As of the end of December, SVB had roughly $209 billion in total assets and $175.4 billion in total deposits, according to the press release. The FDIC said it was unclear what portion of those deposits were above the insurance limit.
The last U.S. bank failure of this size was Washington Mutual in 2008, which had $307 billion in assets.
SVB was a major bank for venture-backed companies, which were already under pressure due to higher interest rates and a slowdown for initial public offerings that made it more difficult to raise additional cash.
The closure of SVB would impact not only the deposits, but also credit facilities and other forms of financing. The FDIC said loan customers of SVB should continue to make their payments as normal.
The move represents a rapid downfall for SVB. On Wednesday, the bank announced it was looking to raise more than $2 billion in additional capital after suffering a $1.8 billion loss on asset sales.
The shares of parent company SVB Financial Group
fell 60% Thursday, and dropped another 60% in premarket trading Friday before being halted.
CNBC's David Faber
reported Friday morning that the efforts to raise capital had failed and that SVB had pivoted toward a potential sale. However, a rapid outflow of deposits was complicating the sale process.
While many Wall Street analysts have argued that the struggles for SVB are
unlikely to spread to the broader banking system, shares of other midsized and regional banks were
under pressure Friday.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said during testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee on Friday morning that she was "monitoring very carefully" developments at a few banks. Yellen made her comments before the FDIC announcement.
Shortly after leaving Capitol Hill, Yellen convened a meeting of top officials at the Fed, the FDIC and the Comptroller of the Currency specifically to discuss the situation at SVB.
www.cnbc.com
” nonchalant af lmao