Breaking News O.J. speaks on 25th anniversary of Nicole Simpson killing. Update: Da Juice has Twitter Lit...
- Thread starter StringerBell
- Start date
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
Disanthrope
Inconvenient truth + Necessary evil
Lol I hate when people play the gotcha game with people's words. You think hes dumb enough to incriminate himself on national TV and not realize it? I don't know what that was but it wasn't a confession
Bottom line, it was a professional hit. They were coke heads in debt. Goldman's coke buddy Brett Cantor was near decapitated a year prior and Michael Nigg was stabbed up a year later.
Those are facts not speculation but the media hid that from you, didn't they?
Bottom line, it was a professional hit. They were coke heads in debt. Goldman's coke buddy Brett Cantor was near decapitated a year prior and Michael Nigg was stabbed up a year later.
Those are facts not speculation but the media hid that from you, didn't they?
Lol that was for the if i did it book he was promoting.
StringerBell
OG
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
The dude tried to write a book about stating how he would have killed them "if" he really killed them. You think someone stupid enough to do something like that wouldn't be stupid enough to make a confession? Hell, did you see the video, did the guy look rational to you.
Bruh here's the whole interview.
Yes, he framed the conversation as a hypothetical, but who would do something like that? If you were being wrongly accused of murdering two people, would you get on TV and give a hypothetical account for how the murder could have gone down. Also, keep in mind that he's not saying it's hypothetical because he didn't do it. He's saying its hypothetical because he may have blacked out while he was doing it. Name an innocent person that's ever done anything like this.
Disanthrope
Inconvenient truth + Necessary evil
Who killed Brett Cantor and Michael Nigg bruh?
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
Did OJ get on TV and offer a hypothetical admission to killing them? If so, yeah he probably did it.
They approached him with the idea to write a book about a hypothetical situation about if he were to commit the murders how he would’ve done it. The interviewer asks him the question and be answered it. Seems pretty disingenuous on your end how you worded it..
Remember who you’re dealing with..
Disanthrope
Inconvenient truth + Necessary evil
So even tho Oj was acquitted, the glove didn't fit, the victims friends were murdered in the same PROFESSIONAL way, LAPD are notorious racist thugs and their lead detective pled the 5th when asked if he planted evidence you still say OJ killed TWO people at once because of media propaganda after the fact???
You on some "slavery was a choice" shit b
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
You didn't watch or skim through the video. The interview specifically says that OJ was the one that wanted to call it hypothetical and that based on their conversation leading up to the interview, he wanted to do that so he could have plausible deniability with his kids. That's her speculation, which is why I didn't bring that up, but you saying that she was asking these questions in the vein of the book is untrue. She was asking him about the incident and going along with the hypothetical bullshit because that's what was required to get the interview. And again, what innocent person would go for writing a book about how they would hypothetically commit murders that they are being falsely accused of. You didn't see the Central Park 5 get out of jail and collaborate on a book about how they would have raped the jogger if they actually did it. No truly innocent person would do something like that.
Why are you acting like any of that shit is proof that OJ didn't do it? Killer cops get acquitted all the time, does that mean they weren't wrong? The LAPD has been racist, does that mean 100% of the criminals they arrested were innocent? Furman planted evidence in the past and didn't want to incriminate himself. Is that evidence that he planted anything in the OJ case? The answer to all those questions is "Fuck No!" Again, if we're arguing about whether or not the verdict of of OJ's trial was right, that's a different matter. I can believe they managed to raise reasonable doubt. However, if you saying that any of that is actual proof for OJ's innocence, you're just wrong. And your last remark about slavery is just stupid and has no place in this discussion at all.
Huh? If he wasn’t there and didn’t do the crime how else would it be besides hypothetical? He did the interview and wrote the book because he was being bled dry due to all the civil suits and continuous lawsuits against him, dude was cash strapped and desperate, OJ was never the smartest guy in the world either.
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
Bruh, here is the interviewer's exact words when asked why she framed the interview as a hypothetical.
He claimed that if it was hypothetical, he could have deniability with the kids. That is what he said, but who would even say this as a hypothetical unless he committed the murders?
You keep drawing this parallel between the interview and the book. This interview was not affiliated with the book, and the interviewer makes it clear that calling it hypothetical was OJ's idea not hers. Again, you can choose not to believe her. That's your choice. We can agree to disagree on this, but I can't see any reasonable explanation for why an innocent person would make up a story about them possibly not being innocent. That makes no sense and saying "OJ needed the money" or "OJ isn't the smartest" are not good reasons because there are plenty of poor and stupid people that would not do something like this unless under actual coercion. Hell, you bring up the civil suits. Do you think that something like this would help his case in that area?
You’re being disingenuous here is the full quote.
"I received a phone call from an attorney who said 'O.J. is ready to confess,'" Regan said in Sunday's show, when asked how the interview came together. "The only condition that he had was that he didn't want to call the book I Did It. He wanted to put an 'if' in front of it so that he would have deniability with his children. He couldn't face his children and he couldn't tell them that he had done it. That was the way it was portrayed to me."
Simpson did the interview as he was getting set to release a book in 2006 called If I Did It. Regan was shocked that he was releasing the book, because if he did it, then he's confessing to a crime and if he didn't do it, then he's writing a book about hypothetically killing his ex-wife.
So it’s pretty safe to say that this interview was set up to promote his book about him hypothetically murdering his wife and her friend.
And yes OJ is that stupid. This is the same guy that was talked into stealing back his memorabilia.
StringerBell
OG
The Juice’s attorney has no chill...
lol is there any proof that Nicole owed money to cartels? How much was it that Nicole couldn’t pay it back while riding around in a Ferrari and renting out a condo? The media didn’t hide shit. The court would have allowed it if the defense could have provide any evidence of a third party committing the killing but guess what. They couldn’t. All the blood led to O.J. and what do y’all say about the witness that saw ojs bronco speeding away from the crime scene around the time of the murder?