COMMUNITY United States Politics Thread: Trump's Second Term



IMG_3299.gif
 

12 States Sue Trump Over His Tariffs​

A dozen states, most of them led by Democrats, sued President Trump over his tariffs on Wednesday, arguing that he has no power to “arbitrarily impose tariffs as he has done here.”

Contending that only Congress has the power to legislate tariffs, the states are asking the court to block the Trump administration from enforcing what they said were unlawful tariffs.

“These edicts reflect a national trade policy that now hinges on the president’s whims rather than the sound exercise of his lawful authority,” said the lawsuit, filed by the states’ attorneys general in the U.S. Court of International Trade.

The states, including New York, Illinois and Oregon, are the latest parties to take the Trump administration to court over the tariffs. Their case comes after California filed its own lawsuit last week, in which Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state attorney general accused the administration of escalating a trade war that has caused “immediate and irreparable harm” to that state’s economy.
 

In a sweeping move that civil rights advocates say could unravel decades of progress toward racial and gender equity, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that seeks to dismantle a key legal tool for combating systemic discrimination: disparate-impact liability.

The order, titled Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, frames itself as a defense of "colorblind" principles, arguing that policies considering race or gender in any way— even unintentionally— undermine meritocracy. But legal experts and activists warn that the directive could gut enforcement of landmark civil rights laws, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by making it nearly impossible to challenge discriminatory practices that disproportionately harm marginalized groups.


At its core, the order takes aim at disparate-impact liability a legal doctrine that allows plaintiffs to challenge policies that are neutral on their face but have a discriminatory effect. For example, if a hiring test disproportionately screens out Black applicants despite being unrelated to job performance, disparate-impact theory allows courts to intervene.


What does Trump’s order actually do?
  • Revokes key civil rights regulations from the 1960s and 1970s that authorized disparate-impact enforcement under Title VI (which bars discrimination in federally funded programs) and Title VII (which covers employment discrimination).
  • Directs federal agencies to deprioritize enforcing civil rights laws that rely on disparate-impact claims, including in housing, lending, and employment.
  • Orders a review of all pending civil rights cases based on disparate impact, signaling an intent to drop or weaken such cases.
  • Encourages challenges to state-level civil rights laws that use disparate-impact standards.

Civil rights groups immediately condemned the move, calling it a rollback of foundational protections.

With a conservative-dominated judiciary, Trump’s order could set the stage for new legal battles— and potentially a Supreme Court showdown.

For now, the order signals a dramatic shift in how discrimination will, or won’t, be policed in America. And for communities of color, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
 

In a sweeping move that civil rights advocates say could unravel decades of progress toward racial and gender equity, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that seeks to dismantle a key legal tool for combating systemic discrimination: disparate-impact liability.

The order, titled Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, frames itself as a defense of "colorblind" principles, arguing that policies considering race or gender in any way— even unintentionally— undermine meritocracy. But legal experts and activists warn that the directive could gut enforcement of landmark civil rights laws, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by making it nearly impossible to challenge discriminatory practices that disproportionately harm marginalized groups.


At its core, the order takes aim at disparate-impact liability a legal doctrine that allows plaintiffs to challenge policies that are neutral on their face but have a discriminatory effect. For example, if a hiring test disproportionately screens out Black applicants despite being unrelated to job performance, disparate-impact theory allows courts to intervene.


What does Trump’s order actually do?
  • Revokes key civil rights regulations from the 1960s and 1970s that authorized disparate-impact enforcement under Title VI (which bars discrimination in federally funded programs) and Title VII (which covers employment discrimination).
  • Directs federal agencies to deprioritize enforcing civil rights laws that rely on disparate-impact claims, including in housing, lending, and employment.
  • Orders a review of all pending civil rights cases based on disparate impact, signaling an intent to drop or weaken such cases.
  • Encourages challenges to state-level civil rights laws that use disparate-impact standards.

Civil rights groups immediately condemned the move, calling it a rollback of foundational protections.

With a conservative-dominated judiciary, Trump’s order could set the stage for new legal battles— and potentially a Supreme Court showdown.

For now, the order signals a dramatic shift in how discrimination will, or won’t, be policed in America. And for communities of color, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
IMG_3299.gif
 
Back
Top