"You Can't Date White Women and Be Pro Black", but I bet you'll smash Candace Owens though.

[L.L.R.J.]

Hill’s now ex wife, Keeta Vaccaro, filed for divorce in April 2025 after a heated domestic dispute at their Miami condo. The case ended with the divorce being officially finalized in August 2025, and Keeta walking away with a serious financial package:

A $500,000 lump-sum payout

$20,000–$50,000 per month in ongoing support•

Nearly $457,000 in legal fees covered by Hill

$100,000 for a new car

Exclusive use of their $5.5M Miami condo, with Hill covering mortgage, utilities, insurance, and living expensesNot everything went her way — the court denied her request to keep Hill’s $200K Bentley SUV and unrestricted access to his debit cards. But overall, she left the 17-month marriage with millions in assets and financial security.

 

[Northside7]

Pathetic.

 

[BlackRain]

Hill’s now ex wife, Keeta Vaccaro, filed for divorce in April 2025 after a heated domestic dispute at their Miami condo. The case ended with the divorce being officially finalized in August 2025, and Keeta walking away with a serious financial package:

A $500,000 lump-sum payout

$20,000–$50,000 per month in ongoing support•

Nearly $457,000 in legal fees covered by Hill

$100,000 for a new car

Exclusive use of their $5.5M Miami condo, with Hill covering mortgage, utilities, insurance, and living expensesNot everything went her way — the court denied her request to keep Hill’s $200K Bentley SUV and unrestricted access to his debit cards. But overall, she left the 17-month marriage with millions in assets and financial security.

Don't have outside kids on your wife. That might help.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Don't have outside kids on your wife. That might help.

That's your takeaway, huh? The one cosign you got is unsurprising too. lol

I don't care how much cheating he did. That settlement is system assisted larceny.

That broad asked for unrestricted access to his debit cards. It's a joke now. These chicks have no interest in being married. They just know them dudes will slip up at some point which will mean instant payday for them.

 

[BlackRain]

That's your takeaway, huh? The one cosign you got is unsurprising too. lol

I don't care how much cheating he did. That settlement is system assisted larceny.

That broad asked for unrestricted access to his debit cards. It's a joke now. These chicks have no interest in being married. They just know them dudes will slip up at some point which will mean instant payday for them.

Well it's one of them. Nigga cheated left and right and had outside kids...and it's a shock that a multimillionaire has a divorce settlement that results this way. Don't be stupid and it minimizes the chances of bad ahit happening. Hence the word "might". I never said I agreed with it. But it's a known risk.

Or since one of your takeaways is she had no interest in being married how about a better vetting job of the person you pledge to spend your life with? If by your own words, it's basically inevitable for them dudes to slip up why put yourself in a position to suffer this bad of a financial blow? Can't absolve that man of his role in this shit...and since I'm a man I'm more inclined for other men to hede that message. Don't do stupid shit that can cost you a ton of money if you're up several million dollars. (Which the average person isn't so this isn't indicative of the average divorce settlement)

 

[Mr BFK]

Well it's one of them. Nigga cheated left and right and had outside kids...and it's a shock that a multimillionaire has a divorce settlement that results this way. Don't be stupid and it minimizes the chances of bad ahit happening. Hence the word "might". I never said I agreed with it. But it's a known risk.

Or since one of your takeaways is she had no interest in being married how about a better vetting job of the person you pledge to spend your life with? If by your own words, it's basically inevitable for them dudes to slip up why put yourself in a position to suffer this bad of a financial blow? Can't absolve that man of his role in this shit...and since I'm a man I'm more inclined for other men to hede that message. Don't do stupid shit that can cost you a ton of money if you're up several million dollars. (Which the average person isn't so this isn't indicative of the average divorce settlement)

but nothing about the woman being a shark for his pockets tho right?


u acting like there aren't "wives" out here that aint gunning for a dudes pockets even if he is the faithful perfect husband


no court system should be sanctioning financial extortion like that regardless of gender

 

[BRIAN B.]

unrestricted access to the debit cards huh?



shoot for the stars you'll land on the moon I guess

 

[BlackRain]

but nothing about the woman being a shark for his pockets tho right?


u acting like there aren't "wives" out here that aint gunning for a dudes pockets even if he is the faithful perfect husband


no court system should be sanctioning financial extortion like that regardless of gender

Well that would be part of telling men to be careful of who they make their wives. There's risk in everything. Nothing is guaranteed at all so no matter what you throw out there, there's nothing that really makes it a bad thing to say the goal, especially if you've got alot of money, is to minimize the chances of putting yourself in a position to lose large amounts of said money. Those types of women existed before Tyreek Hill and they'll be there after him. So avoiding them and situations where they can take advantage of you should be a priority.

When you don't do that or purposely put yourself in a situation where you fucked up multiple times, I don't really have that much sympathy for you. I already said I don't agree with how the courts treat some cases, but in this specific instance we ain't out here dealing with husband of the year so a hypothetical about it means literally nothing for this specific topic.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Well it's one of them. Nigga cheated left and right and had outside kids...and it's a shock that a multimillionaire has a divorce settlement that results this way. Don't be stupid and it minimizes the chances of bad ahit happening. Hence the word "might". I never said I agreed with it. But it's a known risk.

Or since one of your takeaways is she had no interest in being married how about a better vetting job of the person you pledge to spend your life with? If by your own words, it's basically inevitable for them dudes to slip up why put yourself in a position to suffer this bad of a financial blow? Can't absolve that man of his role in this shit...and since I'm a man I'm more inclined for other men to hede that message. Don't do stupid shit that can cost you a ton of money if you're up several million dollars. (Which the average person isn't so this isn't indicative of the average divorce settlement)

I'm not absolving him of anything. If his actions led to a divorce, that's fine. He has to pay, but there is no justification for him being taxed the way he was. That shouldn't be legal, but it's standard operating procedure and, for some reason, you believe that's acceptable.

 

[GNS]

unrestricted access to the debit cards huh?



shoot for the stars you'll land on the moon I guess

Shit is disgusting man
Imagine fixing your face to make that a request in a hearing

Nah everybody gotta go

 

[BlackRain]

I'm not absolving him of anything. If his actions led to a divorce, that's fine. He has to pay, but there is no justification for him being taxed the way he was. That shouldn't be legal, but it's standard operating procedure and, for some reason, you believe that's acceptable.

So you completely skipped over "I dont agree with it"? There's not one part where I said it's acceptable. I just said he knew rhe risk he was taking should he behave a certain way during their relationship. You may not care how much cheating he did...system ain't set up like that and he knew that already. So oh well. Tough break nigga.

 

[Old Man Cain]

Hill’s now ex wife, Keeta Vaccaro, filed for divorce in April 2025 after a heated domestic dispute at their Miami condo. The case ended with the divorce being officially finalized in August 2025, and Keeta walking away with a serious financial package:

A $500,000 lump-sum payout

$20,000–$50,000 per month in ongoing support•

Nearly $457,000 in legal fees covered by Hill

$100,000 for a new car

Exclusive use of their $5.5M Miami condo, with Hill covering mortgage, utilities, insurance, and living expensesNot everything went her way — the court denied her request to keep Hill’s $200K Bentley SUV and unrestricted access to his debit cards. But overall, she left the 17-month marriage with millions in assets and financial security.

Its clearly no reason for wealthy athletes to get married till AFTER they're out of the league. No kids no wife just get your money and fuck hoes

 

[The Lonious Monk]

So you completely skipped over "I dont agree with it"? There's not one part where I said it's acceptable. I just said he knew rhe risk he was taking should he behave a certain way during their relationship. You may not care how much cheating he did...system ain't set up like that and he knew that already. So oh well. Tough break nigga.

So you don't agree with the way the system works and think it's wrong, then why are you more pressed to say "Tough Break nigga" than "they system is fucked and it needs to be fixed."

If it was any other situation, particularly something that hurt women, you'd be on here crying to the hills about how we should fix it. You'd be going to war with anyone who dismissed the problem and suggested that the women should know better or do better. For some reason, since this is a problem that typically affects men, you don't seem to have any empathy for the victim. Yes, he is a victim because the system was basically used as a weapon against him in this case.

At the end of the day, if Hill did wrong by his wife, he deserves to pay some consequences. Any one of those things listed should have sufficed following a failed 17-month marriage. However, to hit him with all of that for a marriage that barely lasted more than a year is crazy and should be offputting to any reasonable person especially men.

 

[BlackRain]

So you don't agree with the way the system works and think it's wrong, then why are you more pressed to say "Tough Break nigga" than "they system is fucked and it needs to be fixed."

If it was any other situation, particularly something that hurt women, you'd be on here crying to the hills about how we should fix it. You'd be going to war with anyone who dismissed the problem and suggested that the women should know better or do better. For some reason, since this is a problem that typically affects men, you don't seem to have any empathy for the victim. Yes, he is a victim because the system was basically used as a weapon against him in this case.

At the end of the day, if Hill did wrong by his wife, he deserves to pay some consequences. Any one of those things listed should have sufficed following a failed 17-month marriage. However, to hit him with all of that for a marriage that barely lasted more than a year is crazy and should be offputting to any reasonable person especially men.

The bold is you projecting an assumption. You could just ask but you based your entire reaction to a one sentence response off your own assumption. Nothing in my post expressed any empathy at all for that woman. Would it make you feel better if I called her a gold digging hoe? I'm not pressed to say anything. You seem to be pressed to see someone talk down on her feel sympathy for somebody that showed none for themselves in Tyreek Hill. You care about that man's finances more than he does. If he did then maybe he would've handled himself better. I don't have sympathy for adults, and that includes women since you can't seem to decipher that, who knowingly put themselves in situations where they can financially be hurt like that. He knew the risks everytime he stepped out on that woman and didn't think those possible consequences were enough to stop him. So he gets the results he knew were a possibility.

I also know the system doesn't work like this in every case or even the majority of cases because the majority of people who get divorced and have divorce settlements aren't multimillionaires dividing up multiple properties and luxury vehicles. So reacting to this as if its a normal thing with divorce isn't realistic. However for those who are rich enough that this would be a concern for then there's little sympathy for people who purposely fuck their own lives up. It should be fixed but until it is, niggas who are in that tax bracket need to handle themselves accordingly and either not get married at all or not fuck other women and get them pregnant while married and do a better job of minimizing their chances of getting fucked over. It ain't rocket science and you debating against telling men to proceed with caution is an odd hill to die on. And since you wanted to mention who liked my initial post, clearly I ain't the only person who sees that simple logic as more than the person you pointed out agrees

 

[BlackRain]

Its clearly no reason for wealthy athletes to get married till AFTER they're out of the league. No kids no wife just get your money and fuck hoes

Exactly. Plenty athletes have come out and said they waited til after they retired to settle down for partially this reason. They knew their lifestyle didn't mesh with being a married family man. Shit look at Derek Jeter. Man lived a great life and people knew he was fucking hoes left and right to the point they "Derek Jeter gift basket" became a running joke. He retired and now is a family man.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

The bold is you projecting an assumption. You could just ask but you based your entire reaction to a one sentence response off your own assumption. Nothing in my post expressed any empathy at all for that woman. Would it make you feel better if I called her a gold digging hoe? I'm not pressed to say anything. You seem to be pressed to see someone talk down on her feel sympathy for somebody that showed none for themselves in Tyreek Hill. You care about that man's finances more than he does. If he did then maybe he would've handled himself better. I don't have sympathy for adults, and that includes women since you can't seem to decipher that, who knowingly put themselves in situations where they can financially be hurt like that. He knew the risks everytime he stepped out on that woman and didn't think those possible consequences were enough to stop him. So he gets the results he knew were a possibility.

I also know the system doesn't work like this in every case or even the majority of cases because the majority of people who get divorced and have divorce settlements aren't multimillionaires dividing up multiple properties and luxury vehicles. So reacting to this as if its a normal thing with divorce isn't realistic. However for those who are rich enough that this would be a concern for then there's little sympathy for people who purposely fuck their own lives up. It should be fixed but until it is, niggas who are in that tax bracket need to handle themselves accordingly and either not get married at all or not fuck other women and get them pregnant while married and do a better job of minimizing their chances of getting fucked over. It ain't rocket science and you debating against telling men to proceed with caution is an odd hill to die on

Yes, it's an assumption, but it's not based off one sentence in this post. It's based off of observations of you over the course of many discussions on here. I never said anyone should talk down on her. That's just you making up bullshit. My issue is and has always been with the system. In the previous post, I say that she deserves something if Hill violated their marriage. The problem is the extent to which the court punished him for that violation. It was excessive.

And no one is debating against telling men to proceed with caution. Men should proceed with caution. That doesn't mean we should be accepting of the system being so fucked up. And again how would you react if this was about a half naked chick getting groped in a club. You wouldn't have this same energy. You'd be the one debating against telling women to proceed with caution. That's not an assumption. I've literally seen you do it.

 

[BlackRain]

Yes, it's an assumption, but it's not based off one sentence in this post. It's based off of observations of you over the course of many discussions on here. I never said anyone should talk down on her. That's just you making up bullshit. My issue is and has always been with the system. In the previous post, I say that she deserves something if Hill violated their marriage. The problem is the extent to which the court punished him for that violation. It was excessive.

And no one is debating against telling men to proceed with caution. Men should proceed with caution. That doesn't mean we should be accepting of the system being so fucked up. And again how would you react if this was about a half naked chick getting groped in a club. You wouldn't have this same energy. You'd be the one debating against telling women to proceed with caution. That's not an assumption. I've literally seen you do it.

You see that question mark on that comment about calling her a gold digger? That means it's just that a question not an assumption. And we know the system has a bias once you get to a certain tax bracket. Thats why minimizing risk should be a priority so long as it works the way it does.

Also...A woman having someone physically violate her body is nowhere near the same level as a divorce settlement. What the hell kind of example is that? A divorce settlement and sexual harrassment are not in the same ballpark. Those are nowhere near the same 2 scenarios at all and the fact that you find them comparable is weird as hell. Theres plently examples you could've used and the fact that you went to violating a woman physically is odd. Especially when in each of my posts I've specifically mentioned the word financially.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

You see that question mark on that comment about calling her a gold digger? That means it's just that a question not an assumption. And we know the system has a bias once you get to a certain tax bracket. Thats why minimizing risk should be a priority so long as it works the way it does.

Also...A woman having someone physically violate her body is nowhere near the same level as a divorce settlement. What the hell kind of example is that? A divorce settlement and sexual harrassment are not in the same ballpark. Those are nowhere near the same 2 scenarios at all. Especially when in each of my posts I've specifically mentioned the word financially.

I don't really understand what you mean in your first paragraph. Whether she is a gold digger or not is irrelevant. She was only married to him for 17 months and they don't have any kids. That means she didn't play a significant role in his ability to earn that money and property and she hasn't been with him long enough to tie her life to him so inextricably that it would be difficult to move on without him. There is no reason that 500K lump sum shouldn't have been the sole judgement. She most likely would have left the marriage better than she entered it, so why was all that other stuff necessary?

As for the rest, get the fuck out of here. A chick having her ass grabbed in the club is bad, but being stripped of millions of dollars worth of cash and property is worse and you know that.

 

[BlackRain]

I don't really understand what you mean in your first paragraph. Whether she is a gold digger or not is irrelevant. She was only married to him for 17 months and they don't have any kids. That means she didn't play a significant role in his ability to earn that money and property and she hasn't been with him long enough to tie her life to him so inextricably that it would be difficult to move on without him. There is no reason that 500K lump sum shouldn't have been the sole judgement. She most likely would have left the marriage better than she entered it, so why was all that other stuff necessary?

As for the rest, get the fuck out of here. A chick having her ass grabbed in the club is bad, but being stripped of millions of dollars worth of cash and property is worse and you know that.

It ain't like he just met that woman and married her a week later. They been together for years. So boiling their relationship down to just their marriage is highly inaccurate. You might want to expand your timeline on that if thats what you're basing what she deserves on. You know you could've simply asked "Do you think she deserves that settlement" instead of just jumping off yhe porch on your rant. The answer is, as I already said, no she doesn't but again he knew the game he was playing and still chose to marry her and have a kid with her. All of this shit is very easy to just google.

As for the rest...we just gonna disagree on that one. You chose a really shitty example when you could've just used a similar example of high profile women who've gotten divorced but had to do payments or settlements to their former husbands which there are there for you to pull from. Instead you're 1st go to example is a woman being physically violated as a comparison and don't see that as odd?

 

[The Lonious Monk]

It ain't like he just met that woman and married her a week later. They been together for years. So boiling their relationship down to just their marriage is highly inaccurate. You might want to expand your timeline on that if thats what you're basing what she deserves on. You know you could've simply asked "Do you think she deserves that settlement" instead of just jumping off yhe porch on your rant. The answer is, as I already said, no she doesn't but again he knew the game he was playing and still chose to marry her.

As for the rest...we just gonna disagree on that one. You chose a really shitty example when you could've just used a similar example of high profile women who've gotten divorced but had to do payments or settlements to their former husbands which there are there for you to pull from. Instead you're 1st go to example is a woman being physically violated as a comparison and don't see that as odd?

How long they been together before they got married is irrelevant. She's not entitled to anything for that time. Like they could have been together for 20 years, if they weren't married she wouldn't have gotten shit. The marriage is the part that entitles her to compensation. And I didn't ask you if you think she deserved the settlement because I didn't care. If you remember, my first post was about you seeing that crazy settlement and instantly going at Hill. That's the problem. You saw something that you supposedly believe is unjust and chose to go at the victim.

I chose that example because it's something you've actually argued for. We've never had a discussion about some high level woman losing money. So no it's not odd. It's based on precedent of our discussions. When it's a woman being violated, you understand that blaming the victim shouldn't be your first reaction. When it's a man being violated, you have no problem beating up on him immediately. That was the point of the comparison. I don't see why that's so hard for you to comprehend. No one was saying that sexual harassment and financial fleecing are the same. I, for the life of me, can't understand how so many of ya'll got all the way through high school and don't understand how analogies work.