
Smoking gun? Linking gun ownership to crime victimization
Using linked individual data on concealed handgun permits (CHP), reported crimes and arrests, I examine the dynamics of gun-ownership and criminal vic…
![]()
Smoking gun? Linking gun ownership to crime victimization
Using linked individual data on concealed handgun permits (CHP), reported crimes and arrests, I examine the dynamics of gun-ownership and criminal vic…www.sciencedirect.com
One of those kids is from Suitland. I grew up in Suitland. Finding access to a gun there is easier than finding a McDonald's.
yep I graduated from Suitland so I know that area wellOne of those kids is from Suitland. I grew up in Suitland. Finding access to a gun there is easier than finding a McDonald's.
yep I graduated from Suitland so I know that area well
but let's not act like the law was really a factor in these kids getting guns illegally
mofos acting like passing laws will make legal manufacturers go away, ergo less guns available
but people easily forget that the guns that have already been built will still exist
guns pretty much last a lifetime so the issue of availability will still not be resolved
What kills me about the anti-gun/anti-assault rifle perspective is that it does not address mental health. Simply banning guns won't fix the larger issues driving people towards violence. Taking away guns will lead to people using alternative means to inflict the same violence. I understand the argument that it's too easy to acquire a gun in some states, but that doesn't change that sick people will find a way, one way or another, to express their mental anguish through violence if that is their plan. Pretty much all of these mass shootings are well planned out. Take away the gun, well they still have time to plan and their issues to motivate them.
yep I graduated from Suitland so I know that area well
but let's not act like the law was really a factor in these kids getting guns illegally
mofos acting like passing laws will make legal manufacturers go away, ergo less guns available
but people easily forget that the guns that have already been built will still exist
guns pretty much last a lifetime so the issue of availability will still not be resolved
That's just not true. The Oklahoma City bombing killed way moreTake away the gun they kill way less people. Guns can kill 20 people in 5 minutes. Can’t do that with any other weapon.
That's just not true. The Oklahoma City bombing killed way more
But in the super pro-gun control people’s mind, it wouldn’t be “as easy” to commit atrocities if tougher laws were passed….
yep I graduated from Suitland so I know that area well
but let's not act like the law was really a factor in these kids getting guns illegally
mofos acting like passing laws will make legal manufacturers go away, ergo less guns available
but people easily forget that the guns that have already been built will still exist
guns pretty much last a lifetime so the issue of availability will still not be resolved
The thought behind that is by lessening the amount of guns available it also lessens the amount of illegal guns available because contrary to popular belief people aren't out here building their own guns in mass. So by definition with less guns on the street then it wouldn't be as easy because thered be less guns available after a certain point. The problem with implementing that is we live in a country with more guns than human beings.
Ok yes bombs are more effective than guns we literally talked about this 1000 times. And bombing don’t happen as much as shootings for a reason. And knives can kill to but not the same way as a gun
explain ur reasons for the underlined
because I'd rather us defend against guns than against mofos with bombs
guns tend to be impulsive with a specific target with a specific number of casualties
bombs are a different story........and it's not as hard to make bombs/explosives as the average person thinks
the fact that unstable mofos seem to lean towards committing mass shootings instead of bombings should be a clue that there is something else going on that is preventable vs. just saying it's the access to guns
u would be surprised @ the reality of the underlined tho
plus as 3D printing becomes easier this becomes even more of an issue
the point tho is that u are correct that there are already more guns in the USA than people at this point
so really there should be a cultural shift vs. just thinking "getting rid of guns" will solve the problems with public violence
"Super pro -gun control"
![]()