Welcome To aBlackWeb

Chicago tentatively settles lawsuit over police shooting of bystander Bettie Jones

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-shooting-lawsuit-settled-20180608-story.html

Chicago tentatively settles lawsuit over police shooting of bystander killed when cop fired at bat-wielding teen


The city of Chicago has tentatively settled a lawsuit by the family of an innocent bystander who was fatally shot by a Chicago police officer as he opened fire at a teen carrying a baseball bat.

The proposed settlement with the family of Bettie Jones came days before the lawsuit was to go to trial at the Daley Center courthouse.

The Chicago Tribune obtained a copy of an order signed by Judge Rena Marie Van Tine saying that the Jones’ lawsuit “has been settled by agreement of the parties.”

The payout by the city could be significant since Jones, 55, was accidentally shot by Officer Robert Rialmo as he fired at Quintonio LeGrier,19, as the teen carried a bat during a domestic disturbance on the West Side a day after Christmas in 2015.

A trial is still scheduled for the lawsuit brought by the family of LeGrier, who was also fatally shot. Jury selection is expected to begin as soon as Monday.

Lawyers for Jones’ estate had taken part in 2½ days of discussions in court this week on what evidence would be heard at trial. But as those discussions resumed Friday afternoon in Van Tine’s courtroom, the Jones’ lawyers were conspicuous in their absence.

No word of the settlement was uttered in court Friday. The only hint came before a lunch break when LeGrier’s lawyer said he would adopt the motions that had been brought by Jones’ lawyer, the first indication that the Jones’ estate would not be part of the final trial preparations.

Larry Rogers Jr., an attorney for the Jones estate, left out a back way without comment.

Bill McCaffrey, a spokesman for the city’s Law Department, later declined to comment, saying the city won’t discuss “potential settlements prior to testifying at the Committee on Finance.”

The settlement needs the approval of the City Council’s Finance Committee and then the full council. The amount of the settlement won’t officially be known until then.

The shooting has garnered intense scrutiny not only because a bystander was killed but also because it was the first fatal police shooting since the court-ordered release a month earlier of video of a white officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times.

The release of the video in November 2015 sparked weeks of protest, upheaval in the Police Department and City Hall, and a U.S. Department of Justice investigation that found Chicago police to be badly trained and prone to excessive force. Efforts to overhaul the department and curb uses of force continue more than two years later.

About 4:30 a.m. on the day after Christmas 2015, Rialmo and his partner responded to 911 calls about a domestic disturbance at an apartment in the 4700 block of West Erie Street where LeGrier was staying with his father. LeGrier, apparently suffering from mental health problems, had behaved strangely as a student at Northern Illinois University and had run-ins with police and other students, records show.

Jones, who lived downstairs, pointed police to the second floor. Then LeGrier came down the stairs with a baseball bat, according to an analysis released more than a year ago by Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx's office, which declined to bring criminal charges against Rialmo. As Rialmo backed down the stairs, he fired eight times, hitting LeGrier six times, prosecutors found. Jones, who stood behind the teen during the incident, was shot once in the chest.

Investigators from the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, the city agency set up last year to strengthen police discipline, raised doubts about Rialmo's accounts of the shooting, determining that the evidence suggested LeGrier likely did not swing the bat at Rialmo as the officer contended. COPA's ruling also found that Rialmo was probably farther from LeGrier when he fired the shots than the officer contended.

The city's lawyers had waged an aggressive but unsuccessful battle to prevent Mayor Rahm Emanuel and police Superintendent Eddie Johnson from having to testify in the case. In March, Emanuel sat for a rare deposition, testifying behind closed doors for more than three hours. A transcript of the deposition has not been made public.

COPA had recommended that Johnson seek to fire Rialmo, but Johnson ruled that the officer acted reasonably and should not be punished for the shooting.

Rialmo took the unusual step of suing the city, alleging in part that he was inadequately trained. Rialmo is also suing LeGrier's estate, blaming the teen for the shooting and contending it emotionally traumatized the officer.

Rialmo, who also faces a separate disciplinary investigation and misdemeanor criminal charges over a December bar fight, remains on paid desk duty and stripped of his police powers.
 
https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/c...r-16-million-quintonio-legrier-robert-rialmo/

City’s settlement with Bettie Jones estate is $16 million: sources


The estate of Bettie Jones — an innocent bystander fatally shot by Officer Robert Rialmo in 2015 — has agreed to settle with the city for $16 million, sources said Monday.

The settlement with the estate of the 55-year-old grandmother was reached last Friday, just days before the wrongful death trial was expected to start. It is still subject to approval from the Finance Committee and full City Council. But terms were not disclosed at that time.

“While no amount of money can ever compensate Bettie Jones’ family for the loss of their mother, we fought for and the City of Chicago has agreed to pay an amount that is fair when compared to local and national police-involved shooting cases,” Larry Rogers, Jr. and Jonathan Thomas, attorney for the Jones estate, said in a statement.

“This settlement respects who Bettie Jones was, that she died unjustifiably and it will allow the Jones family to begin with the healing process and move forward with their lives,” the statement added.

Shortly after the Dec. 26, 2015 shooting, Chicago Police took the unprecedented step of saying that Jones was “accidentally” shot.

The wrongful death suits against the city and Rialmo were filed shortly after the officer fatally shot the two people in the 4700 block of West Erie on Dec. 26, 2015. The shooting was the first fatal shooting by a Chicago police officer after the release of the Laquan McDonald video.

Police were called to Quintonio LeGrier’s father’s home for a domestic incident between Antonio LeGrier and his son — who was suffering from a mental episode as he was home on winter break from Northern Illinois University.

After Jones opened the front door for Rialmo, the younger LeGrier charged at Riamo with a metal baseball bat. The officer opened fire, killing both Quintonio LeGrier and Jones.

The city’s Law Department declined to comment on the settlement proposal since it is still subject to approval.

Joel Brodsky, Rialmo’s attorney, issued a statement saying that Rialmo has “no problem” with the agreement and the city’s intent to settle was “a vindication of his actions.”


“Officer Rialmo has no problem with the City of Chicago paying compensation to the family of Bettie Jones, even though there is a question of legal liability, because she was assisting the police when she was killed,” Brodsky said.

“Since Officer Rialmo is not a party to the settlement, and is being voluntarily dismissed by the Jones Estate, the only possible conclusion is that the City of Chicago is paying for its own negligent actions, and not because of anything Officer Rialmo did. Officer Rialmo and his attorneys consider the dismissal of the claims against him to be a vindication of his actions on December 26, 2015.”

The settlement agreement with the Jones estate is one of the largest, if not the largest, for a single person in the city’s history. Last year, the City Council approved a $31 million settlement with the Englewood Four. Also last year, a federal jury returned a $44.7 million verdict for a man shot in the head by a Chicago Police officer.

The LeGrier estate’s wrongful death lawsuit is still active and is expected to go to trial this month, with jury selection beginning this week.

Last year, COPA — formerly the Independent Police Review Authority — ruled that Rialmo was not justified when he shot LeGrier and Jones. The police oversight agency recommended he be fired.

The investigators say evidence suggested Rialmo was farther from LeGrier than he said he was when he fired on the teen.

Johnson rebuked those findings and recommendations in a letter to COPA, saying that Rialmo’s actions were within department policy. Eventually, a single member of the police board found that there was sufficient cause to bring the shooting case before the full police board. That matter is still pending.


Attorneys for the LeGrier and Jones estates filed several motions for sanctions against the city throughout the pre-trial proceedings, arguing that city attorneys allowed an expert witness to give false testimony.
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ier-police-shooting-trial-20180621-story.html

Father weeps as he recalls loss of son in 2015 police shooting: 'I still don't know what happened'


His voice at times raspy and high-pitched as he wept, Antonio LeGrier told jurors Thursday of the pain of losing his son in a divisive Chicago police shooting and contradicted the testimony of the officer who shot him.

Later, under pointed questioning on cross-examination, LeGrier told the jury how he had barricaded the door to his room with a board and called 911 after his son, Quintonio, rapped against the bedroom door with a baseball bat.

LeGrier’s testimony came on the fourth day of the trial at the Daley Center courthouse over his lawsuit and other litigation stemming from Officer Robert Rialmo’s shooting of his 19-year-old son, who approached the officer with the baseball bat early on the morning after Christmas 2015.

Bystander Bettie Jones, 55, who lived downstairs from LeGrier at his West Side home, was accidentally shot and killed. Earlier this month, the city tentatively settled a lawsuit with her family for $16 million, avoiding trial.

LeGrier, who is suing the officer and the city, cried on the stand as he remembered his son’s death. He testified he was coming down the stairs when shots rang out but did not witness the shooting. He found his son mortally wounded in the vestibule, he said.

“Everything was taken away from me,” he said. “What happened? I still don’t know what happened.”

LeGrier’s testimony contrasted with Rialmo’s time on the stand the two previous days when the officer demonstrated repeatedly how he said the teen held the bat over his head and swung it after barreling down the apartment steps. Rialmo also testified that Antonio LeGrier told him after the shooting, “You did what you had to do.”

The father denied Thursday that he said that.

Antonio LeGrier’s testimony, though, was similar to Rialmo’s in one way — both testified of the damage the shooting had done to their lives. While Rialmo told jurors he’d gained about 50 pounds and struggled to put the incident out of his mind, the father said he moved from the home where the shooting happened and never went back. He said he doesn’t go out much anymore.

“Everything has just changed,” he said.

The father also testified that he was held at a police station after the shooting for seven to eight hours and not allowed to leave.

But an attorney for the city, Andrew Hale, sought to focus jurors’ attention on the domestic incident that preceded the shooting.

LeGrier testified he wedged a board between his bedroom door and his bed to keep his son from coming into his room while he slept that night, though he gave no detailed explanation of why he was concerned.

LeGrier said he woke from a dead sleep around 4 a.m. to a banging sound, followed by the noise of a bat being tapped against his door.

Questioning LeGrier about the tapping noise, Hale pounded the bat against a table a few feet from the jury.

Hale played LeGrier’s call to 911. He was audibly short of breath as he said his son was trying to break into his bedroom.

The father acknowledged on the stand that he was afraid.

LeGrier also testified he heard his son say, “No one’s gonna push me around anymore.”

Jurors have received limited information about Quintonio LeGrier’s conduct beyond the incident, but records show he had behaved erratically as a student at Northern Illinois University and had run-ins with police and peers.

Hale emphasized during questioning that Quintonio LeGrier had lived with a guardian for much of his life, from the ages of 5 to 18.

The first days of the trial focused largely on two questions: how far the teen stood from Rialmo when the officer opened fire and whether he swung the bat as Rialmo said he did. Attorneys for the LeGrier family called a forensic expert who testified the officer was at least 10 feet from the teen when he fired.

A pathologist testified that most of the five bullets that hit the teen went in through his back. She also said medical and other evidence contradicted the officer’s contention that LeGrier raised the bat before he was shot.

Attorneys for the city and Rialmo have tried to cast doubt on the credibility of the medical and physical evidence discussed by the experts hired by the LeGrier family. On Wednesday, Rialmo demonstrated LeGrier’s alleged bat swing and said he felt he was in danger of serious harm or death

Controversy over the shooting has been heightened because it took place just a month after a judge forced Mayor Rahm Emanuel to release footage of a white officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times.

The city’s police disciplinary agency, the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, ruled the shooting unjustified and recommended that Rialmo be fired, but police Superintendent Eddie Johnson determined that deadly force was warranted. The Emanuel-appointed Chicago Police Board will decide whether to fire Rialmo.

Rialmo, who is on paid desk duty, also remains under investigation for a December 2017 bar fight in which he punched two men in the face in an altercation caught on security video. His lawyer, Joel Brodsky, has said Rialmo was defending himself.
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...r-robert-rialmo-testimony-20180620-story.html

Chicago cop re-enacts how he alleges teen swung bat at him in moments before fatal shooting

Chicago police Officer Robert Rialmo stepped in front of a jury Wednesday and sliced the air with an aluminum baseball bat, re-enacting his account of 19-year-old Quintonio LeGrier’s actions before the officer fatally shot him in 2015.

The officer’s multiple demonstrations of the alleged bat swing came as he testified for a second day in the high-profile trial over lawsuits stemming from LeGrier’s shooting.

“I thought he was gonna try to take my head off with it,” Rialmo told a Cook County jury.

The trial at the Daley Center courthouse has focused on how far the teenager stood from Rialmo when the officer opened fire and whether LeGrier swung the bat at the officer as he and his partner responded to a domestic incident early the morning after Christmas Day 2015. Rialmo also accidentally struck and killed 55-year-old bystander Bettie Jones.

The bat has been a key prop for lawyers from both sides. Under questioning by Brian Gainer, a lawyer for the city, Rialmo cocked the 28-inch bat back in a stance suggesting a batter awaiting a pitch and swung downward.

Rialmo’s questioning by lawyers defending the shooting followed testimony Tuesday from a pathologist hired by the LeGrier family who said that his wounds showed that most of the five bullets that hit the teen went in through his back. She also testified that Rialmo’s account of LeGrier raising the bat before his shooting did not match the medical and physical evidence. A forensics expert, meanwhile, testified that LeGrier was at least 10 feet from Rialmo when the officer fired.

In another demonstration with his lawyer, Joel Brodsky, Rialmo and the attorney stood roughly 5 feet from one another and re-enacted the swing.

Later in a full day of testimony for the officer, Brodsky’s questions prompted Rialmo to testify that he had told an officer who arrived on the scene after the shooting that he’d “f----- up.”

Rialmo testified that he “didn’t f--- up with Quintonio. I f----- up with Bettie.”

The city’s lawyers reached a proposed $16 million settlement with her family.

The shooting has been controversial, in part because it took place just a month after a judge forced Mayor Rahm Emanuel to release footage of a white officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times.

The city’s new police disciplinary agency, the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, ruled the shooting unjustified and recommended that Rialmo be fired, but police Superintendent Eddie Johnson determined that deadly force was warranted. The Emanuel-appointed Chicago Police Board will decide whether to fire Rialmo.

Rialmo, who is on paid desk duty, also remains under investigation for a December 2017 bar fight in which he punched two men in the face in an altercation caught on security video. Brodsky has said Rialmo was defending himself.

Earlier on Wednesday, attorney Basileios Foutris, who represents the LeGrier family, asked Rialmo confrontational questions and repeatedly tried to highlight alleged inconsistencies in his accounts of the shooting.

Chicago police fatally shot Quintonio LeGrier, 19, and Bettie Jones, 55, as officers responded to a domestic disturbance at a West Garfield Park residence Dec. 26, 2015, authorities said.

Rialmo told jurors that LeGrier swung the bat while on the porch, but Foutris played a prior recorded statement in which Rialmo said the teen was in the threshold.

The officer has given conflicting statements as to his location when he fired. But on Wednesday he told jurors he was on the walkway between the porch and the sidewalk when he fired and that he backpedaled as he shot. LeGrier and Jones were found in the vestibule.

As Foutris questioned him about text messages Rialmo received from a friend making plans the night after the shooting, the officer reacted with annoyance.

“Is it strange to you I have friends that want to check on me?” he asked.

Lawyers also led the officer through personal details, including his graduation from Lane Technical College Prep High School and his service in the Marines. Since the shooting, Rialmo — in a shirt and tie with his dark hair slicked back — testified that he’d gained 50 pounds and consistently played the night over in his head, among other consequences.

The shooting has been divisive since it transpired, and Wednesday was marked by a brief disruption as the trial wrapped up for the day. As Rialmo left the stand and went into a conference room where he had spent time while not on the stand, he passed close to LeGrier’s father, Antonio, and appeared to say something as he entered the room. LeGrier, visibly distressed, talked with Foutris, who said Rialmo had threatened his client. Sheriff’s deputies briefly kept the parties in court to discuss the matter before Foutris and LeGrier left without commenting.

Brodsky told reporters afterward that Rialmo had simply muttered something to himself after a difficult day on the stand.
 
https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/c...-quintonio-legrier-injured-him-it-changed-me/

Rialmo: Dad said ‘You did what you needed to do,’ after shooting

Chicago Police officer Robert Rialmo testified Tuesday that after he shot a bat-wielding Quintonio LeGrier, LeGrier’s father repeatedly told him, “You did what you needed to do.”

That statement from Antonio LeGrier, Rialmo said, came after the officer asked him, “Dad, what the f—?”

Rialmo’s recollection of what Antonio LeGrier said the night his son was killed came during the third day of trial in the wrongful death suit brought against Rialmo and the city by the LeGrier estate. Rialmo is also suing the city and the LeGrier estate.

The officer, who testified for 6 ½ hours Wednesday, also said that after he fired the seven shots at LeGrier — one of which fatally struck Bettie Jones, the LeGriers’ downstairs neighbor — he walked across the street to collect himself.

Once there, officer Hodges Smith, who responded to the scene, approached Rialmo. It was then, Rialmo said, that he told Smith that he “f—– up.”

“I didn’t f— up with Quintonio,” Rialmo testified. “I f—– up with Bettie.”

Rialmo said he still thinks about Jones’ death every day.

“That’s like the worst thing I’ve ever seen, to tell you the truth,” Rialmo said, adding that Jones “was never a threat to me.”

Rialmo testified that, after coming “rumbling” down the stairs from their second floor apartment, LeGrier took a swing at Rialmo with the bat, coming within inches of striking him.

While being questioned by his attorney, Joel Brodsky, Rialmo demonstrated the stance taken by LeGrier when he had the 23-inch, 23-oz. aluminum baseball bat in the moments before he was shot. He raised the bat over his right shoulder, with it parallel to the ground.

“I thought he was going to try to take my head off with it,” Rialmo said.

After he swung and cocked the bat back to swing again, Rialmo opened fire, the officer testified. Rialmo said the shooting occurred when LeGrier was on the front porch of the two-flat in the 4700 block of West Erie.

LeGrier’s and Jones’ bodies were both found inside the home, with LeGrier’s partially in the vestibule and partially inside Jones’ first-floor home.

Rialmo testified Wednesday that after he shot LeGrier, the 19-year-old clutched his chest, turned to his right, said “Oh, f—” and returned to the vestibule, where he collapsed.

On Tuesday, Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist, testified that one of the bullets struck and partially severed LeGrier’s spinal cord, which would have paralyzed him immediately and made it impossible for him to walk to the vestibule after he was shot.

Rialmo also testified Wednesday that he was indeed injured after the fatal shooting, departing from what he had previously said.

One of the attorneys for LeGrier’s estate, Basileios “Bill” Foutris, asked Rialmo about any injuries he sustained as a result of the shooting.

In a previous deposition, Rialmo had said he was uninjured.

On Wednesday, Foutris asked him, “Did you sustain any injuries?”

Rialmo replied, “Yes. It changed me.”


Brian Gainer, an attorney for the city, objected to the line of questioning by Foutris and his attempt to show contrast in testimony, calling it, “completely misleading.”

Cross-examination and redirect of Rialmo concluded Wednesday and he likely will not be called to testify again.

After the jury was dismissed around 5 p.m., Rialmo walked into the courtroom’s conference room. Antonio LeGrier has sat near the door to the conference room throughout the trial. As Rialmo walked in, he said something to Antonio LeGrier, who shook his head left to right and raised his hands to chest level.

Asked what Rialmo said to him, Antonio LeGrier said, “I can’t talk about it.”

Reporters from the Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Tribune witnessed the brief exchange and were later asked what happened by Cook County sheriff’s officers.

In the early hours of Dec. 26, 2015, Rialmo and his partner Anthony LaPalermo were responding to a call of a domestic disturbance at the LeGrier home in the 4700 block of West Erie.

Bettie Jones, the LeGrier’s 55-year-old downstairs neighbor, answered the door for Rialmo and his partner. LeGrier came down the stairs with an aluminum baseball bat — which has been used repeatedly as a prop in the trial — and Rialmo opened fire shortly after. LeGrier and Jones were both killed.

At issue in the wrongful death suit is how close LeGrier was to Rialmo when the officer opened fire and whether or not he was swinging the bat at him when he was shot.

Melinek also testified that, given the wound path of one of the shots that struck LeGrier, he could not have been holding the bat above his head when Rialmo shot him, as the officer had previously stated.
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ier-police-shooting-trial-20180622-story.html

Chicago cop justified in shooting bat-wielding teen, use of force expert testifies

A police shooting expert testified Friday that Chicago police Officer Robert Rialmo was justified in shooting Quintonio LeGrier even if the 19-year-old didn’t swing the baseball bat he held, saying he posed a potentially deadly threat.

Emanuel Kapelsohn, an expert on police training and firearms hired by the city, also said that “less lethal” weapons such as a Taser shock device or pepper spray might not have been effective.

“People are killed with baseball bats every year,” he told jurors on the fifth day of a trial over lawsuits stemming from the divisive 2015 shooting that also killed 55-year-old bystander Bettie Jones. Earlier this month, the city tentatively settled a lawsuit filed by Jones’ family for $16 million.

During a sometimes testy cross-examination by a lawyer for the LeGrier family, Kapelsohn acknowledged that the summary of the shooting he gave jurors depended in part on Rialmo’s version of the incident. The officer’s accounts of the shooting have varied.

The trial over the LeGrier family’s lawsuit has turned largely on two key topics: whether LeGrier swung the bat at Rialmo as the officer testified, and the distance that separated the two when Rialmo fired. The shooting happened as Rialmo and his partner responded to a domestic disturbance early the morning after Christmas 2015. When LeGrier approached them with an aluminum baseball bat, Rialmo fired, hitting him five times.

Kapelsohn’s testimony stood in contrast to the statements of forensic and medical experts hired by the LeGrier family. A forensic expert testified earlier this week that LeGrier was at least 10 feet from the cop at the time of the shooting, while a pathologist said the teen’s wounds and other evidence contradicted Rialmo’s account of LeGrier raising the bat before he was shot. The pathologist also said that most of the bullets went in through the teen’s back.

On Wednesday, Rialmo demonstrated for jurors how he said LeGrier swung the bat downward at him.

But Kapelsohn said LeGrier would not have had to swing the bat for Rialmo to reasonably believe he faced an immediate lethal threat.

Rialmo has given varying accounts of both his position and LeGrier’s before the shooting, but Kapelsohn noted the differing scenarios and said Rialmo was “within a very dangerous zone.”

The expert also testified that he test-fired Rialmo’s 9 mm semi-automatic pistol and found he could fire seven rounds in just over a second, illustrating for jurors how quickly the incident might have unfolded. Rialmo fired seven or eight shots at LeGrier.

On cross-examination, Basileios Foutris, an attorney for the LeGrier family, highlighted the officer’s inconsistent accounts. He noted, for example, that a detective who talked to Rialmo shortly after the shooting said the officer didn’t mention the bat swing.

“If the officers are not accurately describing what happened, the shooting might not have been appropriate,” Kapelsohn acknowledged.

Foutris also tried to dent the expert’s credibility by pointing out that he usually testifies for defendants, not plaintiffs, and that he expected to make more than $33,000 for his work on the case. He also questioned Kapelsohn about his ownership of 50 to 100 guns.

Kapelsohn is a well-known expert who has been involved in multiple cases stemming from high-profile police shootings. Last year, he testified that a Minnesota officer’s account of events indicated he was justified in shooting Philando Castile, according to news clippings. Castile’s recorded fatal shooting during a traffic stop — which came after Castile warned the officer he had a gun — sparked outrage and led to manslaughter charges against the officer. The cop, who said he believed Castile was pulling his gun, was acquitted.

The LeGrier family’s lawyers are expected to continue presenting their case Monday. The city’s lawyers were allowed to call Kapelsohn before the plaintiffs finished their case because of a scheduling conflict.

The clash of experts in the LeGrier shooting mirrors the rift between police Superintendent Eddie Johnson and the city’s officer disciplinary agency, the Civilian Office of Police Accountability. COPA ruled the shooting unjustified and recommended the officer be fired. Johnson disagreed and ruled the shooting was warranted.

The case has been politically heated since it took place just a month after Mayor Rahm Emanuel was forced by a judge to release video of an officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times.

Rialmo, who is on paid desk duty, also remains under investigation for a December 2017 bar fight in which he punched two men in the face in an altercation caught on security video. His lawyer, Joel Brodsky, has said Rialmo was defending himself.
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ier-police-shooting-trial-20180628-story.html

Conflicting verdict favors Chicago cop in fatal shooting as trial ends in confusion


In a chaotic finish to a high-profile trial, a judge first announced that a jury had found that a Chicago police officer unjustifiably shot and killed a bat-wielding teen, then wiped away the verdict and the $1 million award to the teen’s family after noting that jurors had also found the officer reasonably feared for his life when he fired.

Confusion abounded at the Daley Center courthouse Wednesday evening after the Cook County jury reached its verdict after 3 ½ hours of deliberations, capping an eight-day trial.

Judge Rena Marie Van Tine first announced that jurors had sided in favor of Quintonio LeGrier's parents — who sued the city and Officer Robert Rialmo — awarding them $1.05 million in damages.

Moments later, however, it was revealed that jurors had also signed a special interrogatory — a specific question to a jury — finding that Rialmo fired in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm, a decision that cut against the verdict.

Van Tine then found that the specific question overrode the rest of the verdict. Over the objections of the LeGrier family’s, the judge found in favor of Rialmo and the city.

The jury foreman later answered reporters’ question, suggesting he had expected the $1.05 million in damages to be imposed.

The wild ending marked the culmination of 2 1/2 years of legal wrangling over one of the most divisive shootings in the recent history of a Police Department still undergoing reforms aimed at preventing controversial uses of force.

The shooting on the West Side also killed 55-year-old Bettie Jones, an innocent bystander, but the city avoided a trial with her family by recently reaching a proposed settlement of $16 million.

In an unusual twist, Rialmo had also sued LeGrier's estate, blaming him for the shooting. Jurors found in Rialmo’s favor but awarded the officer no money.

LeGrier's shooting unfolded as Rialmo and his partner responded about 4:30 a.m. Dec. 26, 2015, to a domestic disturbance at an apartment in the 4700 block of West Erie Street where the teen was staying with his father. LeGrier apparently was plagued by mental health problems and had encounters with police while attending Northern Illinois University, records show.

The shooting has been politically explosive since it transpired just a month after Mayor Rahm Emanuel was forced by a judge to release video of an officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times. The video’s release led to a political firestorm that illuminated long-standing problems in a Police Department with a record of abuse and misconduct.

During closing arguments earlier Wednesday, attorney Basileios Foutris, who represents the LeGrier family, emphasized the portions of the trial that suggested Rialmo — who has given varying statements about the shooting — stood 10 feet or more from the teen when he fired.

The lawyer argued that the officer's statements placing him a few feet from LeGrier were concocted to justify a bad shooting.

Like a mantra, Foutris repeated, “Distance matters.”

“Quintonio was not a threat to him, period,” Foutris said.

Foutris asked jurors to award the LeGrier family as much as about $25 million.

Defending the city, private attorney Brian Gainer, contended that mere seconds passed as the officers — responding to calls of a domestic disturbance — reached the building's front entry and LeGrier bounded down the stairs and rushed at Rialmo and his partner with the bat in his hand. LeGrier presented an immediate lethal threat, Gainer said, whether he was 5 feet or more than 20 feet from Rialmo when he fired.

“It happened like this,” said Gainer, snapping his fingers. “There is no ‘pause’ button.”

Gainer argued that the discrepancies within the officers’ accounts of the shooting actually show their credibility. If the officers conspired to cook up a story, Gainer said, “This is, without a doubt, the worst conspiracy in the history of conspiracies.”

Rialmo made the unconventional move of hiring his own attorney, Joel Brodsky, to represent him alongside the lawyers for the city. Brodsky asked jurors to consider whether they expect cops to run into danger or away from it. He also contended that LeGrier “wanted to be killed by police.”

The shooting has been politically divisive since it transpired just a month after Mayor Rahm Emanuel was forced by a judge to release video of an officer shooting black teen Laquan McDonald 16 times. The video’s release led to a political firestorm that illuminated long-standing problems in a Police Department with a record of abuse and misconduct. Reforms are ongoing some 2½ years later.

The trial over the LeGrier family’s lawsuit has turned largely on two key topics: whether the teen swung the bat at Rialmo as the officer testified and the distance that separated the two when Rialmo fired. Attorneys have also repeatedly returned to the fact that most of the bullets came from behind.

Experts hired by the city and the LeGrier family have voiced conflicting views.

A forensics expert called by the LeGrier family testified that the teen stood at least 10 feet from Rialmo at the time of the shooting. A pathologist hired by the LeGrier family said the teen’s wounds and other evidence contradicted Rialmo’s account of the teen raising the bat before he was shot.

The city’s lawyers, however, called a pathologist who said it was possible that LeGrier had the bat raised when he was shot.

Rialmo himself demonstrated for jurors how he said LeGrier swung the bat downward at him. The officer said the teen came within 2 to 3 feet of him.

The city also called a use-of-force expert who testified that Rialmo was justified in firing — even if LeGrier did not swing the bat — because the teen presented an immediate threat.

That clash of expert opinions mirrors the rift between police Superintendent Eddie Johnson and the city’s officer disciplinary agency, the Civilian Office of Police Accountability. COPA ruled the shooting unjustified and recommended the officer be fired, while Johnson disagreed and ruled that the shooting was warranted.

The Chicago Police Board has yet to decide whether Rialmo should be fired.

Rialmo, who is on paid desk duty, also remains under investigation for a December 2017 bar fight in which he punched two men in the face in an altercation caught on security video. Brodsky has said Rialmo was defending himself.

Complicating the trial, Brodsky made the unorthodox move of suing the LeGrier estate, alleging the teen was to blame for the shooting and seeking damages. The jury found in Rialmo’s favor but awarded no damages.

Only a small portion of the trial focused on Brodsky’s lawsuit. In closing arguments, Foutris called the suit “callous” and pointed out for jurors that Rialmo was not in court. Rialmo did not attend most of the trial, while Brodsky was in court intermittently.

“Apparently, (Rialmo) has got better things to do,” Foutris said.

Brodsky argued that the shooting was “traumatic” and “life-changing” for Rialmo.

“(LeGrier) caused Officer Rialmo to have to take his life, and, unfortunately, tragically, the life of Bettie Jones,” Brodsky said.

“It was Quintonio’s fault.”

Smh...
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/28/us/police-shootings-payouts.html

$16 Million vs. $4: In Fatal Police Shootings, Payouts Vary Widely

When a police officer fatally shoots a person, there are usually reasons offered: The officer was afraid for his life. The victim was reaching for his waistband or refused to show his hands. A glint looked like a gun.

But when Robert Rialmo, a Chicago police officer, killed Bettie R. Jones, 55, there were no reasons to give. Officials acknowledged that Ms. Jones had not only been innocent, but had died while trying to help the police.

Ms. Jones was not the only person killed that evening in December 2015 by Officer Rialmo. During the same incident, he fatally shot Quintonio LeGrier, a 19-year-old college student.

Although a city review board found that Officer Rialmo’s actions in both shootings were unjustified, Chicago could hardly have treated the two deaths more differently.

Ms. Jones’s family stands to receive one of the largest settlements ever in a fatal police shooting — $16 million, pending City Council approval.

But Mr. LeGrier’s family did not receive a settlement — in fact, the city briefly tried to sue his estate before backing off. The family sued, and on Wednesday a jury awarded them $1 million, but the judge reversed the decision, awarding nothing.

The difference, say lawyers who have represented families of shooting victims, is that in Ms. Jones’s case the facts are unusually clear cut, while in Mr. LeGrier’s, they are more in line with typical police shootings: murky, complex and disputed.

In such cases, much depends on the word of the officer, who is usually given the benefit of the doubt. Much depends on whether the officer is deemed to have been reasonably afraid, whether or not there was an actual threat.

The police say Mr. LeGrier had been charging at them with an aluminum baseball bat. His family says he may have been in the midst of a mental health crisis. Officers were responding to a 911 call from Mr. LeGrier’s father, who said he feared his son was going to harm him. Ms. Jones opened her door to direct the police to the LeGriers’ apartment upstairs. Accounts suggest that the police retreated, Mr. LeGrier came down the stairs, and he was near Ms. Jones’s apartment door when Officer Rialmo began to fire.

Although the review board said the LeGrier shooting violated department policy, Eddie Johnson, Chicago’s police superintendent, determined it to be within use-of-force guidelines.

On Wednesday night, the jury found that Officer Rialmo had reasonably feared for his life when he killed Mr. LeGrier, but still awarded $1 million before the judge voided it. Officer Rialmo remains on desk duty while a police panel determines his future.

The LeGrier lawsuit followed a pattern: The vast majority of families who lose someone in a questionable police shooting get nothing — many cases are dismissed before trial. In one recent case, a Florida jury awarded $4 to the family of a man who was killed when the police fired through his closed garage door after a dispute in which they said he was holding a gun.

In the LeGrier case, the city opted to take its chances at trial. Settlement offers, like the one in the Jones case, come when those chances are not good for a variety of reasons, including the culpability of the officer, the degree of sympathy for the victim, the amount of publicity surrounding the death and whether the episode was captured on video.

But there was another possible factor: the fact that the shooting took place in Chicago, said Robert Bennett, a civil rights lawyer who has represented the families in police shootings. In more conservative areas of the nation, where support for the police is typically robust, jury members can be loath to approve large government payouts to victims, Mr. Bennett said.

But in diverse, liberal Chicago, police-community tensions remain high after a series of questionable police shootings. And jury awards in Chicago can be large — last year a man was awarded $44.7 million after his friend, a Chicago police officer, shot him in the head after drinking heavily.

Below is a list of settlement amounts in other high-profile police shootings. In all of these cases, the person who died was black.

Settlement: $18 million
LaTanya Haggerty, Chicago, 1999

Ms. Haggerty, a 26-year-old computer analyst, was a passenger in a car that fled a police traffic stop and was chased for 31 blocks. Her family received what is still believed to be the highest settlement in a fatal police shooting.

The officer who fired the fatal shot, Serena Daniels, said she mistook a cellphone Ms. Haggerty was holding for a gun. Officer Daniels and two other officers involved were fired after officials said they had ignored orders and fired without justification, but they were not prosecuted.

Settlement: $3.25 million
Sean Bell, New York, 2006

Sean Bell, 23, was fatally shot by the police on what would have been his wedding day. Five police officers fired a total of 50 shots into the car Mr. Bell was driving. The police said they believed, wrongly, that someone in the car had a gun because they had heard Mr. Bell’s acquaintances discussing a firearm while leaving his bachelor party, which took place at a club that was under investigation. The total settlement was $7.15 million; about $3.9 million went to two passengers who were wounded. Three of the officers were acquitted of manslaughter; the other two did not face criminal charges.

Settlement: $6.5 million
Walter L. Scott, North Charleston, S.C., 2015

Mr. Scott was stopped for a broken taillight and fled on foot, possibly because he feared arrest for failure to pay child support. A video appeared to show the officer, Michael T. Slager, shooting Mr. Scott in the back as he was running away. Mr. Slager was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Settlement: $6 million
Tamir Rice, Cleveland, 2014

Tamir Rice, 12, was carrying a replica handgun in a public park when an onlooker reported him to 911. Within two seconds of his arrival in a police cruiser, Officer Timothy Loehmann had shot the boy, later saying he feared for his life. The pellet gun was missing the orange safety tip that indicated it was a toy. The 911 caller had said the gun was “probably fake,” but that information was not relayed to the officers. A grand jury declined to indict Officer Loehmann, who was later fired for lying on his police application.

Settlement: $5 million
Laquan McDonald, Chicago, 2014

Laquan McDonald, 17, was killed by a Chicago police officer as he was walking away from officers. He was armed with a knife that he had refused to drop. The officer, Jason Van Dyke, shot Mr. McDonald 16 times. Officer Van Dyke is facing charges of murder and aggravated battery.

Settlement: $3 million
Philando Castile, Falcon Heights, Minn., 2016

During a traffic stop for a broken taillight, Mr. Castile told the officer, Jeronimo Yanez of the St. Anthony Police Department, that he had a gun in the car (he was licensed to carry it). The officer told him not to reach for it, but then fired, later saying he thought that Mr. Castile was disobeying his order. The aftermath of the shooting was streamed live on Facebook by a passenger, Mr. Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, whose young daughter was in the back seat. Officer Yanez was acquitted of manslaughter charges but left the police department.

Settlement: $3 million
Amadou Diallo, New York, 1999

Mr. Diallo, a 22-year-old immigrant from Guinea, was killed by four plainclothes officers who fired a total of 41 bullets, 19 of which struck Mr. Diallo. Officers said they believed Mr. Diallo had a gun. He was unarmed.

The officers, who were on patrol, said Mr. Diallo fit the description of a serial rapist. They said they mistook a wallet Mr. Diallo was holding for a gun. The officers were tried for second-degree murder and acquitted.

Settlement: $2.8 million
Oscar Grant, Oakland, Calif., 2009

Officers of the Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Department were responding to reports of a fight when they ordered Mr. Grant, 22, to lie down on a subway platform. It is not clear whether he was involved in the fight. Though he complied with the order, one of the officers, Johannes Mehserle, shot Mr. Grant — who was unarmed — in the back. The officer said he thought Mr. Grant was reaching for a gun. Officer Mehserle was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and served 11 months in jail. The shooting was the basis for a film, “Fruitvale Station.”

Settlement: $1.5 million
Michael Brown, Ferguson, Mo., 2014

Mr. Brown, 18, was fatally shot by Darren Wilson, a police officer who confronted him for walking in the street. The officer said Mr. Brown attacked him. The authorities found Mr. Brown’s DNA inside the driver’s door of the police vehicle, and on Officer Wilson’s clothes and weapon. The shooting sparked protests across the country and unrest in Ferguson, but several investigations ended with no charges filed against Officer Wilson, who resigned.
 
Back
Top