OPINION Contradictions and Lies! Exposing the Democratic Party

SneakDZA said:
I'm not sure why you guys are playing along with this conversation as if Meg & Quavo were the only celebrity endorsements for Harris. This shit is cherry-picking at it's finest. Also, people pretending like they don't know how celebrity endorsements work all of a sudden are crazy disingenuous.

And don't get me started on the white guy who somehow wants to convince us that the party with outright white supremacists policies is somehow exactly the same as the party where some broad said she had hot sauce in her damn pocket over a decade ago. The irony of talking about people being consistently tone-deaf is not lost on me.
Click to expand...

Also forgetting or intentionally ignoring that the highest percentage of Democrat voters are Black women. Who does Meg appeal to the most? Black women. Some outside that demographic just don't like Meg and Kamala for preconceived reasons so the combo was a double whammy of "fuck these bitches".
 
SeaSnake said:
Racists have one priority
Click to expand...
AP4.0 said:
Hmmm

I think maga didn't just pop up out of thin air. I think maga has always been maga, they just didn't have a name for it and by and large suppressed their feelings and thoughts to largely keep them contained among each other.

I also think the current version of the Democrats thinks the Democrats they grew up with are still the same age and haven't realized those people have only a couple more voting cycles left which is why they think they are still speaking to the same audience as the ones from the Clinton years.
Click to expand...
Eh my theory is one side is empty pandering bc they fail to connect, the other side is actually representing their base constituents.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
6 months to plan would be a halfway viable excuse if we didn't already have "if u don't vote for me u ain't black" and "hot sauce in my bag"

Seems odd that they are consistently tone deaf no matter how much time they have to prepare
Click to expand...


Ok so I see
Knock_Twice said:
If they fight for everybody, then why are we calling them feminist?

Black women and black men need to be fighting for one another brotha.

2 Black women feel this way, I can find 2 black men that feel the same way?

Have you looked into why heterosexual black men suffer in silence? etc etc. I used heterosexual because you inserted "gay men" to say that feminist fight for men in my opinion, you went to the gay men route. You had to say that because feminist don't fight for heterosexual men

We all have problems brotha, but you want to focus it on just black women and "gay men" (that's who you deem as feminist fighting for imo) No brotha. We all are under this white supremacy banner
Click to expand...


Black men gay or straight suffer in silence because they think it’s soft to express feelings and don’t want to get jokes on. We see that all the time and you one of the ones that do that. Ally of stuff we go through can’t Juan’s vented to friends a lot of us need therapy to deal with deeper issues and friends and spouses can’t handle everything. You can tell them about your job but how can they deal with deeper issues. But a lot of us don’t want to do therapy. A lot of us think drinking and dope is a good mask for problems and I know my dad generation did for sure.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Eh my theory is one side is empty pandering bc they fail to connect, the other side is actually representing their base constituents.
Click to expand...


Their base is racist and they want racist policies. The democrat base is completely against that. And yall try to muddy it by saying everything is about trans and immigrants.
 
Knock_Twice said:
If they fight for everybody, then why are we calling them feminist?

Black women and black men need to be fighting for one another brotha.

2 Black women feel this way, I can find 2 black men that feel the same way?

Have you looked into why heterosexual black men suffer in silence? etc etc. I used heterosexual because you inserted "gay men" to say that feminist fight for men in my opinion, you went to the gay men route. You had to say that because feminist don't fight for heterosexual men

We all have problems brotha, but you want to focus it on just black women and "gay men" (that's who you deem as feminist fighting for imo) No brotha. We all are under this white supremacy banner
Click to expand...


Fight for a group that views them as lesser. Look how you view feminists why would they help you? But for instance what if a policy idea they pushed ended up helping your family you gonna throw it away because it was divisive?
 
Knock_Twice said:
If they fight for everybody, then why are we calling them feminist?

Black women and black men need to be fighting for one another brotha.

2 Black women feel this way, I can find 2 black men that feel the same way?

Have you looked into why heterosexual black men suffer in silence? etc etc. I used heterosexual because you inserted "gay men" to say that feminist fight for men in my opinion, you went to the gay men route. You had to say that because feminist don't fight for heterosexual men

We all have problems brotha, but you want to focus it on just black women and "gay men" (that's who you deem as feminist fighting for imo) No brotha. We all are under this white supremacy banner
Click to expand...

Why you view gay black people as separate from
Straight in a negative way? You’ve stated before you wish they wouldn’t be seen like that and I don’t get it. They exist and they are black why you view them as an opp?
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Did u quote the right person? Only asking bc u typed "y'all"
Click to expand...

Well folks often times say the parties are the same because of the corporate stuff or Israel support.

Democrats do not believe in cutting snap benefits, they not trying to spend money deporting all these non white people, tariffs, gun control etc

It’s not all smoke and mirrors and bread and circuses. We have valid reasons not to ever ride with Republicans
 
Last edited:
SeaSnake said:
Well folks often times say the parties are the same because of the corporate stuff or Israel support.

Democrats do not believe in cutting snap benefits, they not trying to spend money deporting all these non white people, tariffs, gun control etc

It’s not all smoke and mirrors and bread and circuses. We have valid reasons not to ever ride with Republicans
Click to expand...
No matter who's in office the middle class shrinks, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and more people need government assistance.

When I say both sides are the same I don't mean their policies align 100%, thats obvious. What I mean is both their incentives are based around a structure that supports us all being worse off, one side just does more damage in a shorter amount of time than the other.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
No matter who's in office the middle class shrinks, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and more people need government assistance.

When I say both sides are the same I don't mean their policies align 100%, thats obvious. What I mean is both their incentives are based around a structure that supports us all being worse off, one side just does more damage in a shorter amount of time than the other.
Click to expand...

At the bold it's actually not. Which is why when people often bring up the issues of racial implications of policies and actions and who gets affected the most by things and question when you use the "both sides are the same" as an attempt to dissect them it often rings hollow.
 
BlackRain said:
At the bold it's actually not. Which is why when people often bring up the issues of racial implications of policies and actions and who gets affected the most by things and question when you use the "both sides are the same" as an attempt to dissect them it often rings hollow.
Click to expand...
U are generalizing. I know it's obvious and u know it's obvious there are differences. I'm speaking my opinions not someone else's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top