calling him a victim but what I am saying is "y'all" (whoever that applies to) aren't victims.

You're allowed to feel how u feel about me asking questions just like I'm allowed to feel how I feel about how u feel about it.
Click to expand...

And those who he kept harassing without provocation? You keep approaching this from the pov of every interaction being equal when it's proven and been shown to you that his interactions were often one sided with him being the person starting it.
 
BlackRain said:
And those who he kept harassing without provocation? You keep approaching this from the pov of every interaction being equal when it's proven and been shown to you that his interactions were often one sided with him being the person starting it.
Click to expand...
He was also wack reaction spamming my posts, unprovoked, until I removed his ability to react.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top