Welcome To aBlackWeb

2pac, 50 Cent and More Masters Destroyed In Fire

Goldie

Kobe With The Pivot
Site Owner
The fire is being called "the biggest disaster in the history of the music business."
Over a decade ago, there was a devastating fire at Universal Studios in Hollywood. Flames started to burn down parts of Building 6197, which was known as the video vault, during the early hours of June 1, 2008. If you're familiar with the situation, you know that plenty of film reels and videos were destroyed because of the flames. However, a new article by the New York Times Magazine is reporting that approximately 500,000 song titles were also irreparable because of the damages. That information had never been disclosed until now, where legendary artists like Tupac Shakur, Eminem, Aretha Franklin, Ray Charles, Snoop Dogg, and more are all affected.

2008umgfire.jpg

David McNew/Getty Images

Universal had originally only said that the King Kong attraction and a video vault were burnt down but it turns out that they were hiding the fact that tons of master recordings also perished in the fire. In a confidential report by UMG in 2009, the company admitted that around half a million song titles were lost as well.

Of the artists that lost masters in the fire are Aretha Franklin, whose first recorded appearances are gone forever, Buddy Holly, who lost nearly his entire catalog, and Etta James, who lost her hit single "At Last." There are several hip-hop stars that lost music in the fire too including Eminem, Snoop Dogg, 50 Cent, The Roots, Tupac Shakur, and others.

The article notes that the fire was the "biggest disaster in the history of the music business," which sounds accurate. Losing 500,000 masters is a big deal.

2008umgfire1.jpg
 
can you explain what this means tho?

there's songs out there that dont have master recordings....

does this mean they cant be sold or what?
A master recording is the first recording of a song or other sound, from which all the later copies are made. Master recordings (usually called just "masters") can be made on discs, tapes, and computer data storage formats. A multitrack master is an original multitrack recording, which may be worked on over time.
 
right, I get what the master itself is

so what if they lose the original hard copies tho?

there's tons of copies of this music already made....not to mention being available digitally

is it just the historical value thats lost?

im assuming that since Universal had them, the artists effected didnt own them.....so no harm done to them right?
 
right, I get what the master itself is

so what if they lose the original hard copies tho?

there's tons of copies of this music already made....not to mention being available digitally

is it just the historical value thats lost?

im assuming that since Universal had them, the artists effected didnt own them.....so no harm done to them right?
think of it as a first take...the only version..yes it can be duplicated but never replicated..not even by said artist
 
Jz can't master reasonable doubt ever again...his voice, pitch and tone is all different from 1994/5
 
What are master recordings, and why do they matter?
A master recording is the one-of-a-kind original recording of a piece of music. It’s the source from which other vinyl records, CDs, MP3s and all other recordings are made.

“A master is the truest capture of a piece of recorded music,” Adam Block, the former president of Legacy Recordings, Sony Music Entertainment’s catalog arm, told the magazine. “Sonically, masters can be stunning in their capturing of an event in time. Every copy thereafter is a sonic step away.”
 
Generally speaking, before digital (e.g. Aretha Franklin era) music was recorded on a 24 track, 2" tape. The kick drum would be on one track, the snare drum on another track, the hi hats on another track, the baseline on another track, the guitar on another track, the horns on another track and of course, the vocals would be on a track by themselves with the background vocals on yet another track.

rc7boruvoat5i5h9scgw.jpg




From reading that article, I gather that the original reel to reel tapes are gone. So we can still listen to the music because it's been mass produced. But we'll never be able to go back to those Aretha Franklin tapes and remix them, or remaster them.

Another way to look at it is we'll never be able to get the vocals from an old Aretha Franklin song and put a different beat underneath it.
 
Back
Top