Amazon Canary Black
- Thread starter Infamous114
- Start date
Added to Calendar: 10-24-24
KNiGHTS
Active Member
What in the DC "We're copying but not" fuck shit naming convention...
Now streaming
VulcanRaven
Active Member
Same. Kate can still get the DWatching
a.mann
Active Member
Elzo69Renaissance
Niggas online ratting then calling it content
Shit was awful
Loneshot
Active Member
How do obviously bad films/shows get made? Is it super rich people that can afford to throw away money on projects or does the idea sound good and it's executed bad? For years I have been wondering how expensive projects that turn out bad get green lit so often.
Edit: I just asked chatGPT and the international market makes the most sense. Along with executives adding their input on how the show is produced.
Edit: I just asked chatGPT and the international market makes the most sense. Along with executives adding their input on how the show is produced.
Even when films or TV shows seem "obviously bad," there are several reasons they still get funded:
1. Commercial Potential Over Quality: Studios often prioritize what they think will sell over artistic merit. If a concept has a built-in fan base (like a franchise or reboot), or if it’s a genre that traditionally performs well (e.g., action or horror), it may get funded regardless of quality because it has a higher chance of making a quick profit.
2. Star Power and Established Names: Projects with big-name actors, directors, or producers attached can attract funding more easily. Sometimes, this means that even if a script is mediocre, it’s expected that the big names will draw audiences, ensuring at least a baseline return.
3. International and Streaming Appeal: Many movies and shows, particularly action films and simple comedies, do well internationally even if they don’t succeed in the U.S. market. Additionally, streaming platforms need large volumes of content, so they sometimes fund lower-quality projects to bulk up their libraries.
4. Tax Incentives and Subsidies: Some films are made primarily because they qualify for tax breaks or subsidies in certain regions. These incentives can offset production costs, making it financially worthwhile even if the project itself isn’t expected to perform well.
5. Franchise Building: Studios may fund weaker projects to expand a franchise universe or test audience interest in potential spin-offs. The idea is to set up future projects that, if successful, could be more lucrative.
6. Production Companies' Obligations: Sometimes, a production company has contracts that require a certain number of films or shows to be produced within a timeframe. This pressure can lead to a focus on speed and quantity rather than quality.
7. Mismatch Between Creative and Financial Goals: Executives or financiers often have different priorities than writers, directors, and audiences. Projects may go forward because they meet financial goals, even if they lack creative vision.
Despite these factors, sometimes a poorly received film or show unexpectedly finds its audience later on, or even turns into a "so bad it's good" cult favorite.
1. Commercial Potential Over Quality: Studios often prioritize what they think will sell over artistic merit. If a concept has a built-in fan base (like a franchise or reboot), or if it’s a genre that traditionally performs well (e.g., action or horror), it may get funded regardless of quality because it has a higher chance of making a quick profit.
2. Star Power and Established Names: Projects with big-name actors, directors, or producers attached can attract funding more easily. Sometimes, this means that even if a script is mediocre, it’s expected that the big names will draw audiences, ensuring at least a baseline return.
3. International and Streaming Appeal: Many movies and shows, particularly action films and simple comedies, do well internationally even if they don’t succeed in the U.S. market. Additionally, streaming platforms need large volumes of content, so they sometimes fund lower-quality projects to bulk up their libraries.
4. Tax Incentives and Subsidies: Some films are made primarily because they qualify for tax breaks or subsidies in certain regions. These incentives can offset production costs, making it financially worthwhile even if the project itself isn’t expected to perform well.
5. Franchise Building: Studios may fund weaker projects to expand a franchise universe or test audience interest in potential spin-offs. The idea is to set up future projects that, if successful, could be more lucrative.
6. Production Companies' Obligations: Sometimes, a production company has contracts that require a certain number of films or shows to be produced within a timeframe. This pressure can lead to a focus on speed and quantity rather than quality.
7. Mismatch Between Creative and Financial Goals: Executives or financiers often have different priorities than writers, directors, and audiences. Projects may go forward because they meet financial goals, even if they lack creative vision.
Despite these factors, sometimes a poorly received film or show unexpectedly finds its audience later on, or even turns into a "so bad it's good" cult favorite.