Welcome To aBlackWeb

Is 6/6 Better Than 5/9?

5 Grand

Old School Godfather
Jordan is 6/6
Magic is 5/9

One way to look at it is that Jordan never lost a finals series.

Another way to look at it is that Jordan only went to the finals 6 times, Magic went to the finals 9 times.
 
Never failing in numerous attempts>>>failing 4 times in numerous attempts
 
being 6 / 6 doesn't mean you didn't lose there were a few times MJ :hehe2:didn't even make it to the finals with the Bulls

Rings>>> Finals win percentage

that said 6>5

so if lebron ends up getting 7 rings that would put him ahead of MJ
 
The TRUE question we should be asking here is this:

Is 11/13 (or even 6/11) Better than 6/6?

1601030629813.gif
11/13

1601030675660.gif
1601030709580.gif
6/11.
 
Last edited:
6 is better than 5

It’s all about total rings.

you can be 6 out 10. And the other person 6 out of 6 and I would say they are still equal.


No 6/10 is better than 6/6. Because 6/6 means you lost in the playoffs early and didn't even make it to the finals.

When I rate quarterbacks I give them a point for a Super Bowl win, and half a point for a Super Bowl loss.

So Jim Kelly gets 2 points in my book because although he didn't win, at least he made it to the Super Bowl 4X.

That's how I feel about Magic, he might not have won those 4 championships, but at least he made it to he championships.
 
This is a lowkey Lebron stan thread. But anyway, 6/6 >> 5/9

I grew up on Magic, but can admit the Lakers had a far easier road to the FInals out West.
 
Back
Top