Tory Lanez Sentenced to 10 Years for 2020 Shooting of Megan Thee Stallion

A lot of emotions flying back and forth in here right now but I'm not here for that.

Let's keep it on task. We just heard the man, whose trial testimony almost exclusively nailed the coffin on Tory's defense, say quite clearly on the night of the incident that "and the girl shoots."
 
unSCENE said:
A lot of emotions flying back and forth in here right now but I'm not here for that.

Let's keep it on task. We just heard the man, whose trial testimony almost exclusively nailed the coffin on Tory's defense, say quite clearly on the night of the incident that "and the girl shoots."
Click to expand...

Then what would be the point of Tory and his team spending all that time saying Meg was never even shot? They're still pushing that now. This audio only looks good to someone who supports Tory. To anyone with sense it just makes him look dumb
 
BlackRain said:
Then what would be the point of Tory and his team spending all that time saying Meg was never even shot? They're still pushing that now. This audio only looks good to someone who supports Tory. To anyone with sense it just makes him look dumb
Click to expand...
If he ain't shoot that girl why was he tryna bribe them and why would kelsey text megs bodyguard tory shot meg.

If it doesnt make sense it's not true. Yes they all lied but meg's lies made sense. At no point does tory's everchanging story match up with any physical evidence.
 
shutupGabi said:
If he ain't shoot that girl why was he tryna bribe them and why would kelsey text megs bodyguard tory shot meg.

If it doesnt make sense it's not true. Yes they all lied but meg's lies made sense. At no point does tory's everchanging story match up with any physical evidence.
Click to expand...
Who has the motive Gabi? The dude who wasn't in a physical altercation or the chick who got hands put on her. Take Meg's account out of it cause we know she lied about everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNS
BlackRain said:
Then what would be the point of Tory and his team spending all that time saying Meg was never even shot? They're still pushing that now. This audio only looks good to someone who supports Tory. To anyone with sense it just makes him look dumb
Click to expand...

"The audio only looks good to someone who supports Tory," might be the most naive and stubborn statement I've seen all week. But it is consistent with the general consensus so it's an easy position to take.

There were only two present witnesses during the trial to say Tory shot Meg.
One was Meg, who was on record as being intoxicated that night...
And the other, whom was sober, on the night of the incident when your memory is freshest with minimal influence told police that the woman was shooting.

So the question becomes why did he change his witness testimony? Why did Meg withhold information about the fight with Kelsey until she was forced to do so? And why is the thought that Tory randomly upped pole while two women were fighting more believable than one of the intoxicated women fighting upped pole?

I won't ever eliminate the possibility that he did it but the continued insistence that it's a 100% certainty is fucking ridiculous at this point. Thus the whole reasonable doubt and he probably shouldn't be in prison thing.
 
unSCENE said:
"The audio only looks good to someone who supports Tory," might be the most naive and stubborn statement I've seen all week. But it is consistent with the general consensus so it's an easy position to take.

There were only two present witnesses during the trial to say Tory shot Meg.
One was Meg, who was on record as being intoxicated that night...
And the other, whom was sober, on the night of the incident when your memory is freshest with minimal influence told police that the woman was shooting.

So the question becomes why did he change his witness testimony? Why did Meg withhold information about the fight with Kelsey until she was forced to do so? And why is the thought that Tory randomly upped pole while two women were fighting more believable than one of the intoxicated women fighting upped pole?

I won't ever eliminate the possibility that he did it but the continued insistence that it's a 100% certainty is fucking ridiculous at this point. Thus the whole reasonable doubt and he probably shouldn't be in prison thing.
Click to expand...

It's more believable because of Tory himself. I say the audio looks good to people who support Tory because it aligns with their idea that Meg was never shot to begin with which has already been proven false. As much as people harp on the "Meg lied" thing people blatantly ignore the lies Tory has continued to tell too. And they're so inconsistent that it doesn't create the reasonbale doubt he was hoping for. Instead it just made him look like he was covering something up.
 
BlackRain said:
It's more believable because of Tory himself. I say the audio looks good to people who support Tory because it aligns with their idea that Meg was never shot to begin with which has already been proven false. As much as people harp on the "Meg lied" thing people blatantly ignore the lies Tory has continued to tell too. And they're so inconsistent that it doesn't create the reasonbale doubt he was hoping for. Instead it just made him look like he was covering something up.
Click to expand...

See that's the thing... he was also drunk and likely weighs about a buck 40 when wet. I don't expect him to have had a thorough recollection of the situation either. I fully believe everyone except the driver, and the witness who claimed that night that a woman was the shooter, was a sip away from black out drunk.

Inconsistencies without proof to the contrary = reasonable doubt.
 
unSCENE said:
See that's the thing... he was also drunk and likely weighs about a buck 40 when wet. I don't expect him to have had a thorough recollection of the situation either. I fully believe everyone except the driver, and the witness who claimed that night that a woman was the shooter, was a sip away from black out drunk.

Inconsistencies without proof to the contrary = reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...

Then he should have either testified in his own defense or stopped being stupid enough to think trying to create reasonable doubt on social media and his album would work in a courtroom. Also would've helped if he didn't have a documented history of fights and lying about what happened.
 
unSCENE said:
A lot of emotions flying back and forth in here right now but I'm not here for that.

Let's keep it on task. We just heard the man, whose trial testimony almost exclusively nailed the coffin on Tory's defense, say quite clearly on the night of the incident that "and the girl shoots."
Click to expand...
Wait what?

They have audio proof of an eye witness watching it in real time saying the other girl shot Meg?

Well damn.
 
Chi-Town B said:
To take the heat off her, why would she text that she shot her.
Click to expand...
Ok so then what was this

FkERosWUUAA1QyZ.jpg:large


Why he didnt stfu and say nothing. If kelsey ain't shoot meg the next logical conclusion was he did it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top