Welcome To aBlackWeb

What Are We Doing With MJ?

Where Do U Stand With MJ?


  • Total voters
    30
Naw let’s stop listening to MJ cuz of Wade Robson lmao nigga plz ...he prolly still listening to MJ
 
Mike guilty as shit,but Mike is music.he did that shit damn near from birth to death

MJ could have buried 17 infants in his backyard and he would still be a musical legend.
 
PeskyHotGalapagossealion-size_restricted.gif
 
The man wasn't having parties and sleepovers with children that age?

Neverland ranch?

Two white surrogate parents?

That's some funny style shit.
oh ok

i see your pov

yes, the optics are HORRIBLE and dude shouldnt have even put himself in that situation...however, as horrible as those optics are, he was found by the FBI to not have done any of the stuff that people are claiming he did.
 
Theres a reddit post somebody made detailing all the ways wade and the other dude story shouldn't be believed. I'll find it later but I havent seen the doc yet and reading that on top of knowing how the doc is produced....I'm rocking with Mike cuz I dont believe he did it. At least not with THESE 2 particular dudes.

The thing is Mike money is crazy long so who knows who got paid to say and overlook what if it actually did happen.
 
Theres a reddit post somebody made detailing all the ways wade and the other dude story shouldn't be believed. I'll find it later but I havent seen the doc yet and reading that on top of knowing how the doc is produced....I'm rocking with Mike cuz I dont believe he did it. At least not with THESE 2 particular dudes.

The thing is Mike money is crazy long so who knows who got paid to say and overlook what if it actually did happen.
Here's the reddit examples of MJ you were talking about from Quora; along with my reasonable doubt that's already been said by others before me. I'm not really big on MJ and he was the King in my day; I just preferred Prince and Terence Trent D'Arby musically, but I'll say there is and was legitimate Jay-Z. REasonable Doubt. I'm not saying guilty or innocent. I'm just laying 11 examples for reasonable doubt:
Reasonable doubt:
#1-FBI did a surprise raid on MJ’s estate and found NOthing (as so many have stated)
#2- 2 trials were conducted against Michael and he was never found guilty
#3-His accuser(Wade), now doing this Leaving Neverland, under oath in his 20s said MJ never did anything sexually against him.
#4- His other accuser (Gavin) and his father accused George Lopez of stealing $300 from his wallet, and one of the Leaving Neverland's accuser's mother also tried to sue JC Penney's claiming someone in JC Penney's raped her son. How many people raped one boy?
#5-Judge threw out Wade’s testimony and added statements that his testimony is filled with inconsistencies and absolute lies and . no jury should have to listen to him. -Wade and other guyGavin now want to sue MJ’s estate.
#6-FBI did a 17 year surveillance on MJ following all his movements and found NOTHING.
#7-Comedian Louise Palanker was solicited constantly for cash by one of MJ's accuser's fathers, and after helping the accuser she discovered the father was trying to profit off the case.
#8-I personally worked the case the for the world’s largest news media organization and saw the entire trial live everyday for my job and how witnesses had nothing on MJ but speculation & yes Tito’s son was correct in the media changing the narrative to help make MJ look guilty-although the court case was doing the opposite (which was the reason MJ at the time had his own tv show on E to show a more accurate representation) -The history of almost every single child predator caught always bears strong evidence. It is a strong sickness that they cannot hide. It shows up in porno, other witnesses seeing molestation; or it shows up in their literature or on 20/20s How to Catch a predator. I've never seen a pedophile go to prison and every official says "we found nothing." There were many purported/alleged reports, but no facts. Before the FBI raided MJ's estate they were already looking at him, tracking his movements, and tapping his calls for a total of 17 years (which means I guess 7 years before he was accused and then the 10 years that included both trials).
#9-Same week MJ died the father of guy who accused MJ of raping his son mysteriously killed himself.
#10-John Ziegler's testimony of what made the accuser change his testimony to accuse MJ and no longer defend him was when MJ's estate in 2016 denied him the right to direct MJ's circus de Sole show when he was being considered. After he was denied he began contradicting his former defense of MJ and began accusing MJ.
#11-Here’s some other woman's Redditt/Quora reasons she found for Reasonable doubt due to Wade and that other guy’s history right before the documentary was made and sent to Sundance: Here's her quotes and findings:
"It's Simple AEG paid him to lie about MJ as soon as MJ's Mom sued them, That same day or right before it All of the sudden Robber(Robson) came out with them egregious lies about MJ and same for UpChuck (Safechuck)

Why did Robbers house sell so quick and he got more then the asking price for it?"
**** A quick timeline of the events the year before the film was made: February 27 – AEG trial to go ahead March 21 – Judge dismisses AEG’s appeal and trial set to go ahead, also the day the judge allowed the allegations to be raised in the trial March 21 – Wade Robson puts his house up for sale for 789K April 29 – contract pending date for Wade’s property April 30 – AEG trial begins April 30 – recording date of the contract for Wade’s property May 1 – Wade Robson files his claim against the MJ estate May 7 – allegations go public May 8 – sells his LA house for $825K, which is $36K more than the asking price. May 10 – Files civil suit May 16 – Goes on national TV {to change his story from saying MJ never did nothing to saying he was raped.}
https://www.quora.com/Michael-Jackson-Why-did-Wade-Robson-accuse-Michael-Jackson-for-molestation

My belief is if MJ did it then he deserved the highest of punishments possible. I do see reasonable doubt in his case due to the absence of facts; thus he very well could have been innocent AND only guilty of being a grown man having abnormal relationships with young boys that were very strange but not illegal
-here's some of the sources. I wrote what I remembered from years ago on here first and then decided to see if I could find some sources today.
https://books.google.com.do/books?id=MSDdAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT162&lpg=PT162&dq=George+Lopez+accused+of+stealing+$300&source=bl&ots=NuVIsBG8qW&sig=ACfU3U0ThcxO4EdCH3r5gwpsrKBf8rVa-g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjSpcLonqzhAhUGn-AKHbnPAXkQ6AEwCXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=George Lopez accused of stealing $300&f=false


 
Last edited:
Back
Top