Führer Trump’s Impeachment Inquiry Thread. Update: The Senate completes the coverup
- Thread starter StringerBell
- Start date
StringerBell
OG
DOJ Denies Bolton And Barr Discussed Trump’s ‘Personal Favors’ To Autocratic Leaders
Early Tuesday morning, the Justice Department pushed back on the New York Times' report on former National Security Adviser John Bolton's unpublished manuscript, which contained an explosive account…
talkingpointsmemo.com
StringerBell
OG
Republicans Crafting Way To Avoid Calling Bolton As A Witness
The bombshell revealed in Bolton’s manuscript has made it more difficult for Republican senators to insist that additional witness testimony is unnecessary.
talkingpointsmemo.com
bootcheese3000
Residential Hero of the Black Weirdos
TheNightKing
J.A.P.A.N.
It’s all part of the plan. The swing state Republicans get to look like they’re not towing the party line. Meanwhile, Trump will invoke executive privilege and stop Bolton from testifying. Regardless of how ridiculous the argument for executive privilege, the Republicans as a whole will act like their hands are tied and the trial ends with all Republicans getting what they want.
Last edited:
Inori
NAWF
I hope not but this is the likely scenario unfortunately
StringerBell
OG
White House Issues Threat to John Bolton Over Book
The White House is reportedly ramping up its efforts to stop the publication of an upcoming book from Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton.
www.mediaite.com
StringerBell
OG
John Bolton Likes Tweet Saying Trump Should Fire Himself | Law & Crime
Republican hawk John Bolton, formerly President Donald Trump's handpicked National Security Advisor, liked a tweet saying Trump should fire the moron who hired John Bolton.
www.mediaite.com
Breezy_Kilroy
Black Frost
I can't seem to find the information anywhere so I'm hoping someone with a little more insight can explain why there would have to be a vote to allow witnesses and evidence into trial as important as this one?
How can you hold a trial without something as fundamental as evidence? It's almost as if it's setup for a cover-up to be allowed.
How can you hold a trial without something as fundamental as evidence? It's almost as if it's setup for a cover-up to be allowed.