Welcome To aBlackWeb

Murderous Pig found guilty of murder of Laquan McDonald..

ct-met-judge-vincent-gaughan-20180824


The face of the white supremacist “justice” system in Chicago...
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/call-for-political-action-after-laquan-mcdonald-cases

Call For Political Action After Laquan McDonald Cases

CHICAGO (AP) — Activists and others who were disappointed by the outcome of two historic cases involving the killing of black teenager Laquan McDonald by a white Chicago police officer see a way forward — by turning tragedy into political power.

A judge on Friday sentenced former Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke to less than seven years in prison for McDonald’s 2014 death.

Video of Van Dyke firing 16 shots at McDonald as he walked away from the officer prompted protests, a U.S. Justice Department investigation of the Chicago Police Department and the firing of the police superintendent, among other changes. It also was a key piece of evidence in Van Dyke’s trial, when a jury last year found him guilty of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery.

The judge’s sentence of six years and nine months — less than half of the penalty sought by prosecutors — means the 40-year-old could be released in just over three years. It came a day after a different judge acquitted three other Chicago police officers accused of lying about the shooting to protect Van Dyke.

Activist William Calloway, who helped force Mayor Rahm Emanuel to release police video of the shooting, said he and other community members were “heartbroken” by the judges’ decisions, but won’t give up seeking changes.

“If you’re a black Chicagoan, don’t protest. Don’t take to the streets,” he said. “It’s time we take to the polls.”

Calloway is trying to defeat a five-term alderman in local elections next month to win a seat on the Chicago City Council. He has criticized the incumbent and other black aldermen for not doing enough to change the culture of a police force that has long had a reputation of racial bias and condoning police brutality.

The McDonald shooting already has been a major factor in Chicago politics.

The charges against Van Dyke were announced in 2015, the same day City Hall — under a judge’s order — released the video.

The case was widely seen as the reason the county’s top prosecutor, Anita Alvarez, was voted out of office a few months later, and it’s thought to be a factor in Emanuel’s decision not to seek a third term next month.

Roughly a dozen candidates are running to replace him, and almost all of them blasted both judges’ decisions this week and what they said was a lack of accountability for officers who commit crimes while on duty.

“With so many members of our Black and Brown communities criminalized and jailed for non-violent drug offenses, Van Dyke’s sentence today shows that our lives don’t matter,” Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, a top candidate who’s African-American, said in a written statement.

The impact has extended to communities outside Chicago, said Rashad Robinson, president of the national civil rights organization Color Of Change.

The group worked with Chicago-area activists to unseat Alvarez, with a “Bye, Anita” campaign. It’s also helped elect new district attorneys in places like Philadelphia and in St. Louis County, where a white officer wasn’t charged with the 2014 killing of Michel Brown, a black and unarmed 18-year-old, in Ferguson, Missouri.

Color of Change opened an office in downtown Ferguson to support Wesley Bell, who last fall was the first African-American to be elected St. Louis County circuit attorney. Bell’s first action after taking office was to remove three veteran assistant prosecutors, including one who played a role in presenting evidence to a grand jury in the case. He’s also made policy changes, such as ending prosecutions for most marijuana possession cases.

“The killing of Laquan and that video is one of the many catalysts that have sparked this current movement we’re in of prosecutor accountability,” Robinson said. “Our metric of success as a movement can’t solely be based on whether or not police officers go to prison, but that the culture of policing changes in this country.”

Changes implemented in Chicago include a requirement that the city release video of fatal police shootings within 60 days. The city has also changed how police shootings are investigated. The Police Department accelerated a program to equip all officers with body cameras.

And the fact that Van Dyke was charged and convicted is historic — no other Chicago officer has faced the same fate in a half-century. The other three officers are believed to be the first to be charged with covering up a police-involved shooting.

Even as McDonald’s great uncle lamented the length of the sentence, he noted the significance.

“If they’d have sentenced him to one minute, it is a victory,” the Rev. Martin Hunter said. “It sets a precedent and it sends a strong message to unjust police officers that now you can and will go to jail if you’re caught lying, if you’re caught breaking the law.”
 
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...nald-jason-van-dyke-beaten-prison/2867654002/

Former Chicago cop convicted of murdering Laquan McDonald beaten by fellow prison inmates

Former Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke, who is in the midst of a nearly seven-year prison sentence for the murder of a black teen, was assaulted by fellow inmates soon after being transferred to a prison in Connecticut earlier this month, according to the ex-cop's attorneys and wife.

Van Dyke was convicted in October of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm for the 2014 shooting death of Laquan McDonald, an incident that sparked protests in Chicago and national outrage..

He was beaten soon after being transferred to a new prison, says Jennifer Blagg, a defense attorney assisting Van Dyke on his appeal. The ex-cop was sentenced last month to an 81-month sentence for the state charges.

Federal records show he is being held at a federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut.

Van Dyke's attorneys said that he suffered facial injuries in the Feb. 7 attack, which occurred two days after he arrived at the prison. An attorney for Van Dyke received a call from an employee at the Connecticut prison on Wednesday who she said offered further detail about the attack and expressed concern about his safety.

Tammy Wendt, a defense attorney who served on Van Dyke's trial team, said she was notified by Illinois corrections officials about his transfer after he was already on his way to Connecticut. She said the agency did not provide her a reason for the move.

Van Dyke was immediately placed in general population upon his arrival at the federal prison, where he was "led like a lamb to the slaughter," Wendt said.

"He was placed in general population in a unit filled with gangbangers, violent criminals," Wendt said. "Even though they call this a minimum security prison, these are violent criminals on the last leg of their sentence. To put a police officer who has spent his entire career locking up bad guys in with these bad guys, it doesn't take a genius to know that it's obviously going to get him in trouble. It's unconscionable that this happened."

After the attack, Van Dyke received medical treatment and was placed in a segregated housing unit at the prison, Wendt said. She said he told his appellate attorneys about the attack, which took place inside his cell, during a conference call earlier this week to discuss his appeal.

Van Dyke had been held at a jail in western Illinois as he awaited sentencing because authorities in Chicago feared they could not assure his safety in the Cook County Jail. Since his sentencing, Blagg said that Van Dyke had been held in at least one other facility before he was moved to Danbury.

Lindsey Hess, a spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Corrections, said Van Dyke was transferred out of state under the terms of a federal intergovernmental agreement.

"For safety and security purposes, the department does not discuss details of those transferred under this agreement," Hess said.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons has not returned a request for comment on the incident.

The injuries were not life-threatening but nonetheless jarring to Van Dyke and his family, who have expressed concern that prison officials won't be able to keep him safe.

"I've had a feeling in bottom of my stomach since they took him away...that something was going to happen," the ex-officer's wife, Tiffany Van Dyke, told reporters.

Van Dyke’s defense team has been in contact with the Illinois Department of Correction to discuss his safety in the aftermath of the incident, Blagg said.

“Jason runs into problems because of what he represents and there are inmates who resent that and would be proud to say they are the guy that beat him up or hurt him,” Blagg told USA TODAY. “We’re obviously concerned because what he’s come to symbolize.”

Van Dyke shot McDonald in an encounter that began after police were called to a parking lot on the Southwest Side of Chicago on the evening of Oct. 20, 2014. Police received reports of a person breaking into trucks and stealing radios.

Officers arrived to find the 17-year-old McDonald walking erratically in the street with a small knife.

Van Dyke pulled up to the scene, got out of his squad car and within seconds opened fire. He shot the teen 16 times. The shooting was captured on police dashcam video, which appears to show McDonald moving away from Van Dyke when he opened fire.

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul announced this week that he had petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court to order a resentencing of Van Dyke, arguing the trial judge did not follow state laws in the sentencing process. Special prosecutor Joseph McMahon argued during sentencing that Van Dyke should face a term of no less than 18 years in prison under Illinois statutes.

Van Dyke’s defense team also announced this week that they would appeal the former officer’s conviction.

0BAFB349-A5A7-4448-91DB-D2FE710946A0.gif


I knew my Valentine’s Day would be great day for me.. but this news made it just little bit better...
 
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jason-...red-to-prison-called-one-of-nations-cushiest/

Ex-cop convicted in Chicago teen's death transferred to prison called one of nation's "cushiest"

The former Chicago police officer convicted in the shooting death of black teen Laquan McDonald has been transferred to a New York federal correctional institution that's been called one of the country's "cushiest" prisons. Van Dyke was sentenced to less than seven years in prison on his second-degree murder conviction in the 2014 police shooting that drew widespread outrage. In a rare move, prosecutors have challenged the sentence.

Last month, Van Dyke's wife said that he was transferred from from an Illinois state prison to a federal prison in Connecticut, where he was injured in an assault. Prison officials confirmed the assault at FCI Danbury in Connecticut, which they said resulted in "minor injuries."

Van Dyke is now at Otisville Federal Correctional Institution in New York, according to prison records. A U.S. Bureau of Prisons spokesperson told CBS Chicago Van Dyke was transferred from Danbury to Otisville on Monday, but declined to reveal the reason for the move.

Otisville, a medium-security federal facility about 70 miles from New York City, was named by Forbes in 2009 as one of the "America's 10 cushiest prisons." The facility has an adjacent minimum-security camp that offers recreational activities including weights, cardio equipment, bocce ball, horseshoes, a handball court, a tennis area and baseball and basketball field, according to the prison's online handbook. However, most of the inmates on Otisville's campus — 710 out of a total of 836 — are assigned to the medium-security federal correctional institution or detention center, according to the handbook, with the rest assigned to the camp. Inmates in both have access to both a law and a "leisure" library, the handbook says.

Otisville has been home to a number of high-profile and celebrity inmates. A judge agreed to recommended that former Trump lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen serve his fraud sentence there, reports The New York Times, though the federal Bureau of Prisons will have the final say. Former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver, free on bail pending an appeal of his federal corruption conviction, has also asked to serve his sentence at Otisville, the Times reports. "Jersey Shore" reality show personality Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino is serving his tax evasion sentence at the minimum-security camp, according to the Times.

The facility is commonly requested by Jewish inmates, reports the New York Times, because it offers a full-time Hasidic chaplain who oversees prayer services three times daily, religious classes and Kosher meals.

Absent a new sentence and with credit for good behavior, Van Dyke will likely serve around three years of his nearly seven year sentence in McDonald's shooting.

McDonald's family has called the sentence "a slap in the face to us and a slap on the wrist" for Van Dyke. Prosecutors have argued the trial judge did not appropriately apply the law in handing down the sentence and have asked the state supreme court to review it. Van Dyke is contesting the challenge.

Police video of the shooting showed Van Dyke open fire as the teen, who was holding a knife, appeared to be walking away. Van Dyke continued to shoot the 17-year-old while he was lying on the street.
 
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ago-officer-jason-van-dyke-s-sentence-n985196

Court upholds ex-Chicago officer Jason Van Dyke's sentence for Laquan McDonald shooting

The Illinois Supreme Court denied a rare bid by Illinois' attorney general and a special prosecutor to get the justices to toss a lower court's sentence.


CHICAGO — The Illinois Supreme Court on Tuesday let stand a prison sentence of less than seven years for a white Chicago police officer convicted of killing black teenager Laquan McDonald that many criticized as far too lenient.

The high court offered no explanation for its 4-2 decision that denied a rare bid by Illinois' attorney general and a special prosecutor to get the justices to toss a lower court's sentence. One judge issued a strong dissent and one partially dissented.

The 40-year-old Jason Van Dyke, the first Chicago police officer sentenced for an on-duty shooting in a half century, could go free in as little as three years with credit for good behavior behind bars.

McDonald was carrying a small knife in 2014 when Van Dyke exited his squad car and almost immediately opened fire. Police video released in 2015 showed Van Dyke firing 16 bullets into McDonald, many after the 17-year-old had crumpled to the ground.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul stopped short of criticizing the court, though he went out of his way several times to note the four justices in the majority didn't offer a word of explanation for why they ruled as they did.

An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't appear to be an option, including because the core legal issues have to do exclusively with Illinois law. Raoul acknowledged that his office had run out of options.

Asked whether Van Dyke's comparatively light sentence was an illustration of racial disparities in sentencing, Raoul paused before saying: "Suffice to say that I believe the sentence was inconsistent with the law."

Van Dyke's lawyer, Dan Herbert, heralded the ruling, saying he hoped it "will strike a fatal blow to the political exploitation" of McDonald's death. Raoul has previously denied that politics ever entered into the decision to push for a new sentencing hearing.

Jurors in October convicted Van Dyke of one count of second-degree murder, which carries a maximum 20-year prison term, and 16 counts of aggravated battery, which carries up to 30 years on each count. Leading up to sentencing in January, prosecutors asked for a prison sentence of at least 18 years.

Van Dyke went to trial charged with first-degree murder, which has a mandatory minimum prison term of 45 years. Jurors replaced it with second-degree murder after finding Van Dyke shot out of fear for his life, though that fear was unreasonable.

The February request for a sentencing do-over didn't say explicitly what many Chicago residents have said — that Van Dyke's punishment didn't match the severity of his crime. It focused instead on legal arguments around precedent and sentencing calculations.

Illinois judges can sentence people only for the most serious crime when they are convicted of multiple crimes for what amounts to a single act. A 2004 landmark ruling by the state Supreme Court said unambiguously that the crime with the higher penalty is the most serious.

But Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan in January deemed the second-degree murder conviction the most serious, even though battery carries a longer potential sentence.

Justice P. Scott Neville Jr. noted in his dissent that Gaughan pointed solely to the dissenting opinion in the court's 2004 ruling when he sentenced Van Dyke.

"A dissenting opinion is not the law of Illinois," Neville wrote. "Indeed, it is the opposite."

Justice Thomas L. Kilbride, who partially dissented from the majority Tuesday, agreed with Neville on that issue.

In his seven-page explanation, Neville added that allowing a sentence that's not grounded in proper law undermines the public's sense of justice.

Only in AmeriKKKa...
 
https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/c...nald-shooting-jason-van-dyke-janet-mondragon/

Cop denies dozens of texts with Van Dyke affected her story of McDonald shooting

A Chicago cop who sometimes texted Jason Van Dyke dozens of times a day said their relationship didn’t influence what she told investigators about the shooting of Laquan McDonald.

Officer Janet Mondragon was on the scene in October 2014 when Van Dyke shot the 17-year-old McDonald 16 times. Mondragon told investigators she didn’t see Van Dyke shoot the teen because she was looking down, shifting her squad car’s transmission into park.

Mondragon denied the text exchanges — as many as 70 a day between the two in the weeks before the shooting — indicated a friendship that would affect statements she made to investigators.

“No,” she said simply, when asked if a friendship with Van Dyke affected her judgement.

Mondragon testified about the texts Thursday at a Chicago Police Board hearing, one of several this week to determine if she and three other cops accused of making or approving false statements about the shooting should be fired.

John Gibbons, the attorney representing CPD Supt. Eddie Johnson, disagreed when Mondragon said she did not socialize with Van Dyke outside work.

“That’s not true, is it? You were socializing with Van Dyke almost every day in the weeks prior to the shooting … texting each other numerous times a day,” he said, noting the exchanges, captured in 1,300 pages of her cell phone records, had been entered into evidence.

Mondragon said the term “co-workers” accurately reflected the nature of their interactions.

She also emphasized that the real-time commotion of the 2014 Southwest Side shooting was not something accurately reflected in a slow-motion video of the event that was played at the hearing.

“I probably flinched a little bit. It all happened so fast … next thing I know I put the car in park and that was it,” said Mondragon.

The dashboard-mounted camera in her squad car captured footage of the shooting in the 4100 block of South Pulaski Road that’s been viewed millions of times around the globe.

“Why in the world would she lie about something like that?” Mondragon’s attorney, William Fahy, asked in opening statements Wednesday — asserting his client was momentarily paying attention to the gear shift.

The fact that Van Dyke pulled the trigger was never in dispute. “It was no whodunnit,” Fahy said.

Mondragon saw Van Dyke and his partner, Joseph Walsh, draw their guns in the moments before the shooting but only heard the shots because she was shifting gears — a process that could have taken two or three seconds, she said.

She told investigators she knew the shots came from one of the two men, she just didn’t know which, Mondragon said.

Gibbons said Mondragon was lying about putting the car in park because the video shows her squad car still moving when the shooting happens.

The Police Board will not rule on the cases for another few months. The officers are assigned to desk duty, stripped of their police powers.

Mondragon, who worked as a Cook County correctional officer before joining the police department, said Thursday that one of her sons is a Chicago cop and another is about to enter the Chicago Police Academy.

The jobs of Sgt. Stephen Franko and officers Daphne Sebastian and Ricardo Viramontes also hang in the balance at this week’s hearings.

Though none of the four officers were criminally charged, the latest fallout from the McDonald shooting comes on the heels of back-to-back historic criminal trials that stemmed from the teenager’s death.

The first of those two trials ended in October with Officer Jason Van Dyke — who shot McDonald 16 times — convicted by a jury of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery. Van Dyke was sentenced to 6 years and 9 months in prison.

In a separate trial three months ago, a Cook County judge acquitted three other Chicago cops accused of taking part in a cover-up. In that case, CPD Det. David March, Thomas Gaffney and Van Dyke’s partner, Walsh, faced charges of conspiracy, obstructing justice and official misconduct.

This week’s hearings stem from administrative charges filed by the CPD in August 2016 with the Police Board; the board decided to hold off on deciding the fate of the four officers’ careers until after the conclusion of both trials.
 
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...-laquan-mcdonald-shooting-20190410-story.html

Slow-motion video shows Laquan McDonald still a threat after he was shot and fell, cop's attorney contends


Lawyers for four Chicago police officers fighting for their jobs over the alleged cover-up of the 2014 fatal shooting of Laquan McDonald argued Wednesday that they did not lie about the incident even if the now-infamous police dashboard camera video doesn’t match up with their account.

Superintendent Eddie Johnson is seeking to fire Officers Daphne Sebastian, Ricardo Viramontes and Janet Mondragon as well as Sgt. Stephen Franko for falsifying or approving police reports that exaggerated the threat posed by McDonald, who was high on PCP as he refused police commands to drop a knife while walking away from police on a Southwest Side street.

In the first day of the disciplinary hearing, Viramontes’ attorney said an FBI-enhanced, slow-motion version of the video of the shooting backs up the officer’s claim that the black teen still posed a threat after he was shot and fell to the street.

The attorney, Jennifer Russell, did not elaborate in her opening statement at the Chicago Police Board hearing on how the slow-motion version proved what the regular-speed video doesn’t show.

"Hopefully, the superintendent would have reviewed that before (bringing) charges,” she told the hearing officer, Thomas Johnson.

In her statement to investigators for the city inspector general’s office, Sebastian reported that McDonald continued to move after he was shot and fell to the street as Officer Jason Van Dyke emptied his gun, shooting the teen 16 times. Viramontes took it a step further, telling investigators he saw McDonald try to rise up with a knife still in his hand.

A lawyer prosecuting the case on the city’s behalf contended in his opening remarks that the video proved that the four officers lied in their statements to a police detective that night.

The officers “had the responsibility to tell the truth, the whole unvarnished truth,” attorney John Gibbons told the hearing officer.

Mondragon had claimed not to see the shooting because she was putting her squad car in park, Gibbons also said, but the video footage shows that the police SUV was still moving.

Sebastian, among the first two officers to testify at the hearing, acknowledged she didn't watch the video the night of the shooting.

"I felt I know what happened," she said when asked why not by the hearing officer. "I felt that what the dashcam shows (wasn't) any different than what I saw."

Their disciplinary hearing is the latest chapter in the scandal following two historic criminal trials that saw a Cook County jury convict Van Dyke of second-degree murder and a judge clear three other officers of cover-up charges in a controversial ruling. Van Dyke, who is white, continued to fire after McDonald fell mortally wounded to the street.

None of the four officers fighting their dismissals were charged criminally.

In his opening statement, Sebastian’s lawyer, Brian Sexton, said there was “a big difference between a lie and someone’s perception.”

“She doesn’t try to embellish. She doesn’t try to exaggerate,” Sexton said in a booming voice while gesturing heavily. “She’s not looking at Van Dyke and (his partner). She’s looking at the threat she sees.”

“Stand in her shoes. Use your common sense,” Sexton later said. “It sure as hell doesn’t amount to a lie.”

Russell, Viramontes’ lawyer, said the officer spoke to a detective at the shooting scene for maybe less than a minute about what he saw. He also had other responsibilities at the crime scene, including gathering all the names of officers who responded and their star numbers, she said.

“A video is just one piece of the puzzle,” Russell said. “It will be up to the superintendent to prove (he was lying). That, I contend, is impossible.”

Mondragon’s lawyer, William Fahy, also criticized city lawyers for relying so heavily on the video.

“Human beings are not robots. Human beings are not cameras,” Fahy said. “Her perception was her perception.”

Franko, who also testified Wednesday, was grilled by the city’s lawyer about why he signed off on the allegedly falsified police reports after watching the video.

Franko said he viewed only a few seconds of the video footage.

“My job was not to investigate the shooting,” Franko testified.
 

4 Chicago police officers fired over statements they made after another officer fatally shot Laquan McDonald


Four Chicago police officers were fired Thursday over false or misleading statements made after the 2014 killing of Laquan McDonald by another officer. The city's police board made the decision.

The officer who killed McDonald, Jason Van Dyke, was found guilty of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery in the killing of McDonald, 17, and he was sentenced in January to six years and nine months in prison.

Chicago's superintendent of police, Eddie Johnson, in 2016 had recommended that Sgt. Stephen Franko and officers Ricardo Viramontes, Janet Mondragon and Daphne Sebastian be fired for violating rules of conduct after the shooting, according to the board's decision released Thursday.

Franko, who was the first on-scene supervisor in the October 2014 shooting, approved reports that "contained several demonstrable and known falsehoods,” including that Van Dyke was injured by the 17-year-old, who had been carrying a knife, the police board wrote in the decision.

The other three officers, all of whom were on the scene, gave statements about the shooting, and the board found that "each of the three officers failed in their duty — either by outright lying or by shading the truth."

Those statements were critical because they would be used by investigators to determine whether the shooting of McDonald was justified and whether a crime occurred, the board wrote.

"Their conduct is antithetical to that expected and required of a sworn law enforcement officer, who at all times has the police board wrote in the decision released Thursday.

An email to the president of the police union, the Fraternal Order of Police Chicago Lodge 7, was not immediately returned Thursday night.

One official with the Fraternal Order of Police objected at the meeting, saying the decision to fire the officers would lead to more violence in the city and against police, because officers will fear they can be fired merely for responding to a job, NBC Chicago reported.

"These four people, unfortunately, are getting fired because of what other people did or didn't do," a different FOP official, Patrick Murray said, according to the station. "These police officers did their job."

None of the four officers fired by the police board were charged criminally, however they were stripped of police powers and assigned to desk duty as their case proceeded, the Associated Press reported.

The teen's death sparked protests in Chicago. The police superintendent at the time, Garry McCarthy, was fired by the mayor in 2015, one week after police dash-cam video of the deadly encounter was released.

Van Dyke and other officers were responding to reports that McDonald was carrying a knife and breaking into cars in the city's Southwest Side.

Dash-cam footage of the shooting released a year later showed McDonald walking away from the officers when Van Dyke opened fire and continued to shoot at the teen, even when he was already on the ground. Van Dyke at his trial testified that he feared for his life.

The police board said in its decision Thursday that Franko had the opportunity to watch the dash-cam video in the hours after the incident but admitted that while he watched "bits and pieces" of the video, he did not watch the whole video despite being tasked with reviewing officers' reports.

The board found that Franko not watching the entire video was "incredible."

"A fatal, officer-involved shooting had occurred, and perhaps the key piece of contemporaneous evidence as to what had happened was available to Sergeant Franko for hours," the board wrote.

The board said that Viramontes told a detective that he saw McDonald continue to move and try and get up off the ground, with the knife still in his hand, after he was shot, and that video evidence showed that was false.

The police board said that Mondragon didn't appear to be truthful when she told investigators that she was putting her vehicle in park and looking down and did not see the shooting, when video evidence showed the car was in motion for the first four seconds of the shooting.

The board said Sebastian told a detective that McDonald ignored the commands of Van Dyke and another officer to drop the knife and that McDonald kept advancing waving the knife and that McDonald was moving on the ground after he was shot. The board did not find that she made false statements and said her account largely bore some semblance as to what happened.

"She did not, however, offer a precise statement as to the timing of these events, nor did she mention the critical fact that Mr. McDonald was walking away from the officers at the time he was shot," the board wrote.

The police board noted that none of the officers were responsible for the fatal shooting, but said they needed to be fired for failing to accurately report it and "for telling outright lies and/or half-truths."

The four officers can challenge their firings by filing lawsuits in Cook County Circuit Court, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Three other officers who were criminally charged and accused of conspiring to protect Van Dyke were acquitted by a Cook County judge in January.

The U.S. Department of Justice in early January 2017 released a report that said among other things, Chicago police officers had skewed probes and had a "code of silence" to favor and protect officers.
 
Back
Top