OPINION Contradictions and Lies! Exposing the Democratic Party

BlackRain said:
Im not moving anything. I acknowledged why you say you criticize them more i just don't think you apply that logic as consistently as you think all around. The disagreement has always been rooted in the bold because it's consistently lead to you trying to equate things that lack perspective you either intentionally ignore, you wanna revist that terrible Aaron Roger's and MLK are the same take or Joe Rogan takes, or try and downplay because it's out of your wheelhouse to actually understand ie whenever race is brought into the conversation.
Click to expand...
Okay so I was wrong a couple times. So what. U keep coming back to those examples as if I don't have to keep reminding u I admit it those times. It doesn't negate both parties are the same.
BlackRain said:
You seem to take umbrage at the consistent thought that you're mascarading as a maga republican yet don't see how your consistent defenses of any criticism of them paints that picture. Again given the reasoning you gave if this board was more right leaning then would you be just as critical of Republicans as you are Democrats? Based on what you're saying you would be...but whenever any criticism of them is brought up you jump right to the defense of them to try and minimize things.
Click to expand...
I don't consistently defend Republicans. Most of the time I have to make sure I shit on them while I shit on the Dems or else u guys ignore the substance of what I'm saying and attack the messenger. You specifically do this a lot, in general.

And bc the board is overwhelmingly pro Dem, anyone who consistently attacks them is viewed as republican, bc the bias is heavy in here.
 
This guy refuses to accept that "both parties are the same" is an privilege he enjoys that doesn't apply to us. And to take it one step further he sees it as his role to educate us about how misled we are in our own damn space. The arrogance is astounding.



Shit like this is not a "both sides" thing. This is real. This isn't an individual talking about hot sauce this is the brazen white supremacist agenda of this administration. For you it might be no biggie but for us shit like this is important and for some reason you don't seem to want to understand that. It's the same reason your boy Bernie couldn't get elected as dog catcher if there were black people in Vermont.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
And bc the board is overwhelmingly pro Dem, anyone who consistently attacks them is viewed as republican, bc the bias is heavy in here.
Click to expand...
If the only two options are dems and Republicans, can you see why this is?

My hope is that we eventually get away from this part of the convo
 
There's a whole scam going on and nobody mentioned anything about Tim Walz being in prison.

That's the inconsistent thing in this board

The Dems are only called out when someone has dropped the ball to go after the Republicans in a sense.

Or when its brought about how the dems did x y and z by a poster who don't give a shit about the dems
 
If the Republicans will be called out and have 10 pages of shit about some files, then that scamming shit about what the Dems have done should be on the same level.

Love the dems but dayum, nobody not going to call these folks out on the shit that has been done

Trump can bump his toe and there'll be pages on that goofy shit.

Folks follow that man moves 25/8 on here and comment on every wrong thing that the Republicans do but when the Dems do something....its crickets on this motherfucker.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Okay so I was wrong a couple times. So what. U keep coming back to those examples as if I don't have to keep reminding u I admit it those times. It doesn't negate both parties are the same.

I don't consistently defend Republicans. Most of the time I have to make sure I shit on them while I shit on the Dems or else u guys ignore the substance of what I'm saying and attack the messenger. You specifically do this a lot, in general.

And bc the board is overwhelmingly pro Dem, anyone who consistently attacks them is viewed as republican, bc the bias is heavy in here.
Click to expand...

And there you go being vague again after already admitting that when it comes to specificity the bold doesn't actually hold up under scrutiny. The viewpoint of anybody attacking Dems being Republican is you in your own head. Shit this thread jumped off again because a poster criticized Kamala, said Trump would've been equal and he wasn't called a Republican. Just told his reasoning was wrong. As much as Dis went on his rants nobody viewed him as Republican. And his shit was consistently nonsensical.

The substance of what you're saying doesn't always hold up because of how you try to equate things and when they don't line up instead of just admitting it, you double and triple down.
 
Last edited:
Knock_Twice said:
There's a whole scam going on and nobody mentioned anything about Tim Walz being in prison.

That's the inconsistent thing in this board

The Dems are only called out when someone has dropped the ball to go after the Republicans in a sense.

Or when its brought about how the dems did x y and z by a poster who don't give a shit about the dems
Click to expand...
Dawg

Make a thread about it

I legit don't know what you're talking about
 
AP4.0 said:
If the only two options are dems and Republicans, can you see why this is?

My hope is that we eventually get away from this part of the convo
Click to expand...

Brotha,

You buy from small online outlets etc your clothes and shoes, you shop around.
You dont limit yourself to the big name brands.

Use the same method in regards to the dems vs Republicans.

You always say that its only 2 ppl that I have to choose from

There were more ppl on the ballot who had better policies than Kamala and Trump combined, but you sat on that excuse on it being just those only two.


You dont do this in real life with other things...you stay promoting other no name brands or outlets...do the same when election time comes

Those other candidates popular or not had better policies...

Just admit, you move with the crowd when it comes to voting
 
Inconsistent ass brothas man

I hope 2026 is different

Its only Kamala and Trump that you have to choose from...

But in another thread, man I found this site that sell these clothes and shoes compare to your known big name brands and sites.

Brotha...you know how to do this
 
Knock_Twice said:
Brotha,

You buy from small online outlets etc your clothes and shoes, you shop around.
You dont limit yourself to the big name brands.

Use the same method in regards to the dems vs Republicans.

You always say that its only 2 ppl that I have to choose from

There were more ppl on the ballot who had better policies than Kamala and Trump combined, but you sat on that excuse on it being just those only two.


You dont do this in real life with other things...you stay promoting other no name brands or outlets...do the same when election time comes

Those other candidates popular or not had better policies...

Just admit, you move with the crowd when it comes to voting
Click to expand...
Those people weren't on our ballots which you would know if you went to vote

We've already discussed how this is also an issue that the candidates aren't everywhere for everyone to choose from

Edit: what I should've said was, I believe they weren't but I want to double check to confirm
 
AP4.0 said:
Those people weren't on our ballots which you would know if you went to vote

We've already discussed how this is also an issue that the candidates aren't everywhere for everyone to choose from

Edit: what I should've said was, I believe they weren't but I want to double check to confirm
Click to expand...

What ppl?
So it was only listing 2 ppl on the ballot?
I refuse to believe that....Warren and Cornell wasnt listed on the ballot.?
 
Knock_Twice said:
What ppl?
So it was only listing 2 ppl on the ballot?
I refuse to believe that....Warren and Cornell wasnt listed on the ballot.?
Click to expand...
Was just coming to retract my previous statement.

I stand corrected

Outside of the big 2. Other notable candidates included Jill Stein, Robert Kennedy, Cornell West. Warren was not on the ballot

The others, I had never heard of prior to the election.
 
AP4.0 said:
Was just coming to retract my previous statement.

I stand corrected

Outside of the big 2. Other notable candidates included Jill Stein, Robert Kennedy, Cornell West. Warren was not on the ballot

The others, I had never heard of prior to the election.
Click to expand...
With this being said, which of the candidates were talking about reparations for black people as a pillar of their platform? This isn't a gotcha. I remember Dr West speaking about how it's owed to black people but can't recall if that was a specific issue he was running on.

Your previous response appears to contradict your own stance. Even with other people on the ballot, you were holding out your vote regardless if what they were talking about didn't include a specific plan exclusively for black Americans.
 
AP4.0 said:
If the only two options are dems and Republicans, can you see why this is?

My hope is that we eventually get away from this part of the convo
Click to expand...
They're the only two options bc of the logic that "lesser of two evils" is gonna get us somewhere. If you vote for someone who's part of the problem u are actively supporting the problem.

I want to get away from this part of the convo as well.
 
BlackRain said:
And there you go being vague again after already admitting that when it comes to specificity the bold doesn't actually hold up under scrutiny. The viewpoint of anybody attacking Dems being Republican is you in your own head. Shit this thread jumped off again because a poster criticized Kamala, said Trump would've been equal and he wasn't called a Republican. Just told his reasoning was wrong. As much as Dis went on his rants nobody viewed him as Republican. And his shit was consistently nonsensical.

The substance of what you're saying doesn't always hold up because of how you try to equate things and when they don't line up instead of just admitting it, you double and triple down.
Click to expand...
I stated w nuance in what ways I think both parties are the same many times over the years. When u say I'm being vague it's not bc I can't back up why I have these opinions, it's bc I don't think I have to literally spell it out every time I say "both sides". U seem to think it's something other than what it is.

The doubling and tripping down shit is projection. That post AP made about how the "other side" debates and argues sounds like a lot of u, but for some reason it's only applied to 'one side'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top